On 2011-10-20 00:59, Trass3r wrote:
Am 20.10.2011, 00:06 Uhr, schrieb Sean Silva :
== Quote from Jesse Phillips (jessekphillip...@gmail.com)'s article
Right now D isn't ready to be used in this fashion
It looks there's a more-or-less functional kernel written in D (and
pretty well documented
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:39:47 -0400, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.v3lug2q2eav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:40:12 -0400, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.v3h06olweav7ka@localhost.localdomain
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.v3lug2q2eav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:40:12 -0400, Daniel Murphy
> wrote:
>
>> "Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
>> news:op.v3h06olweav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
>>>
>>> That sounds like an incorrect restriction
Am 20.10.2011, 00:06 Uhr, schrieb Sean Silva :
== Quote from Jesse Phillips (jessekphillip...@gmail.com)'s article
Right now D isn't ready to be used in this fashion
It looks there's a more-or-less functional kernel written in D (and
pretty well documented too):
http://wiki.xomb.org/index.php?
== Quote from Jesse Phillips (jessekphillip...@gmail.com)'s article
> Right now D isn't ready to be used in this fashion
It looks there's a more-or-less functional kernel written in D (and
pretty well documented too):
http://wiki.xomb.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
Thanks Adam. :-) It seems to be working now, with the stuff you gave me.
I was thinking of making a text file from it that my programs can load
from. avoiding the xml file, so they load faster. But I think I'll have
my program(s) use the xml file each time they're run, in the mean time.
On 10/19/2011 06:22 AM, Jay Norwood wrote:
can someone propose the appropriate D features or libraries that would
support a native D implementation of the ropes structures described in this Sgi
C++ library.
http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/Rope.html
From the library
std.range -Iteration
std.co
On 2011-10-19 16:36, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Jacob Carlborg:
Why not just cache the generated HTML and let Apache handle it.
That sounds hard... configuring Apache to do anything beyond the most
trivial of tasks is a huge pain to me.
No, it's not that hard. Just add a couple of rewrite-rules that
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:40:12 -0400, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.v3h06olweav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
That sounds like an incorrect restriction. The implicit cast to
immutable
should depend on whether the function being *called* qualifies, not if
Jacob Carlborg:
> Why not just cache the generated HTML and let Apache handle it.
That sounds hard... configuring Apache to do anything beyond the most
trivial of tasks is a huge pain to me.
It is easy to call "cgi.setCache(true);" though.
> Then it doesn't even need to start the application if
I found std.xml useless too, so I wrote my own lib.
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
Grab dom.d from there. First, convert your file to UTF-8. My lib
might work for you, but it assumes utf-8 so it will throw if it actually
encounters a non-ascii
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:21:22 +1300, Joel Christensen wrote:
> I think I want to stick with the current std xml library for now.
>
> I think the books example is too different for me to work for what I
> want.
std.xml has had many bugs, and hasn't had most of them fixed. It might
work for your d
Andrea Fontana:
> other http methods have nothing special
Indeed. The only thing that might get you is if the data's
content type is different than the default.
That's possible on POST too, though, so still nothing special.
My cgi library has an enum to tell you what the requestMethod is,
and it
can someone propose the appropriate D features or libraries that would
support a native D implementation of the ropes structures described in this Sgi
C++ library.
http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/Rope.html
AFAIK other http methods have nothing special. You have just to
implement on your code:
if (request.method == "PUT")
{
...
...
}
if you need them. Am i wrong?
Il giorno mer, 19/10/2011 alle 08.36 +0200, Jacob Carlborg ha scritto:
> On 2011-10-18 19:24, Jeremy Sandell wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:45:29 +1300, Joel Christensen wrote:
> I don't care to learn xml at this stage.
What do you mean by "learn xml"? I'm saying std.xml is a terrible
library, and furthermore will be deprecated sooner or later. Use another
library. There is already a suggestion in this threa
I don't care to learn xml at this stage. I just want to use it on that
Bible file.
On 19-Oct-11 8:03 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I think I want to stick with the current std xml library for now.
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:04:53 +, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> meen
Just not my day, is it?
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:03:05 +, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> and the power of Satan*
Err, I can see how that could be construed as in poor taste, considering
the subject matter of the XML document. I meen no offense. >_<
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:21:22 +1300, Joel Christensen wrote:
> I think I want to stick with the current std xml library for now.
No, you don't. It's a terrible library, held together by lashings of hate
and the power of Satan*
*only half kidding
20 matches
Mail list logo
