"Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
news:i47vkc$2vb...@digitalmars.com...
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:58:05 +0200, simendsjo wrote:
>
>> c:\temp\src\test.d
>>
>> c:\temp>rdmd src\test
>> The system cannot find the path specified.
>>
>> c:\temp>rdmd src/test
>> std.file.FileException: (...)\.rdmd\
Andrej Mitrovic:
> Well, honestly, I would never use this flexibility to begin with. I'm not
> seeing much benefits in having modules named in one way while keeping them
> disorganized and in completely different folders. That just causes confusion,
> for both the programmer and the build tools
Thanks, that works.
Interesting how it's pretty much a 1:1 translation from the MSDN documentation
to D code. I'm going to give more of these functions a try.
Yao G. Wrote:
>
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:23:23 -0500, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Thanks, that works.
Interesting how it's pretty much a 1:1 translation from the MSDN
documentation to D code.
Yes. And in fact, that's what I did ;) I just copied/pasted the struct
and function definition from the MSDN page. T
"Andrej Mitrovic" wrote in message
news:i4rnl4$239...@digitalmars.com...
> Well then I think I've found some new bugs in RDMD & xfbuild:
>
> Files:
> root/main.d
> root/socket.d
>
> main.d:
> module main;
>
> import alt.socket;
>
> void main()
> {
>foo();
> }
>
> socket.d:
> module alt.socket
> but it's not nice, maybe you can improve it, I have had to use a delegate
> because
> I have found a forward reference problem (I am not sure if it's worth for
> Bugzilla):
This was one problem, but maybe there are other ones:
struct Foo(alias f) {}
Foo!main baz;
void main() {}
I have added
On 22/08/2010 20:57, bearophile wrote:
> Bob Cowdery:
>> Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
>> not available. Thanks for the thought.
> That links works for me :-)
> Be happy, bye,
> bearophile
Works if I paste it but not straight from the email,odd.
I see.
Well, honestly, I would never use this flexibility to begin with. I'm not
seeing much benefits in having modules named in one way while keeping them
disorganized and in completely different folders. That just causes confusion,
for both the programmer and the build tools.
Personally, I'l
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:36:50 -0500, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
I did a mistake in the code.
If you want to use the UTF-8 version of GetVersionInfoEx, declare it like
this:
BOOL GetVersionExA( LPOSVERSIONINFO lpVersionInfo );
alias GetVersionExA GetVersionEx;
And make the change to the T
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:36:50 -0500, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
There's an example of a module constructor in TDPL. I don't think it's
supossed to compile as it is, but I wanted to try it out anyway.
I need a way to call the windows c function GetVersionEx. A grep through
the source files doe
Bob Cowdery:
> Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
> not available. Thanks for the thought.
That links works for me :-)
Be happy, bye,
bearophile
Mafi:
> I am not able to instatiate ths template in any way.
You are doing it wrong. Such template tricks are not easy to get right, so
probably the best thing you may do is to start from an empty program that
works, and then keep adding to it, and keep it working, until you reach
something goo
On 21/08/2010 22:41, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> On 21.08.2010 23:07, Bob Cowdery wrote:
>> For me at least I'm wondering if it stacks up. Linux support seems
>> secondary (correct me if I'm wrong). The only painless way to use C
>> libraries is as dll's and even then the import library must be convert
There's an example of a module constructor in TDPL. I don't think it's supossed
to compile as it is, but I wanted to try it out anyway.
I need a way to call the windows c function GetVersionEx. A grep through the
source files doesn't find it (except in the DMD cpp backend which it internally
us
On 22/08/2010 00:54, div0 wrote:
> On 21/08/2010 22:07, Bob Cowdery wrote:
>> On 20/08/2010 18:44, div0 wrote:
>>> On 20/08/2010 09:17, Bob Cowdery wrote:
I'm still concerned it's a bit too soon as a lot of things seem to be
either Windows or Linux (cmake says its only tested for
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:49:26 -0500, Blonder
wrote:
I am looking for a floor/ceil function in D, is there an equivalent
function, I haven't found any yet.
Floor: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_math.html#floor
Ceil: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_math.html#ceil
--
Yao G.
Hello,
I am looking for a floor/ceil function in D, is there an equivalent function,
I haven't found any yet.
Thanks.
Hey,
I've written some caching template which should cache the return values.
It looks like this:
//
template cached(F : R function(P), R, P...) {
R cached(P p) {
static R[Tuple!(P)] cache = [];
R* pointer = Tuple!(P)(p) in cache;
if(pointer !is null) {
Well then I think I've found some new bugs in RDMD & xfbuild:
Files:
root/main.d
root/socket.d
main.d:
module main;
import alt.socket;
void main()
{
foo();
}
socket.d:
module alt.socket;
import std.stdio : writeln;
void foo()
{
writeln("test");
}
$ RDMD main.d
main.d(2): Error: mod
Am 22.08.2010 16:39, schrieb Andrej Mitrovic:
That's very interesting.
But wouldn't that cause problems if you're using package labels in some of those modules?
AFAIK package gives access to all files in the current directory, so even if you
"move" a module by changing the module declaration,
That's very interesting.
But wouldn't that cause problems if you're using package labels in some of
those modules? AFAIK package gives access to all files in the current
directory, so even if you "move" a module by changing the module declaration,
the files in the current directory will still
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Doh! I swear I've read somewhere that a module declaration needs to have
> the same name as the *file name*. I didn't know I had to add the path as
> well. That makes the modules work now.
>
> In fact, I probably just read this one line in the docs:
>
> "The ModuleDeclar
22 matches
Mail list logo
