On 2012-09-18 04:41, Elias Zamaria wrote:
I reported it, along with the console details, on the bug tracker. You
can see it at http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8682. I
think it is kind of strange that I need to install a 3rd party app just
to be able to install the compiler, especial
On 09/17/2012 04:16 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
With a deimos header file, I expect to need only to pass the dpath to it
and the library it references to dmd, e.g.
stuff
- deimos
- python
- Python.d
dmd -Istuff -L-lpython2.7
I should not need to actually pass stuff/deimos/python/Pytho
I reported it, along with the console details, on the bug
tracker. You can see it at
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8682. I think it is
kind of strange that I need to install a 3rd party app just to be
able to install the compiler, especially considering that no one
else seems t
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 at 18:33:22 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 at 18:20:49 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I'm thinking I this is supposed to be a compiler error and I
should report as a bug:
"It is illegal for a GotoStatement to be used to skip
initializations."
With a deimos header file, I expect to need only to pass the dpath to it
and the library it references to dmd, e.g.
stuff
- deimos
- python
- Python.d
dmd -Istuff -L-lpython2.7
I should not need to actually pass stuff/deimos/python/Python.d to dmd.
Unfortunately, that is currently not
On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> Then .longest with zip seems to be the way to go.
>
> Ah ain't that cool. It looks like it works. What does it use for the
> sentinel, Type.init perhaps?
>
Yep just tried with floats and returns NaN. Thanks again, Ali! :)
On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> Then .longest with zip seems to be the way to go.
Ah ain't that cool. It looks like it works. What does it use for the
sentinel, Type.init perhaps?
On 09/17/2012 03:51 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I think you actually want .shortest, no?
No I want to continue iterating as long as one of the ranges is still
not empty. I'm not doing just comparisons, once there's only one range
that's not empty I have to do som
On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> foreach (aa, bb; lockstep(arr1, arr2))
>> {
>> if (aa == sentinel)
>> {
>> if (aa % 2 == 0)
>
> Gah I've messed up the simple example. If aa was a sentinel then it
> meant I wouldn't che
On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> foreach (aa, bb; lockstep(arr1, arr2))
> {
> if (aa == sentinel)
> {
> if (aa % 2 == 0)
Gah I've messed up the simple example. If aa was a sentinel then it
meant I wouldn't check it at all, I'd try to check 'bb' instead.
On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> I think you actually want .shortest, no?
No I want to continue iterating as long as one of the ranges is still
not empty. I'm not doing just comparisons, once there's only one range
that's not empty I have to do some special checks on its elements. In
simple terms
On 09/17/2012 03:00 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I need to iterate through two arrays and do some special comparisons,
but the arrays are not guaranteed to have the same length. lockstep
doesn't work with the "longest" policy, e.g.:
int[] a = [1, 2];
int[] b = [1, 2, 3];
foreach (aa, bb; lockstep
On 9/17/12, Simon wrote:
> You MUST NOT allow a D exception to
> propagate out of the wndproc (or indeed any other Win32 callback
> function) as the Win32 calling code has no idea how to process it and
> you'll just get a crash.
>
That's just complete and utter bullshit. A try/catch can be set in
I need to iterate through two arrays and do some special comparisons,
but the arrays are not guaranteed to have the same length. lockstep
doesn't work with the "longest" policy, e.g.:
int[] a = [1, 2];
int[] b = [1, 2, 3];
foreach (aa, bb; lockstep(a, b, StoppingPolicy.longest)) // throws
{
}
W
On 16/09/2012 23:32, cal wrote:
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 at 22:08:53 UTC, deed wrote:
Exactly. I couldn't remember seeing this error before.
I've only used the dsource Win32 bindings, because there is often stuff
missing from the phobos ones:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/
On Monday, September 17, 2012 23:11:42 Namespace wrote:
> I thought that "new A()" could be implicit immutable. Thanks for
> reporting.
I'm sure that there are places where the compiler theoretically could
implicitly convert a class or struct instantiated with new to immutable (e.g.
when it's us
On Monday, September 17, 2012 22:59:31 Namespace wrote:
> It seems that nothrow functions/methods which take a AA have some
> problems with .length and opApply, but I'm not sure if I should
> report it as a bug.
>
> Here the code:
> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/a61e721e
> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/3652fcc4
On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 13:42:08 UTC, Namespace wrote:
I can do:
array[new A()] = 42;
array[a1] = 23;
Both lines are valid.
But if I would access the elements later with their keys, I
can't because I have not a valid key for the element 42, only
for 23.
so my suggestion is: allow ref
I thought that "new A()" could be implicit immutable. Thanks for
reporting.
On Monday, September 17, 2012 20:56:21 Namespace wrote:
> As you can see here, you can change the key very easily:
> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/71697a23
It's a bug. It should already be reported somewhere, but I can't find it, so
re-reported it:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8681
The
It seems that nothrow functions/methods which take a AA have some
problems with .length and opApply, but I'm not sure if I should
report it as a bug.
Here the code:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/a61e721e
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/3652fcc4
On Monday, September 17, 2012 20:59:05 Johannes Pfau wrote:
> addRequestHeader is quite dumb. It simply appends the header to a list.
> So by just calling it again you would actually send 2 Content-Type
> headers.
So, you're suggesting to send 2 content headers? That can't be good. It might
work,
Am Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:33:28 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshansky :
> Recently was playing around with std.net.curl high-level API.
>
> One thing that is a blocker for me is (quoting the docs):
>
> @property void postData(const(char)[] data);
> Specifying data to post when not using the onSend callbac
As you can see here, you can change the key very easily:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/71697a23
But even they would be immutable: I have still no guarantee that
my key must be a lvalue. Or am I wrong? Otherwise I'm still for
ref keys.
does it still copy the slice?
On Monday, September 17, 2012 15:42:55 Namespace wrote:
> Until now it is possible to have const keys in assocative arrays,
Keys are supposed to be immutable. If that's not enforced by the compiler,
then it's a bug. Given the current issues with the implementation for AAs' it
wouldn't surprise m
Recently was playing around with std.net.curl high-level API.
One thing that is a blocker for me is (quoting the docs):
@property void postData(const(char)[] data);
Specifying data to post when not using the onSend callback.
...
Content-Type will default to text/plain. Data is not converted or
On Monday, September 17, 2012 19:43:24 Andre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> assuming I have following constuct:
>
> public class Bank{
> public enum test()
> {
> return "writeln(\""~__traits(identfier, this)~"\");";
> }
> }
>
> public static void main(){
> Bank b = new Bank;
> mixin(b.test());
> }
>
> During
On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 18:01:02 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 9/17/12, Andre wrote:
Get identifier of "this"
You can't really get that info at runtime, a class object isn't
bound
to a name, 'this' has no identifier. Symbols (like variables)
have
identifiers, not objects.
...
Hi
On 9/17/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Please file, ICE should never occur.
You're bound to find a small million of these when it comes to typos
in templates. :)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8679
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:01:35 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Your original sample does cause a compiler ICE but I don't know if
it's worth filing since the code was invalid.
Please file, ICE should never occur.
-Steve
On 9/17/12, Andre wrote:
> Get identifier of "this"
You can't really get that info at runtime, a class object isn't bound
to a name, 'this' has no identifier. Symbols (like variables) have
identifiers, not objects.
> public class Bank{
Unnecessary, declarations are public by default.
> pub
Hi,
assuming I have following constuct:
public class Bank{
public enum test()
{
return "writeln(\""~__traits(identfier, this)~"\");";
}
}
public static void main(){
Bank b = new Bank;
mixin(b.test());
}
During compile time, following code should be generated:
writeln("b");
On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 14:54:48 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you think it's useful and possible to extend the D type
inference (deduction) for templates to support something like
this (I know there are different ways to do this in D)?
struct Tree1 {
static struct Node { int x; }
}
s
Do you think it's useful and possible to extend the D type
inference (deduction) for templates to support something like
this (I know there are different ways to do this in D)?
struct Tree1 {
static struct Node { int x; }
}
struct Tree2 {
static struct Node { int x, y; }
}
void foo(T)(
Until now it is possible to have const keys in assocative arrays,
e.g. Tile[const Vector2s], but it isn't possible to have ref
keys, e.g. Tile[ref Vector2s].
If I have this code:
[code]
class A { }
A a1 = new A();
int[A] array;
[/code]
I can do:
array[new A()] = 42;
array[a1] = 23;
Both line
On 2012-09-17 08:49, Elias Zamaria wrote:
"Check the Console"? How do I do that? What console are you referring to?
/Applications/Utilities/Console.app
Also, why is this installer on the official-looking download page if it
doesn't work? Should whoever is in control of the page put this other
37 matches
Mail list logo
