[Issue 3069] Issue 3069 - Array literals do not implicitly cast to void[]

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3069 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3849] [missing error] Array literal length doesn't match

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849 --- Comment #12 from Stewart Gordon 2011-09-10 18:31:01 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > See also: > http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=144237 > > From that post: > >> The solution is to a

[Issue 6642] SysTime should not be hasUnsharedAliasing

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6642 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #1

[Issue 5346] instantiation of std.conv.toImpl and std.format.formatValue fails for unions

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5346 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-10 11:50:43 PDT --- Partial fixed in 2.055. formatValue is now support union formatting. void main() { U u; //writeln(text(u)); // toImpl error instantiation toImpl writeln(u); // Prin

[Issue 5237] writefln doesn't respect Complex.toString

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4927] writefln silently ignores arguments not present in the format string

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4927 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-10 10:50:28 PDT --- If a programmer wants to format just the first argument, then this is the code to write: writef("%d", 1); writefln(2); Introducing/keeping a muddy semantics to avoid writin

[Issue 6643] Very slow compilation for large switch() using -O and -inline

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6643 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Com

[Issue 4927] writefln silently ignores arguments not present in the format string

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4927 --- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2011-09-10 09:28:47 PDT --- One possibility would be to silently ignore arguments is positional parameters are used, and not ignore them otherwise. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues

[Issue 6643] New: Very slow compilation for large switch() using -O and -inline

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6643 Summary: Very slow compilation for large switch() using -O and -inline Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: norm

[Issue 6641] RefAppender!(T[]) should be OutputRange.

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6641 --- Comment #2 from SHOO 2011-09-10 08:41:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think RefAppender should just be deprecated/scheduled for deprecation. It > was a short term backwards compatibility hack from a long time ago. Hmm... I unders

[Issue 6639] Difference beetwen "foo" and "foo"c

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-09-11 01:36:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > My point is maybe we don’t need unannotated string literal out of lexer. > Maybe c is better default, but we need simple rule. > > Confess I’m not aware of all

[Issue 4927] writefln silently ignores arguments not present in the format string

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4927 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-10 08:35:19 PDT --- That is a design of formattedWrite. Andrei talked: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/231#issuecomment-1995490 > Phobos used to make a fuss about ignored arguments,

[Issue 6639] Difference beetwen "foo" and "foo"c

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 --- Comment #2 from zeljkog 2011-09-10 17:12:58 CEST --- Sorry for duplication. My point is maybe we don’t need unannotated string literal out of lexer. Maybe c is better default, but we need simple rule. Confess I’m not aware of all consequ

[Issue 5371] ambiguous stringnize of class with alias this

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5371 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Issue 6641] RefAppender!(T[]) should be OutputRange.

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6641 David Simcha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from D

[Issue 6642] New: SysTime should not be hasUnsharedAliasing

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6642 Summary: SysTime should not be hasUnsharedAliasing Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

[Issue 6641] New: RefAppender!(T[]) should be OutputRange.

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6641 Summary: RefAppender!(T[]) should be OutputRange. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 6639] Difference beetwen "foo" and "foo"c

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2367] Overloading error with string literals

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2367 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeljko@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from y

[Issue 6640] New: More formatting consistency between string and range of char

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6640 Summary: More formatting consistency between string and range of char Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 6639] New: Difference beetwen "foo" and "foo"c

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 Summary: Difference beetwen "foo" and "foo"c Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 3805] std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle loop index bug, will drop character after a %%

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4775] No substitution on writef("%%%s", "hi")

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4775 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y0uf00...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from K

[Issue 3849] [missing error] Array literal length doesn't match

2011-09-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849 --- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-10 02:35:35 PDT --- See also: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=144237 >From that post: > The solution is to add some symbol that explicitly