On 1/6/2012 2:34 PM, Puming wrote:
In http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html it says in 32bit system c_long is
equivalent to `long long` in C. Is this wrong?
Well, either the documentation is wrong or the implementation is. Looks
like one for Bugzilla.
thank you, you answer is very helpful.
Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/6/2012 2:34 PM, Puming wrote:
In http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html it says in 32bit system c_long is
equivalent to `long long` in C. Is this wrong?
Well, either the documentation is wrong or the implementation is. Looks
like one for Bugzilla.
The documentation
On 29/12/2011 19:09, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
snip excessive quote
Could druntime hook up on the atexit function to run destructors and similar
when the
program exits?
I'm not sure. Maybe it could be called upon to run static destructors and destruct
heap-allocated objects. But in order to
That should have been int main.
Hi All,
As I understand it, compile-time execution *should* be able to evaluate
floating-point functions, correct? Currently, I have this code:
private static real cross_angles[6] = [
real.nan,
real.nan,
real.nan,
On 06-01-2012 23:21, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Hi All,
As I understand it, compile-time execution *should* be able to evaluate
floating-point functions, correct? Currently, I have this code:
private static real cross_angles[6] = [
real.nan,
real.nan,
On Saturday, January 07, 2012 00:03:39 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Most likely those functions are just implemented using inline assembly,
therefore not usable in CTFE.
Yeah, several functions in std.math use inline assembly. So, for them to be
able to be used at compile time, either the
On 01/06/2012 03:37 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
An enhancement request for it should probably be opened: d.puremagi.com/issues
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
Ali
On 07-01-2012 00:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, January 07, 2012 00:03:39 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Most likely those functions are just implemented using inline assembly,
therefore not usable in CTFE.
Yeah, several functions in std.math use inline assembly. So, for them to be
able
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:49:46AM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 07-01-2012 00:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, January 07, 2012 00:03:39 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Most likely those functions are just implemented using inline
assembly, therefore not usable in CTFE.
Yeah,
On 5/01/12 5:26 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
The first call doesn't do anything because the delegate is wrapped
inside of another delegate. I want this template to be versatile
enough to be used by both lazy expressions and delegate literals, but
I don't know how.
void test(T)(lazy T dg)
{
On 7/01/12 1:19 AM, Daniel wrote:
Hi, I've read on Bugzilla Issue 6398 that this is a bug:
static int value;
ref foo(){ printf(getter\n); return value; }
ref foo(int x){ printf(setter\n); value = x; return value; }
void main(){ foo = 1; } // Should print setter, but print getter in 2.054
Hah, I never thought of using that check. Thanks.
On 07/01/2012 00:31, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I admit I've no idea how the D compiler implements compile-time
evaluation, but is it possible for the compiler to actually emit code
for compile-time functions containing asm blocks and, say, execute it in
a sandbox, and read the values out from the
On 07/01/2012 02:28, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 02:15:39AM +, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 07/01/2012 00:31, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I admit I've no idea how the D compiler implements compile-time
evaluation, but is it possible for the compiler to actually emit code
for compile-time
On 01/07/2012 12:37 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, January 07, 2012 00:03:39 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Most likely those functions are just implemented using inline assembly,
therefore not usable in CTFE.
Yeah, several functions in std.math use inline assembly. So, for them to be
17 matches
Mail list logo
