[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 Denis Shelomovskij changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALI

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2012-12-22 18:54:07 PST --- Attempting to extract your test case: -- 7z l linker-error.7z 7-Zip 9.20 Copyright (c) 1999-2010 Igor Pavlov 2010-11-18 Error: 7-Zip cannot find the

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #4 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-12-23 12:11:51 MSK --- (In reply to comment #3) > Attempting to extract your test case: > > -- > 7z l linker-error.7z > > 7-Zip 9.20 Copyright (c) 1999-2010 Igor Pavlov

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright 2012-12-23 12:13:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Common! 7-Zip has [one of] the best compression ratio, small compression time, > good GUI and explorer integration, so why not to use it? Who cares? File

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 Max Samukha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||samu...@voliacable.com --- Comment #6 fr

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1162|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comme

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #9 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-12-24 22:31:26 MSK --- (In reply to comment #8) > Please let's not go off-topic. > > I can't recreate the linker failure with git-head. I get the obj, lib, map and > exe file with no errors. > > Th

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #10 from Walter Bright 2012-12-25 03:31:43 PST --- Thank you, bearophile, for uploading the zip. I can't reproduce a problem, either. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #11 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-12-25 20:27:39 MSK --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thank you, bearophile, for uploading the zip. > > I can't reproduce a problem, either. Does it mean that it is a problem for you to work with e01

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #12 from Walter Bright 2012-12-26 03:18:19 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > Does it mean that it is a problem for you to work with > e01eb59f842dfe7a5275d96c420691c4a64f57f4 instead of HEAD? It works with both HEAD and e01eb59f

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #13 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-12-29 08:18:21 MSK --- (In reply to comment #12) > It works with both HEAD and e01eb59f842dfe7a5275d96c420691c4a64f57f4. > > I cannot reproduce this problem. Confirm. Looks like the problem is in

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #14 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-12-29 08:23:31 MSK --- Here is the full testcase (with phobos library file): http://deoma-cmd.ru/files/other/linker-error-full.zip (can not upload here because of its size (~1.2 MiB)) -- Configure

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2012-12-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #15 from Denis Shelomovskij 2012-12-29 08:25:24 MSK --- To disable the issue and make code linkable, you can e.g. remove any line from `c.d`. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Y

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2013-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #16 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-12 20:08:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) > Here is the full testcase (with phobos library file): > http://deoma-cmd.ru/files/other/linker-error-full.zip > (can not upload here because of its si

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2013-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #17 from Denis Shelomovskij 2013-01-13 10:00:02 MSK --- (In reply to comment #16) > Phobos of which commit? As I wrote in comment 13, I can't remember exact dmd/druntime/phobos commits used to build it. -- Configure issuemail: h

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2013-02-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #18 from Denis Shelomovskij 2013-02-17 10:24:50 MSK --- Created an attachment (id=1189) Almost unreduced sources Fails to link on every dmd/druntime/phobos commit I tried. It fails e.g.: dmd: 8f9ee7b112c644c4c2b830a4f9c79974196e37

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2013-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #19 from Denis Shelomovskij 2013-02-22 10:21:20 MSK --- Can somebody confirm link failure in the last test case? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail be

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2013-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com --- Comment #

[Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044 --- Comment #21 from Denis Shelomovskij 2013-03-11 12:56:43 MSK --- This is definitely a dmd bug, not OPTLINK as it is also triggered when building a library (when dmd doesn't call linker). `f` is a member function of a class: --- void f() {