http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
--- Comment #13 from yebblies 2011-06-14 08:51:36 PDT ---
Without this feature, what should happen with lazy void?
void lf(lazy void a) { a; }
void main()
{
int i;
lf(i++);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userp
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #12 from Don
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-06-14 05:14:02 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> You're talking about two completely separate issues, both of which are
> enhancements. This issue is about providing a clearer error message wi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
--- Comment #10 from yebblies 2011-06-13 22:21:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
>
> I don't understand. Elsewhere I have a bug report that asks for a new error
> message if you don't use the result of a pure function.
> But this bug report j
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-06-13 14:31:09 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/121
>
> This adds the error message:
> testx.d(4): Error: expression with no side effects used
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Summary|Misleding error mes
