On Wednesday, 14 November 2012 at 02:33:47 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Rob T:
so I hope the suggestion that was made to improve depreciated
with warnings and so forth, is implemented.
"Deprecated features as warnings" is in the D front since about
7 hours:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Langua
On Wednesday, 14 November 2012 at 02:33:47 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Rob T:
so I hope the suggestion that was made to improve depreciated
with warnings and so forth, is implemented.
"Deprecated features as warnings" is in the D front since about
7 hours:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Langua
Rob T:
so I hope the suggestion that was made to improve depreciated
with warnings and so forth, is implemented.
"Deprecated features as warnings" is in the D front since about 7
hours:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/5881617a34adc172b830314c17da21d5c834ffd0
Bye,
bearop
On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 03:29:09 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I agree. Generally I think warnings should be active on default
and disabled on request with a switch :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Agreed! Fortunately I have not written all that much broken code
yet. I recall a lot of discussion about ho
On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 03:08:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, November 12, 2012 03:58:17 Vijay Nayar wrote:
I was under the impression that the attribute "override" was
mandatory when replacing a virtual function in a base class.
However, code that leaves this out has no errors
This is merely a syntactic difference in how structs are handled.
In D, structs are more akin to low level types like int and have
most of the same symantics.
So
SnonParameterized cnp(5, 3.303);
makes about as much sense as
int cnp(3);
You have two syntax choices to pick from in the D ver
In Dr Alexandrescu's "The D Programming Language", on page 12, it
is noted that the D compiler will rewrite tail calls within a
procedure as loops. Does the compiler rewrite tail calls between
procedures as jumps?
For example, in pseudo-D:
void foo(K)(K cont, stuff..) {
// Do things with
This is very well written. Thanks for the link!
- Vijay
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 16:29:41 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 16:18:43 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 04:50:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you know if it's possible to write simila
On 11/12/2012 06:55 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> I'm just curious
> if there is any other way to meaningfully determine the type of one
> function argument based on the type of another. Hence the playing with
> different template argument formulations.
>
> It just feels really difficult t
Ok, I get it.
My understanding is that you have basically two options.
* If you want the function to be called with any implicitly
castable type, then you must cast it in the function.
* If you only want the function to accept the one type,
then use is(T == FooT.T1) and you must cast
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 12:31:26 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
This issue looks like bug8093.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8093
And the code works correctly in git head (dmd2.061alpha).
Therefore, I think that the bug is fixed very recently.
Kenji Hara
Thanks for the resp
On 11/13/2012 05:05 PM, Vijay Nayar wrote:
I believe this question was asked before, but here is the solution again.
The actual reality of what I'm trying to do is slightly more complex: it's more
like
struct Foo(_T1, _T2)
{
alias _T1 T1;
alias _T2 T2;
// etc.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:19:36 -0500
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:56:57 +0100
> Don Clugston wrote:
> >
> > I recommend deskzilla lite. D is on its list of supported
> > open-source projects. It maintains a local copy of the entire
> > bugzilla database, so you're not restricted
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 16:18:43 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 04:50:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you know if it's possible to write similar code nicely &
efficiently with ranges?
Bearophile, do you know of a good reference to learn about
ranges in D? Due to
Apperently this is by design:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8295
To clarify: It is not possible to define a destructor that will be
called on the destruction of a shared struct.
In a different thread Walter commeted this bug with:
"If you include an object designed to work only
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 04:50:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you know if it's possible to write similar code nicely &
efficiently with ranges?
Bearophile, do you know of a good reference to learn about ranges
in D? Due to the language name, Googling for specific topics in
D is a bit di
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:56:57 +0100
Don Clugston wrote:
>
> I recommend deskzilla lite. D is on its list of supported open-source
> projects. It maintains a local copy of the entire bugzilla database,
> so you're not restricted to the slow and horrible html interface.
>
Awesome! I wish GitHub ha
I believe this question was asked before, but here is the
solution again.
struct Foo(_T1, _T2)
{
alias _T1 T1;
alias _T2 T2;
T1 a;
T2 b;
}
FooT.T1 func(FooT, T)(FooT foo, T x)
if (is(FooT.T1) && is(T : FooT.T1))
{
return x * foo.a;
}
void main() {
auto foo = Foo!(size_t, string)(
On 11/13/12, Don Clugston wrote:
> I recommend deskzilla lite. D is on its list of supported open-source
> projects. It maintains a local copy of the entire bugzilla database, so
> you're not restricted to the slow and horrible html interface.
Wow, I had no idea they had this. I've added a note a
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 08:50:16 UTC, Rob T wrote:
Hard to describe this problem, see code and read comments below.
class A
{
private int _v;
this( int a_v )
{
_v = a_v;
}
@property size_t length()
{
return 1;
}
int opApply( int delegate( r
On 13/11/12 06:51, Rob T wrote:
On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 14:28:53 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 11/12/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 11/12/12, Don Clugston wrote:
Yeah. Though note that 1000 bug reports are from bearophile.
Actually only around 300 remain open:
http://d.puremagic.com
Hard to describe this problem, see code and read comments below.
class A
{
private int _v;
this( int a_v )
{
_v = a_v;
}
@property size_t length()
{
return 1;
}
int opApply( int delegate( ref int a_v ) a_dg )
{
int result = 0;
for ( u
22 matches
Mail list logo
