[Issue 9063] static assert should resolve property function call

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9063 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-11-23 03:19:58 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/1ac1c9a09511f8e3068f8cc67ed74839803f6e2

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2012-11-23 04:57:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > If @property is all about equivalence of fields and accessors, then &foo > should > not return a function pointer. Then, there is no way to get a function p

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #5 fr

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 --- Comment #6 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-11-23 05:04:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > If @property is all about equivalence of fields and accessors, then &foo > > should > > not return a function pointer. >

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 --- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara 2012-11-23 05:32:10 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Then, there is no way to get a function pointer from property function, > > right? > > ... > > ()ref => foo It looks like a lambda. Is it same as this?

[Issue 9064] New: Add isInstanceOf to std.traits

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9064 Summary: Add isInstanceOf to std.traits Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phob

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 --- Comment #8 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-11-23 05:41:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > Then, there is no way to get a function pointer from property function, > > > right? > > > ... > > > > ()ref => foo >

[Issue 9055] [CTFE] Compiler segfaults on paren-free auto-return forward referenced member function call on nonexistent 'this' receiver

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9055 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||CTFE CC|

[Issue 9064] Add isInstanceOf to std.traits

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9064 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitr

[Issue 9065] New: Please consider adding these std.traits

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9065 Summary: Please consider adding these std.traits Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Compon

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 --- Comment #9 from Kenji Hara 2012-11-23 06:06:46 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) [snip] OK, I understood what you say. But implementing it in library might be much difficult... --- // An experimental implementation of timon's idea. templat

[Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062 --- Comment #10 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-11-23 06:54:28 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > [snip] > > OK, I understood what you say. But implementing it in library might be much > difficult... > > --- > // An expe

[Issue 8997] template instances omit symbol that may be used in other modules

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8997 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 9066] Implement constructor forwarding template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-11-23 11:02:46 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1165) code -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 9066] New: Implement constructor forwarding template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9066 Summary: Implement constructor forwarding template Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Comp

[Issue 9067] New: Can't assign values from privately included modules to enums.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9067 Summary: Can't assign values from privately included modules to enums. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: n

[Issue 9068] New: ICE when trying to break outer loop from inside switch statement

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9068 Summary: ICE when trying to break outer loop from inside switch statement Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 9012] writef/format inconsistent with format specifier

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9012 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --- Com

[Issue 8602] Assertion failure

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8602 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #1 from hst.