https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DU
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfj1es...@sneakemail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
--- Co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #26 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-03-10 17:31:34 PST ---
An example of the problems this
avoids:http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.announce&article_id=22649
Andrej Mitrovic:
> I see you are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #25 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-20 04:29:08 PDT ---
See also:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2504536/why-allow-concatenation-of-string-literals
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #24 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-22 12:01:40 PST ---
A recent note by Walter:
> Andrei's right. This is not about making it right-associative. It is about
> defining in the language that:
>
> ((a ~ b) ~ c)
>
> is guaran
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #23 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-17
12:04:03 PST ---
If constfold can access a's type, it can make the right decision.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #22 from Stewart Gordon 2010-11-17 03:58:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> doesn't this solve that problem? a ~ ("this" ~ "that")
It does. My point was that somebody might accidentally not add the brackets.
--
Configure iss
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #20 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-16 19:38:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > Not that there's any real use case for "this" "that" anyway. And those rare
> > use cases
>
> I use automatic joi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #19 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #18 from Stewart Gordon 2010-11-16 17:15:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> For example, if a is a string[], then a ~ "this" "that" and a ~ "this" ~
> "that"
> evaluate to different strings.
Different string arrays even.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
--- Comment #17 from S
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #16 from Don 2010-11-13 23:58:35 PST ---
Sorry, missed out a line:
if (e1->op == TOKcat && (e2->op == TOKstring || e2->op == TOKnull)
&& (((CatExp *)e1)->e2->op == TOKstring || ((CatExp *)e1)->e2->op
== TOKnull))
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #15 from Don
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #14 from Ellery Newcomer 2010-11-13
19:26:18 PST ---
you don't need to mess with associativity rules, you just need to be able to
handle two or three ast cases:
1. (~ str str)ie str ~ str
2. (~ (~ x str) str) ie x ~ str
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-13 19:19:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
A comment from Stewart Gordon:
> You mean make ~ right-associative? I think this'll break more code than
> it fixes.
>
> But implementing a comp
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-12 04:32:16 PST ---
A comment from Andrei Alexandrescu:
Walter, please don't forget to tweak the associativity rules: var ~ " literal "
~ " literal " concatenates literals first.
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-12 04:24:57 PST ---
Walter agrees:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=121830
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-10 18:21:06 PST ---
The C# language, that has a very refined design, refuses this code, showing
that it doesn't perform automatic joining of adjacent strings:
public class Test {
public s
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-10 18:17:17 PST ---
Another bug caused in my code by that anti-feature:
unittest {
auto tests = [["", ""], ["12346", ""], ["he", "H000"],
["soundex", "S532"], ["e
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-21 13:38:59 PDT ---
A particularly nice example of why untidy syntax easily leads to bugs (this
comes from two different sources of sloppiness of the D2 language):
enum string[5] data = ["gree
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-20 16:51:06 PDT ---
I know Python, but I hope D will become better than Python on this syntax
detail.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Ellery Newcomer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-20 16:19:15 PDT ---
The error message for the missing ~ can be something like this (adapted from
the "'l' suffix is deprecated, use 'L' instead" error message generated by the
usage of a 10l lon
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Alexey Ivanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aifg...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-02-18 15:03:33 PST ---
> Thank you. But is DMD doing the joining with ~ at compile time? If not, then
> you can add that optimization to your patch (if you are able to).
And if you think it's need
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-02-18 14:55:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=571) [details]
> patch for parse.c
>
> Vote++ and patch
Thank you. But is DMD doing the joining with ~ at compile time?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #1 from Alexey Ivanov 2010-02-18 14:35:32 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=571)
patch for parse.c
Vote++ and patch
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
31 matches
Mail list logo
