E.g. this code:
class Foo
{
int wndProc(uint msg, int wParam, int lParam) { return 0; }
}
class Bar : Foo
{
override int wndProc(uint msg, int wParam, int lParam)
{
switch(msg)
{
case 1:
return 1;
default:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:37:15 -0400, Caligo wrote:
> > It's just frustrating, that's all. Writing thousands of lines of code
> > and having everything stop because of a compiler bug is just
> > frustrating.
>
> I completely understand. It's why I have to periodically stop using D.
> Dcollectio
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:37:15 -0400, Caligo wrote:
It's just frustrating, that's all. Writing thousands of lines of code
and having everything stop because of a compiler bug is just
frustrating.
I completely understand. It's why I have to periodically stop using D.
Dcollections sat idle f
It's just frustrating, that's all. Writing thousands of lines of code
and having everything stop because of a compiler bug is just
frustrating.
I know progress is being made, and all that is appreciated. But, I
don't remember ever hearing anything about D2 being in beta. If
anything, I remember
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:20:02 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > toSimpleString (which toString calls) does give the short version of the
> > month
> > in it, but during the review process, a number of the folks reviewing
> > it were
> > against putting code in there relating to printing the
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:20:02 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
toSimpleString (which toString calls) does give the short version of the
month
in it, but during the review process, a number of the folks reviewing
it were
against putting code in there relating to printing the month out as a
> On 04/05/2011 03:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
> >> added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
> >> 'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
> >>
> >> Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a
On 04/05/2011 03:40 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote:
> > I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
> > added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
> > 'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
> >
> > Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a
On 04/05/2011 03:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that
should w
> I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
> added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
> 'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
>
> Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that
> should work for me?
std.datetime was complete
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:40:12 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string th
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that
should work for me?
-Kai Meyer
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:48:36 -0400, Caligo wrote:
I searched the bugzilla and there are 'alias this' related bugs. Some
of them are 2 years old and have not been fixed.
There are many bugs in that category. inout I think is a prime example.
I don't really know what to say to appease your e
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:24:46 -0400, simendsjo
wrote:
I don't know if this is an actual problem, but I don't understand the
behavior.
When one slice calls assumeSafeAppend, both slices is "given control",
that is, gets the parents capacity.
You have to stop thinking of array slices as unique :
I searched the bugzilla and there are 'alias this' related bugs. Some
of them are 2 years old and have not been fixed.
I've heard bugs get fixed rather quickly if something is posted on
reddit about them.
I don't know if this is an actual problem, but I don't understand the
behavior.
When one slice calls assumeSafeAppend, both slices is "given control",
that is, gets the parents capacity.
It's best explained with an example:
int[] a;
a.length = 4;
int[] b = a[0..1];
What's strange is that
auto r3 = r1 + r2;
works. Bug indeed...
>
> I get a "untitled.d(32): Error: template instance ElementType!(listR) does not
> match template declaration ElementType(R)" error.
>
> What could be the problem ?
> --
>
> import std.stdio;
> import std.range;
> import std.
On 4/5/11, Kagamin wrote:
> toUTF16z
> it was in windows examples somewhere, I suppose.
>
Great, it's in std.utf. Thanks!
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:08:42 -0400, Caligo wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:23:04 -0400, Caligo
wrote:
Why does the last expression fail? and how do I fix it?
Because alias this is not very well implemented yet (I've run into
> thanks for your answer. If it is that complicated if I prefer explicit
> specialization, I think. But I do not quite understand that it is not
> possible to achieve this with a simple "is" expression (without a
> function like "isAnA" and using "__traits") as the D language reference
> includes a
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:23:04 -0400, Caligo wrote:
>
>> Why does the last expression fail? and how do I fix it?
>
> Because alias this is not very well implemented yet (I've run into similar
> issues), and you fix it by creating a bug
I can use the ElementType() template in the std.rane library to find the type
of the elements of a range,isn't it? But I cant compile the following programme.
I get a "untitled.d(32): Error: template instance ElementType!(listR) does not
match template declaration ElementType(R)" error.
What coul
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:24:49 -0400, Regan Heath
wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:23:28 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
assert("" !is null); // works on D. Try it.
Yes, but that's because this is a string literal. It's not useful where
you're getting your input from somewhere else..
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:23:04 -0400, Caligo wrote:
Why does the last expression fail? and how do I fix it?
Because alias this is not very well implemented yet (I've run into similar
issues), and you fix it by creating a bug report or voting for an already
existing one.
Sorry.
-Steve
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:23:28 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:52:47 -0400, Regan Heath
wrote:
But, in D it seems I cannot do this. In D I would have to pass an
additional boolean parameter, or add another level of indirection i.e.
pass a string[]*. The same prob
import std.conv : to;
struct Matrix(T, size_t r, size_t c){
public:
T[r*c] _data;
Matrix opBinary(string op)(T scalar) if(op == "*"){
string construct(){
string result = "[";
for(size_t i = 0; i < r * c; i++)
result ~= "_data["~to!string(i)~"] * scalar, ";
retur
Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
> I think I'd need a toWStringz function, or maybe toStringz can be made more
> clever and figure out that I'm passing a wstring and return a null-terminated
> wchar*.
>
> Currently I'm using wstrings and appending the null terminator by hand, e.g.:
>
> wstring appName
Am 03.04.2011 16:11, schrieb Philippe Sigaud:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 13:05, enuhtac wrote:
>> This is the type I would like to check for:
>>
>> struct A( T, string s )
>> { ... };
> Hi,
>
> the trick is to use a function do the work for you. Let's define isAnA:
>
> void isAnA(T, string s)( A!(T,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Bug 620[1] is related to what you ask. I have written a solution there,
> but I do not remember how well it works, and have no way of testing it
> currently:
>
> template opDispatch( string name ) {
> auto opDispatch( T... )( T args ) {
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
