On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:29:50 -, Sam Hu samhudotsa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 10:05:16 UTC, Nathan M. Swan wrote:
I've never used ODBC before, but a quick scan of the MSDN docs suggests
that you should use SQL_C_WCHAR instead, maybe using some D wstring
Sorry maybe I am stupid but where is the value of concrete T?
Or perhaps I completely misunderstood this?
Dňa 5. 12. 2012 4:59 Ali Çehreli wrote / napísal(a):
On 12/04/2012 06:42 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
One thing I've always struggled with in oop is how to deal with
storing generic types.
A
What I know about this topic is in the following chapter:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/object.html
Ali
Thanks, Ali. That clarifies why it worked with opCmp and not with
opEquals.
On 11/30/2012 05:45 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I've forced it pretty hard: :D
immutable(Network) idup() pure const @property
{
Node[uint] nodesCopy;
foreach (key, node; nodes) {
immutable(Node) nodeCopy = node.idup;
nodesCopy[key] =
This is simple code to create all genetic combinations from two
organisms.
string[] mixGenes(string a, string b) {
string[] result;
foreach(i;0..2)
foreach(j;0..2)
foreach(k;2..4)
foreach(m;2..4)
This is simple code to create all genetic combinations from two
organisms.
string[] mixGenes(string a, string b) {
string[] result;
foreach(i;0..2)
foreach(j;0..2)
foreach(k;2..4)
foreach(m;2..4)
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 03:59:29 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/04/2012 06:42 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
One thing I've always struggled with in oop is how to deal
with
storing generic types.
A very simple example is, suppose you had to design a way to
store generic types.
class
12/5/2012 5:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 23:28:25 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12/4/2012 10:40 PM, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 21:43:09 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Well TDPL claims multiple alias this is allowed so in some distant
future it
On 12/05/2012 04:28 AM, Lubos Pintes wrote:
where is the value of concrete T?
Or perhaps I completely misunderstood this?
Maybe I misunderstand you. :) Are you pointing out that the class
template that I have shown did not have any member variables? If so,
they can have anything they want.
On 2012-12-05, 20:03, js.mdnq wrote:
sizeof always returns 4 or 8 regardless of size of class:
class myclass(T)
{
public:
T v1;
T v2;
T v3;
T v4;
T v5;
T v6;
}
writeln((myclass!byte).sizeof, (myclass!double).sizeof);
or even
On 12/05/2012 08:03 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
sizeof always returns 4 or 8 regardless of size of class:
class myclass(T)
{
public:
T v1;
T v2;
T v3;
T v4;
T v5;
T v6;
}
writeln((myclass!byte).sizeof, (myclass!double).sizeof);
or even
On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 22:07:48 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12/5/2012 5:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
There's nothing natural about Variant. It's attempting to add dynamic
typing to a statically typed language.
Bleh that smells religious. There are cases where one may just go for it
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 00:17:05 UTC, deed wrote:
interface I
{
bool opEquals(I i);
}
class C : I
{
bool opEquals(I i)
{
return true;
}
}
void main()
{
I i1 = new C;
I i2 = new C;
assert(i1 == i2); // Assertino failure
assert(i1 != i2); //
12/5/2012 11:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 22:07:48 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12/5/2012 5:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
There's nothing natural about Variant. It's attempting to add dynamic
typing to a statically typed language.
Bleh that smells religious.
On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 17:43:21 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Well TDPL claims multiple alias this is allowed so in some
distant future it maybe possible for Varaint to alias this to
all built-in types.
Maybe
I remember back when I was originally reading about C++ and
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 21:39:31 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
My god did it finally post? Sorry if it repeated a few times...
Left it on easily overnight and it still didn't say it posted any
of it. :(
On Thursday, December 06, 2012 01:06:33 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
To know what on earth you're suposed to do with the variable. If it's a
type that you can't handle, then yes, you'd probably have to throw an
exception, but you generally use a Variant because you need to be able to
return
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 22:53:11 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/05/2012 09:51 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
(if your having trouble understanding the problem then just
think of how
you would efficiently store the nodes and edges of a directed
acyclic
graph. Each node is of a somewhat arbitrary
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 11:33:16 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:29:50 -, Sam Hu
samhudotsa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 at 10:05:16 UTC, Nathan M. Swan
wrote:
I've never used ODBC before, but a quick scan of the MSDN
docs suggests that you
Known issues:
Under console reading Access table recordsets works fine
,inserting a new record which contains only English characters
works fine as well,but inserting new record which contains
Chinese character will crash;
If calling the fetchAll in a DFL gui form and try to display the
On 12/05/2012 04:40 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 22:53:11 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/05/2012 09:51 AM, js.mdnq wrote:
(if your having trouble understanding the problem then just
think of how
you would efficiently store the nodes and edges of a directed
acyclic
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 19:32:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yes, but that inevitably forces you to check the type in order
to handle it correctly, which means that implicit conversion
just doesn't work. In order for implicit conversion to work,
you have to be able to assume that
On 12/05/2012 09:30 AM, ixid wrote:
This is simple code to create all genetic combinations from two organisms.
string[] mixGenes(string a, string b) {
string[] result;
foreach(i;0..2)
foreach(j;0..2)
foreach(k;2..4)
foreach(m;2..4)
result ~= [a[i]] ~ [b[j]] ~ [a[k]] ~ [b[m]];
return result;
}
23 matches
Mail list logo
