yes:
> is it possible to make a dynamic array less dynamic?
> int[][] array;
> array[0].length = 10; //has to be set at runtime
> writefln(array[1].length); // writes also 10
> Because I now have to loop through the whole array to check for correct size.
If you are using normal D dynamic arrays y
Moritz Warning Wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:47:57 -0500, Sam Hu wrote:
>
> > Morning,
> >
> > Anybody can help?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sam
>
> try this:
>
> auto nameSet=new TreeBag!(char[])(null, (char[] first,char[] second) {
> return icompare(first,second);
> }
> );
bearophile wrote:
Bill Baxter:
The first time I tried to use it my thought was to do
typedef Exception MyException;
To create a different exception type. That doesn't work so I kinda
just said, eh whatever, this typedef stuff doesn't work yet.
You are right, typedef was invented before cla
Moritz Warning Wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:47:57 -0500, Sam Hu wrote:
>
> > Morning,
> >
> > Anybody can help?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sam
>
> try this:
>
> auto nameSet=new TreeBag!(char[])(null, (char[] first,char[] second) {
> return icompare(first,second);
> }
> );
yes wrote:
[snip]
also, can this be done?
int size;
size = 10; //runtime
void function( int[size][] array){}
No, static arrays are static, i.e. compile time.
I meant it to be an dynamic array argument, but that the function wouldn't need
to check the size of all the elements itself.
Dynam
>
> > Hello again
> >
> > is it possible to make a dynamic array less dynamic?
> >
> > int[][] array;
> >
> > array[0].length = 10; //has to be set at runtime
>
> Um, if that's your code, everything should crash at this point (or throw
> in debug mode): array is null, that is, empty, so there
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:17:54 -0500, yes wrote:
> Hello again
>
> is it possible to make a dynamic array less dynamic?
>
> int[][] array;
>
> array[0].length = 10; //has to be set at runtime
Um, if that's your code, everything should crash at this point (or throw
in debug mode): array is null, tha
Hello again
is it possible to make a dynamic array less dynamic?
int[][] array;
array[0].length = 10; //has to be set at runtime
writefln(array[1].length); // writes also 10
Because I now have to loop through the whole array to check for correct size.
also, can this be done?
int size;
size =
Bill Baxter:
> The first time I tried to use it my thought was to do
> typedef Exception MyException;
> To create a different exception type. That doesn't work so I kinda
> just said, eh whatever, this typedef stuff doesn't work yet.
You are right, typedef was invented before classes and OOP,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:39:55 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:04:38 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:31:51 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yep that probibly is a slight bug. What I would like to know is why
cant I do fo
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:04:38 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:31:51 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yep that probibly is a slight bug. What I would like to know is why
cant I do foreach with primitive types like I can with objects.
You can use foreach to itera
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:31:51 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yep that probibly is a slight bug. What I would like to know is why
cant I do foreach with primitive types like I can with objects.
You can use foreach to iterate over arrays and tuples, if that's what
you mean
12 matches
Mail list logo
