Jonathan M Davis, thank you for explanation,
but i am on windows :(
On Sunday 20 February 2011 22:11:13 novice2 wrote:
> Christian Köstlin Wrote:
> > unfortunately not ... I looked several minutes at the stacktrace (would
>
> i am sorry for offtopic, but
> how you produce stacktrace? sometime i very want to see it...
1. It doesn't work on Windows yet, I don't bel
On Sunday 20 February 2011 21:26:05 Bekenn wrote:
> Is there a wstring version of string.format? I can't seem to find it
> anywhere...
There probably isn't one. A lot of functions are string-only and do not work
with char[], wchar[], dchar[], wstring, or dstring. That may or may not change
in t
Christian Köstlin Wrote:
> unfortunately not ... I looked several minutes at the stacktrace (would
i am sorry for offtopic, but
how you produce stacktrace? sometime i very want to see it...
Is there a wstring version of string.format? I can't seem to find it
anywhere...
"Jesse Phillips" wrote in message
news:ij2drt$1mq3$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Magic.
>
> No really, the best I can tell is that the compiler will try to run the
> foreach loop at compile-time if there is something in the body that must
> be evaluated at compile time.
>
Actually this happens b
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:23:14 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Simon" wrote in message
news:ijrdif$1nn6$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 20/02/2011 14:59, d coder wrote:
Greetings
I tried to initialize a struct member with a function pointer, and
found that DMD2 did not like it. Are not function poi
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:10:28 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-20 21:30, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:40:08 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm confused about how someone can implement a library like this.
Every time I try to use D2 it's just a PITA to use. I've u
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5630
Steven Schveighoffer:
> Just a blind guess, I have not tested, but maybe it's because the compiler
> is using const(char) as the return type for your delegate literal since
> you never specify one?
Right, this works:
import std.stdio, std.random, std.string, std.algorithm, std.range;
void ma
I'm using the regex module in Phobos and getting the following runtime
exception:
regex.d(339): *+? not allowed in atom
What does that mean and what's an "atom" in this case?
I'm using DMD 2.052 on Mac OS X.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-02-20 21:30, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:40:08 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm confused about how someone can implement a library like this.
Every time I try to use D2 it's just a PITA to use. I've used D1 and
Tango for several years and had no problem with th
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:ijs1vp$3b3$1...@digitalmars.com...
> "Magnus Lie Hetland" wrote in message
> news:ijrm9q$259n$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> On 2011-02-19 22:25:31 +0100, Nick Sabalausky said:
>>
>> [snip]
>>> Unfortunately, rdmd doesn't seem to have gotten much attention la
"Magnus Lie Hetland" wrote in message
news:ijrm9q$259n$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2011-02-19 22:25:31 +0100, Nick Sabalausky said:
>
> [snip]
>> Unfortunately, rdmd doesn't seem to have gotten much attention lately.
>> I've had a few patches for it sitting in bugzilla for a number of months.
"Simon" wrote in message
news:ijrdif$1nn6$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 20/02/2011 14:59, d coder wrote:
>> Greetings
>>
>> I tried to initialize a struct member with a function pointer, and
>> found that DMD2 did not like it. Are not function pointers compile
>> time constants? And why they shoul
On 20.02.2011 23:34, Martin Kinkelin wrote:
Hi again,
I just came across something odd - if the aggregate expression in a
foreach statement constructs a new struct (returning an rvalue), it
isn't finalized (well, to be precise, its implicit copy isn't).
Test:
--
import std.stdio;
struc
Hehe, thx for deflating and pointing in the right direction.
Hi again,
I just came across something odd - if the aggregate expression in a
foreach statement constructs a new struct (returning an rvalue), it
isn't finalized (well, to be precise, its implicit copy isn't).
Test:
--
import std.stdio;
struct A
{
int[3] _data;
string _name;
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:40:08 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm confused about how someone can implement a library like this. Every
time I try to use D2 it's just a PITA to use. I've used D1 and Tango for
several years and had no problem with that.
Strings are a sore spot for me, I think
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:51:10 -0500, bearophile
wrote:
Jacob Carlborg:
Every time I try to use D2 it's just a PITA to use. I've used D1 and
Tango for
several years and had no problem with that.
I use this thread to ask regarding one specific little problem I have
with strings. I want t
Jacob Carlborg:
> Every time I try to use D2 it's just a PITA to use. I've used D1 and Tango
> for
> several years and had no problem with that.
I use this thread to ask regarding one specific little problem I have with
strings. I want to generate a random string of AB using the array, map, et
On 2011-02-20 17:12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:45:36 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-19 23:20, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:23:12 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Compiling the following code with DMD 2.052 on Mac OS X:
import std.array;
On 2011-02-19 22:25:31 +0100, Nick Sabalausky said:
[snip]
Unfortunately, rdmd doesn't seem to have gotten much attention lately.
I've had a few patches for it sitting in bugzilla for a number of
months. (Not that I'm complaning, I realize there's been other
priorities.)
I see. Kind of surpr
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:15:06 -0500, Martin Kinkelin wrote:
I came to the same conclusion. Even if Parent is a struct, it may get
destructed after its Child (e.g., in case the Parent struct is a field
of another class).
What I did is to use a custom allocator for Child, so that Child
instances a
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:45:36 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-19 23:20, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:23:12 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Compiling the following code with DMD 2.052 on Mac OS X:
import std.array;
void main ()
{
char[] a;
char[] b;
a.replace(1, 3
Thanks Simon.
On 20/02/2011 14:59, d coder wrote:
Greetings
I tried to initialize a struct member with a function pointer, and
found that DMD2 did not like it. Are not function pointers compile
time constants? And why they should not be?
Regards
- Cherry
No a function doesn't have an address until the .exe
Greetings
I tried to initialize a struct member with a function pointer, and
found that DMD2 did not like it. Are not function pointers compile
time constants? And why they should not be?
Regards
- Cherry
== Auszug aus spir (denis.s...@gmail.com)'s Artikel
> On 02/19/2011 02:42 PM, Nrgyzer wrote:
> > == Auszug aus Stewart Gordon (smjg_1...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
> >> On 13/02/2011 21:49, Nrgyzer wrote:
> >>
> >>> It compiles and works as long as the returned char-array/string
of f.readLine() doesn't
On 2011-02-19 23:20, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:23:12 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Compiling the following code with DMD 2.052 on Mac OS X:
import std.array;
void main ()
{
char[] a;
char[] b;
a.replace(1, 3, b);
}
Results in the following error:
test.d(7): Error: t
On Sunday 20 February 2011 05:36:25 spir wrote:
> On 02/20/2011 04:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 February 2011 19:12:17 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> On Saturday 19 February 2011 19:01:16 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:55:53 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
> >>>
On 02/20/2011 04:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 19 February 2011 19:12:17 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 19 February 2011 19:01:16 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:55:53 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday 19 February 2011 18:26:25 Steven Schveighoff
On Sunday 20 February 2011 04:10:18 Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Yes. You're right. They can reference the non-GC heap just fine. It's
> > just that
> > they can't reference the GC heap - probably because the destructor order
> > is
> > indeterminate and so that the GC doesn
I came to the same conclusion. Even if Parent is a struct, it may get
destructed after its Child (e.g., in case the Parent struct is a field
of another class).
What I did is to use a custom allocator for Child, so that Child
instances are not managed by the GC:
--
import std.stdio;
import
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yes. You're right. They can reference the non-GC heap just fine. It's
just that
they can't reference the GC heap - probably because the destructor order
is
indeterminate and so that the GC doesn't have to worry about dealing with
circular references between garbage c
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:55:53 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 19 February 2011 18:26:25 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> I was working on an I/O library that I plan to use in development,
>>> and possibly submit to phobos, and I thought of this case.
>>>
On 19-Feb-11 6:53 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Joel Christensen Wrote:
I'm using some one else's bindings to a C library.
The problem seems to be limited to D2 programs.
Error as follows:
An exception was thrown while finalizing an instance of class jec2.bmp.Bmp
I also get other errors at progr
37 matches
Mail list logo
