On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:09:05 +, div0 wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 10:14, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:47:37 +, div0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/11/2010 09:32, spir wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way for a program to simply exit before end of main()? An
instruction l
On 07/11/2010 10:42, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:09:05 +, div0 wrote:
On 05/11/2010 10:14, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:47:37 +, div0 wrote:
On 05/11/2010 09:32, spir wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way for a program to simply exit before end of
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:50:05 -0400
bearophile wrote:
> spir:
>
> > class SC {
> > string f = "SC";
> > void show() {writeln(this.f);}
> > }
> > class C : SC {
> > string f = "C";
> > }
> > void main () {
> > auto c = new C();
> > writeln(c.f) ; // OK, got "C"
> > c.show(
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:00:04 +
div0 wrote:
> OIC, that makes sense. I guess people should be discourged from using
> the C bits anyway; there ought to be better D versions of everyting in
> the C standard lib.
That make sense; or at least have the ones that need no improvement
transparent
Hello,
Say I have some subclasses of Pattern. When I try to write
Pattern[] patterns = [x,y,z];
I get an error because, apparently, D types the array according to the class of
z (Choice is here the type of z):
DeeMatch.d(473): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type
Dee
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:17:38 +0100
spir wrote:
And I'd like to know, as a possible workaround, if there is a way to save a
variadic arg list:
class C {
??? xs;
this(X xs...) {
this.xs = xs;
}
}
Denis
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
vit ess
spir Wrote:
> I just realised that what I was asking for is in fact class-level fields --
> common to all instances, instead of each instance having it locally.
>
Maybe you know the answer to that, but just in case you would use a static
variable.
class SC {
static string f = "SC";
spir Wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Say I have some subclasses of Pattern. When I try to write
> Pattern[] patterns = [x,y,z];
> I get an error because, apparently, D types the array according to the class
> of z (Choice is here the type of z):
>
> DeeMatch.d(473): Error: cannot implicitly conver
spir Wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:17:38 +0100
> spir wrote:
>
> And I'd like to know, as a possible workaround, if there is a way to save a
> variadic arg list:
> class C {
> ??? xs;
> this(X xs...) {
> this.xs = xs;
> }
> }
>
> Denis
>
On 07.11.2010 18:49, spir wrote:
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:17:38 +0100
spir wrote:
And I'd like to know, as a possible workaround, if there is a way to save a
variadic arg list:
class C {
??? xs;
this(X xs...) {
this.xs = xs;
}
}
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:29:40 +0300
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> On 07.11.2010 18:49, spir wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:17:38 +0100
> > spir wrote:
> >
> > And I'd like to know, as a possible workaround, if there is a way to save a
> > variadic arg list:
> > class C {
> > ??? xs;
>
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:24:37 -0500
Jesse Phillips wrote:
> > And I'd like to know, as a possible workaround, if there is a way to save a
> > variadic arg list:
> > class C {
> > ??? xs;
> > this(X xs...) {
> > this.xs = xs;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Denis
>
spir Wrote:
> No, in fact a variadic param list is not an array -- this is according to
> TDPL an iternal type of the language. Trying to assign it to an X[] var
> throws:
> DeeMatch.d(371): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (patterns) of
> type DeeMatch.Pattern to Pattern[]
> Well, a
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:08:17 -0500
Jesse Phillips wrote:
> spir Wrote:
>
> > No, in fact a variadic param list is not an array -- this is according to
> > TDPL an iternal type of the language. Trying to assign it to an X[] var
> > throws:
> > DeeMatch.d(371): Error: cannot implicitly convert e
spir wrote:
Hello,
Say I have some subclasses of Pattern. When I try to write
Pattern[] patterns = [x,y,z];
I get an error because, apparently, D types the array according to the class of
z (Choice is here the type of z):
DeeMatch.d(473): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x
%u wrote:
Yay, free access to a!
I searched for this bug in the bug-reports..
Why are there so many basic import bugs?
There's only really one. But it's huge.
Don:
> There's only really one. But it's huge.
Really? :-) I didn't know this. (You are very often right, but I have a hard
time believing this).
Bye,
bearophile
On 07/11/2010 15:49, spir wrote:
And I'd like to know, as a possible workaround, if there is a way to save a
variadic arg list:
class C {
??? xs;
this(X xs...) {
this.xs = xs;
}
}
What exactly are you trying to do here?
If y
18 matches
Mail list logo
