[Issue 3235] Function literals must be deduced as "function" or "delegate"

2011-04-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235 --- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2011-04-28 13:39:40 PDT --- BTW this is in TDPL now, with Walter's approval. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Issue 3235] Function literals must be deduced as "function" or "delegate"

2009-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVAL

[Issue 3235] Function literals must be deduced as "function" or "delegate"

2009-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235 --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2009-08-08 11:55:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is as designed. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/expression.html#FunctionLiteral > "If the keywords function or delegate are omitted, i

[Issue 3235] Function literals must be deduced as "function" or "delegate"

2009-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3235] Function literals must be deduced as "function" or "delegate"

2009-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235 --- Comment #1 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2009-08-08 07:17:17 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Consider: > > void foo(alias pred)() { > pragma(msg, pred.stringof); > } > > unittest { > foo!((i) { return i < 0; })(); > int z =