On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:35:42 +0100
spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
I finally found the bit where it describes associative array literals
and they look identical to initialising a flat array, so god only knows
which one gets picked when. It would be better if they where made
different.
Is there a way to get use constructors with traits functions that take a
function? For instance, functionAttributes!(func) takes a func and tells you
whether it's pure, nothrow, etc. However, giving it the type doesn't work (i.e.
functionAttributes!T), and giving it this doesn't work (i.e.
On 2010-11-11 17:21, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
First, you can't forward-declare classes in one file that are defined in
another file, instead of importing. The reason is because in D, the
module is the namespace that the class is declared in.
So for instance, when you define IStudent in
Hello,
There seems to be 2 main differences between structs classes:
1. structs instances are direct values, implement value semantics; while class
instances are referenced (actually pointed)
2. classes can be subtyped/subclassed in a simple way; structs cannot be really
subtyped -- but there
On 12/11/2010 16:19, Michal Minich wrote:
V Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:14:30 +0100, Carlo wrote:
Sorry if I bother you again with this probably silly problem. Here is
the point. I want to call the D function fun from a .c file:
\\file libforc.d
extern (C) int fun(int x,int y){
return x;
}
On Sunday 14 November 2010 03:08:49 spir wrote:
Hello,
There seems to be 2 main differences between structs classes:
1. structs instances are direct values, implement value semantics; while
class instances are referenced (actually pointed) 2. classes can be
subtyped/subclassed in a
Hello,
Is there a way to check the runtime type of an element? Meaning, for instance,
process differently according to the actual type in a hierarchy?
class C {}
class C1 : C {int i;}
bool checkTypeC1 (C c) {
return is(typeof(c) == C1);
}
void main () {
C1 c1 = new C1();
spir:
a value makes no sense by itself, it is bound to what it describes an aspect
of; referencing a value is meaningless, only copy makes no sense. For
instance, the position color of a visual form should be values.
Structs may have a meaning by themselves, all kind of member functions,
On 14/11/2010 11:08, spir wrote:
Hello,
There seems to be 2 main differences between structs classes:
1. structs instances are direct values, implement value semantics;
while class instances are referenced (actually pointed)
2. classes can be subtyped/subclassed in a simple way; structs
On Sunday 14 November 2010 03:45:12 spir wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to check the runtime type of an element? Meaning, for
instance, process differently according to the actual type in a hierarchy?
class C {}
class C1 : C {int i;}
bool checkTypeC1 (C c) {
return is(typeof(c) ==
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 03:32:18 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Sunday 14 November 2010 03:08:49 spir wrote:
Hello,
There seems to be 2 main differences between structs classes:
1. structs instances are direct values, implement value semantics; while
class
spir:
Only partial answers, other answers left to other people.
Is there a way to check the runtime type of an element? Meaning, for
instance, process differently according to the actual type in a hierarchy?
You may use a cast(). If it return null then it's not castable.
Also, I would
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:02:35 +
div0 d...@sourceforge.net wrote:
Both of these points may conflict with semantic considerations above:
we may want to use structs for fast creation, but if ever they mean
things, we must think at referencing them manually and/or using
ref parameters.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:09:22 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
If you are dealing with a class hierarchy and you want to know whether a base
class reference referes to a particular derived class object, I believe that
the
correct way to do it is cast it to the derived type
On Sunday 14 November 2010 04:14:29 spir wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 03:32:18 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Sunday 14 November 2010 03:08:49 spir wrote:
Hello,
There seems to be 2 main differences between structs classes:
1. structs instances are
On 2010-11-13 18:27, div0 wrote:
On 13/11/2010 15:49, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-13 14:56, div0 wrote:
On 13/11/2010 11:02, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-12 17:44, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Should be. Are you having problems?
(I don't use them much, but fwiw, it seems like tango had
spir wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:02:35 +
div0 d...@sourceforge.net wrote:
Both of these points may conflict with semantic considerations above:
we may want to use structs for fast creation, but if ever they mean
things, we must think at referencing them manually and/or using
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:16, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Is there a way to get use constructors with traits functions that take a
function? For instance, functionAttributes!(func) takes a func and tells you
whether it's pure, nothrow, etc. However, giving it the type doesn't
Hello Jonathan,
On Sunday 14 November 2010 03:45:12 spir wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to check the runtime type of an element? Meaning, for
instance, process differently according to the actual type in a
hierarchy?
class C {}
class C1 : C {int i;}
bool checkTypeC1 (C c) {
return
Hello bearophile,
In a not-ranged cases body, like in the program below (that doesn't
compile), the switch variable is a compile-time constant, so why
doesn't the compile see x as constant there?
template Foo(uint x) {
static if (x = 1)
enum Foo = 1;
else
enum Foo = x * Foo!(x - 1);
}
int
Hi
I copied a module because I am changing its form. The original is still
in the build but is a different package and class name. The closest
thing I can think it might be talking about is this line:
x_points[] =
I experience the exact same problem on Windows 7 64-bit.
import std.stdio;
int main() {
char[] buf;
while (stdin.readln(buf))
write(buf);
return 0;
}
If compiled as test.exe, running the following command:
echo test line 1 | test
Produces the following result:
On 11/12/2010 02:03 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Pelle, I spent all this time helping him, and you swoop in with the
answer :)
I was in a rush when answering, causing the swoopiness of my post. :-)
I only knew the answer because I had almost exactly the same bug a week
ago, or so.
On Sunday 14 November 2010 07:13:43 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:16, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Is there a way to get use constructors with traits functions that take a
function? For instance, functionAttributes!(func) takes a func and tells
you whether
24 matches
Mail list logo
