http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 06:20 ---
I'm not sure what you mean by a semantic forward reference, but I guess you're
right about the basic essence of the bug.
> (funny - your last two comments were posted one year
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=633
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 07:01 ---
I see that the spec now says "typedef or enum" where previously it just said
"typedef", thus reducing this to issue 632. So should this be marked as a dupe
(and the summary of
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1807
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2454
Summary: tupleof(member) is incorrectly evaluated inside foreach
over members-tuple
Product: D
Version: 2.020
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2454
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 18:50 ---
My bad, I forgot attaching the expected and actual result. Here they are:
Expected output:
float
double
int
Actual output:
float
float
float
The tuple is ok, but foreach bo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|tupleof(member) is |typeof(object) is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2454
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 19:51 ---
What version?
version: 1026 // what codepad.org uses
float
double
int
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2454
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 19:54 ---
> Version: 2.020
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=929
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 21:55 ---
If Walter's looking for low-hanging fruit, it doesn't get much lower than this.
A 5-line diff? Why has this been open for almost 2 years, anyway?
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2326
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 22:13 ---
This only happens on D1.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2455
Summary: Cannot use .ptr or .length in asm code
Product: D
Version: 1.011
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Compone
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1125
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
14 matches
Mail list logo