Put down the liquor bottle. I think you've had enough for one night.
"Jarrett Billingsley" wrote in message
news:mailman.272.1245123167.13405.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:26 PM, downs wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Derek Parnell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:53 -0400, Jarrett Bill
Robert Fraser wrote:
Has anyone been able to successfully link (statically) to a library
generated by MinGW? I compiled the libraries in question (FFMpeg avutil,
avformat, and avcodec) under MinGW, ran objconv on it to convert it to
OMF (no errors) and passed it to optlink along with MinGW's li
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:26 PM, downs wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Derek Parnell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:53 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>> I've actually given up trying to influence D ... the patricians have made
>>> it too hard to c
Has anyone been able to successfully link (statically) to a library
generated by MinGW? I compiled the libraries in question (FFMpeg avutil,
avformat, and avcodec) under MinGW, ran objconv on it to convert it to
OMF (no errors) and passed it to optlink along with MinGW's libgcc. At
this point I
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Derek Parnell wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:53 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> I've actually given up trying to influence D ... the patricians have made
>> it too hard to contribute and I've haven't got *that* much free time.
> So have I. But we can at least still shout.
Please do
Kagamin wrote:
> The Duff's device is said to be an optimization, but I get blunt device only
> 0.7% slower.
Read Duff’s post: “this loop was the bottleneck in a real-time animation
playback program”, and all the Device is doing is unwinding the loop a
few times. Optimization comes because — on
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:53 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>
>> I am sorry for everything.
>
> Who are you, and what have you done to the real JB?
>
> LOL ... thanks for this morning chuckle ... unless of course you're serious
> ... in wh
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:53 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> I am sorry for everything.
Who are you, and what have you done to the real JB?
LOL ... thanks for this morning chuckle ... unless of course you're serious
... in which case I don't get it. Maybe I'm too much like yourself??
I've a
I am sorry for everything.
I am sorry for the negativity.
I am sorry for the lack of faith in the the qualifications and skills
of the leaders of D.
I am sorry for shooting down so many ideas; for treating people who
are new to the language as subhuman; for I was once new to the
language, and di
Ellery Newcomer:
> How DO you define the signature of a function that returns itself?
You may need a language with a type system more powerful than D type system
(like Scala?).
> And FYI, dmd handles your particular example recursively just fine. But
> you probably know that.
I don't understa
Hello Saaa,
Ever heard of recursion?
Why don't you simply handle all types recursively?
I'm still very interested in what exactly that means. Could you
maybe give a small example?
int Index(T)(T arr, int[] ind)
{
static if(is(T B == B[][])) // if array of array
return Index!(B[])(arr[ind[0]
>>> Ever heard of recursion?
>>>
>>> Why don't you simply handle all types recursively?
>>>
>> I'm still very interested in what exactly that means. Could you maybe
>> give a small example?
>>
>
> int Index(T)(T arr, int[] ind)
> {
> static if(is(T B == B[][])) // if array of array
> return I
Derek Parnell wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:06:24 +1200, Tim Matthews wrote:
Derek Parnell wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:16:51 + (UTC), Michal Minich wrote:
Is there any tool for Linux that can parse imports of files and invoke
compiler with all project files? (And preferably one which d
15 matches
Mail list logo
