Am 13.12.2012 04:32, schrieb js.mdnq:
I think the issue I have with all this is that when you put code
inside a string you lose a lot of compile time features AFAICT.
your right - but...try to come up with an similar ("easy" to implement)
powerfull solution that is not based on strings and you
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:01:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/10/2012 01:52 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
> I want to avoid having to wrap the code with "
> " as it disables highlighting and possibly other
features(intellisense,
> etc...))
The q{} syntax is supposed to help with that issue. Emacs
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 17:34:53 Ali Çehreli wrote:
> (There must be an easier way of doing that. :))
If you have a string that's really ASCII and you're _sure_ that it's only
ASCII, then I'd suggest simply casting it to immutable(ubyte)[] and operating
on that with all range based funct
On 12/12/2012 05:18 PM, Mu wrote:
> Why doesn't the below code compile?
> How to rewrite it so that it does?
> Using: DMD64 D Compiler v2.060.
> Thank you.
>
> Code:
>
>
> import std.algorithm, std.ascii, std.stdio;
>
> void main()
> {
> char[] rot13 = lowercase.dup;
>
> bringToFr
Why doesn't the below code compile?
How to rewrite it so that it does?
Using: DMD64 D Compiler v2.060.
Thank you.
Code:
import std.algorithm, std.ascii, std.stdio;
void main()
{
char[] rot13 = lowercase.dup;
bringToFront(rot13[0 .. 13], rot13[13 .. $]);
write
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 01:09:28 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Take the example here:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/vrupqijwqmccdpabm...@forum.dlang.org
note how he provides the body of the method in the mixin. I
would like to something similar to what he has done but provide
the body of the m
ixid:
It seems very similar to a function overload to me. Why is
picking T[] in preference to T different to picking uint over
ulong for an overloaded function used on a uint?
The name T can refer to any type, including a U[], while built-in
types like uint are atomic, they can't refer to a
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 14:28:48 UTC, Zardoz wrote:
How I can compile with static linking with dmd ?
I try with dmd -L-static
but i get this error :
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
I used before gdc with -static options and owrked well on it,
but I need to use now dmd.
Try usi
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 15:28:46 Zardoz wrote:
> How I can compile with static linking with dmd ?
> I try with dmd -L-static
> but i get this error :
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
>
> I used before gdc with -static options and owrked well on it, but
> I need to use now dmd.
At t
On 12/12/2012 07:37 AM, Cube wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 15:21:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, Cube wrote:
>> > Better example code for my other problem. How can I make the
>> 3rd foo
>> > work on Datas?
>> >
>> > --
>> > struct Data(T)
>> > {
>> > T elem;
>> >
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 14:21:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
ixid:
It's a pity it doesn't see T[] as the best fit and go with it
on that basis.
It's not a pity, it's a good design. "Best fit" makes
language&compiler complex, less predictable for the programmer,
etc.
Bye,
bearophile
Ali Çehreli:
This works:
void foo(T)(T t) if(is(T == Data!T))
Try:
void foo(T)(Data!T t) {
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 15:21:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/12/2012 06:49 AM, Cube wrote:
> Better example code for my other problem. How can I make the
3rd foo
> work on Datas?
>
> --
> struct Data(T)
> {
> T elem;
> }
Data is a struct template, not a type (until instantiated).
>
On 12/12/2012 05:47 AM, Zardoz wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 17:50:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 12/11/2012 08:12 AM, Zardoz wrote:
>>
>>
>> Could you please move MapIntegrator() to module-level. Then it should
>> work.
>>
>> Ali
>
> I try it and now even with normal Map function giv
Better example code for my other problem. How can I make the 3rd
foo work on Datas?
--
struct Data(T)
{
T elem;
}
void main()
{
foo(1);
foo([1,1]);
auto tmp1 = new Data!(int);
tmp1.elem = 3;
foo(tmp1);
auto tmp2 = new Data!(string);
How I can compile with static linking with dmd ?
I try with dmd -L-static
but i get this error :
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
I used before gdc with -static options and owrked well on it, but
I need to use now dmd.
ixid:
It's a pity it doesn't see T[] as the best fit and go with it
on that basis.
It's not a pity, it's a good design. "Best fit" makes
language&compiler complex, less predictable for the programmer,
etc.
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 12:34:34 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Cube:
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do th
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 12:34:34 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Cube:
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do th
On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 17:50:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/11/2012 08:12 AM, Zardoz wrote:
Could you please move MapIntegrator() to module-level. Then it
should work.
Ali
I try it and now even with normal Map function give me errors
with dmd !
public Entity MapIntegrator ( E
Cube:
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do this?
--
void main()
{
foo(1);
foo([1,1]);
}
void foo(T)(
Hi,
I'm having a problem getting templates to work correctly.
I want to handle arrays differently, but when I try to compile
the following example code it says it matches more than 1
template. What is the correct way to do this?
--
void main()
{
foo(1);
foo([1,1]);
}
void foo(T)(T t
22 matches
Mail list logo
