I am a Java developer who is tired of java.nio and similar
complex socket libraries.
In Java you got QuickServer, the ultimate protocol creation
centered socket library. You don't have to write any channels and
readers and what not. You just instantiate a server, configures
the handlers (fill
On Thu, 17 May 2012 16:28:56 +0200, Christian Köstlin
wrote:
On 5/15/12 19:44 , H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:29:38PM +0200, Christian Köstlin wrote:
for [1, 2, 3] and iota(2, 10)?
[...]
What are you trying to accomplish?
T
actually i just want to do some commandline par
On Wednesday, 1 December 2010 at 08:17:37 UTC, zusta wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm trying to read a JSON-formated file. The parsing of the
file seems to be
correct, but I always get the following error:
"Error: no [] operator overload for type JSONValue".
For testing purposes, I also tried the code o
On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 18:36:22 UTC, Jarl André wrote:
On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 14:08:27 UTC, Vincent wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2012 at 17:50:45 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Hope it's clear...
Nope, it's something like chess and have nothing common with
simplicity of the real JSON usa
On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 14:08:27 UTC, Vincent wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2012 at 17:50:45 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Hope it's clear...
Nope, it's something like chess and have nothing common with
simplicity of the real JSON usage! This is example from C#:
var p = JsonConvert.Deserializ
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 12:58:20 UTC, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 21:03:45 UTC, Paul wrote:
I am reading a file that has a few extended ASCII codes (e.g.
degree symdol). Depending on how I read the file in and what I
do with it the error shows up at different points. I'm
On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:35:17 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Hi,
Suppose that I have an AA that I'm doing lookups on from one thread, and
writing to in another. Is this safe at all?
No.
AA's are not a default-shared type.
If you need a counter-case, just consider that your adding thr
On Wed, 16 May 2012 03:20:39 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 09:15:06 bearophile wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
> It seems that foreach is iterating over an implicit copy of
> 'foo' instead of
> 'foo' itself. Is this correct behavior, or a DMD bug?
This program prints "[1
On 5/15/12 20:14 , Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/15/2012 10:29 AM, Christian Köstlin wrote:
for [1, 2, 3] and iota(2, 10)?
thanks in advance
christian
When it comes to compile-time polymorphism or duck typing, they are both
RandomAccessRanges. (Pedantically, [1, 2, 3] is not a range (I think
:P),
On 5/15/12 19:44 , H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:29:38PM +0200, Christian Köstlin wrote:
for [1, 2, 3] and iota(2, 10)?
[...]
What are you trying to accomplish?
T
actually i just want to do some commandline parsing with default-values
like this:
int main(string[] args) {
On Sunday, 25 March 2012 at 17:50:45 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Hope it's clear...
Nope, it's something like chess and have nothing common with
simplicity of the real JSON usage! This is example from C#:
var p = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject("{some real JSON,
not crapy EOS}");
var str = Js
On 05/17/12 11:36, Artur Skawina wrote:
>assert(cast(size_t)data.ptr%data.alignof==0);
>
> This assert can be easily triggered eg by doing
>
>blob[1..$-4]; blob.assumeSafeAppend(); ++blob.length;
>auto data = cast(C[]) blob;
Umm, that was meant to be:
blob = blob[1..$-4]; bl
On 05/17/12 10:47, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 08:39:21 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> On 05/17/12 10:15, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
>>> I mean, is it safe (assuming that we are allowed to mutate blob, and its
>>> length is a multiple of C.sizeof)?
>>>
>>> I do casting from ubyte[
On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 08:39:21 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 05/17/12 10:15, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
I mean, is it safe (assuming that we are allowed to mutate
blob, and its length is a multiple of C.sizeof)?
I do casting from ubyte[] to C[].
Only if C.ptr ends up properly aligned. There
On 05/17/12 10:15, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 07:07:58 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
>> And what about the following code:
>>
>> // This implementation is optimized for speed via swapping
>> endianness in-place
>> pure immutable(C)[] fixEndian(C, Endian blobEndian =
>> endian)
On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 07:07:58 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
And what about the following code:
// This implementation is optimized for speed via swapping
endianness in-place
pure immutable(C)[] fixEndian(C, Endian blobEndian =
endian)(ubyte[] blob) if(is(CharTypeOf!C))
{
import std.bitm
On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 04:16:10 UTC, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
Do unions suffer from this problem? Could this prevent
alignment
problems:
short bytesToShort(ubyte[] b)
in { assert(b.length==2); }
body {
uni
17 matches
Mail list logo
