I basically want to be able to do stuff like this:
auto result = map!( (a, b) = a+b )( lockstep(range1, range2) );
Are there any standard short ways to wrap an input range around
struct with opApply (which Lockstep is)?
Also what about redesigning Lockstep as a proper range? I could
do a
On 2012-48-29 14:12, mist n...@none.none wrote:
I basically want to be able to do stuff like this:
auto result = map!( (a, b) = a+b )( lockstep(range1, range2) );
Are there any standard short ways to wrap an input range around struct
with opApply (which Lockstep is)?
Also what about
Any objections to documentation update to cross-reference zip and
lockstep to each other? Was not even searching for first one when
found lockstep, huh.
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 at 14:19:39 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas
wrote:
On 2012-48-29 14:12, mist n...@none.none wrote:
I basically want to
On 12/29/2012 01:45 AM, FG wrote:
I'm trying out the latest GtkD binding. The lib has built without
problems, some example programs also compile, but I can't run them. The
Gtk-Runtime-3.6 archive provided at
https://github.com/gtkd-developers/GtkD/downloads is missing several
win32 DLL
On 12/29/2012 06:19 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
foreach (a; zip(A, B) ) {
// Use a[0] and a[1] here.
}
There have been suggestions to better integrate tuples in the language,
so in the future zip may have all the advantages of lockstep (and vice
versa), but don't cross your fingers.
Tuples
So when it will be fixed I will be able to write:
void foo(auto ref Vector3 v);
and it will pass copies or references depending on the situation?
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 at 18:43:37 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
So when it will be fixed I will be able to write:
void foo(auto ref Vector3 v);
and it will pass copies or references depending on the
situation?
Yes. The compiler generates the function for the specific
situation.
So you
Not clever enough to expand like this though:
map!( (a, b) = a+b )( zip(Range1, Range2) );
Using a = a[0]+a[1] is not that big deal though.
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 at 17:58:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/29/2012 06:19 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
foreach (a; zip(A, B) ) {
// Use a[0]
On Saturday, December 29, 2012 19:43:36 Minas Mina wrote:
So when it will be fixed I will be able to write:
void foo(auto ref Vector3 v);
and it will pass copies or references depending on the situation?
For templated functions, it currently generates either
void foo(ref Vector3 v);
or
Wasn't opDollar was fixed? Slices don't seem to be working... In
one of my tests (can't duplicate here for some reason) using
__dollar when it would see __dollar it complained about needing
'this' access.
struct S {
int[] x;
this(int[] x) {this.x = x;}
int opDollar() {return x.length;}
Oh yes, dmd version 2.60, Windows 32bit version. I pretty sure
it would propagate all versions.
On 2012-52-29 20:12, mist n...@none.none wrote:
Not clever enough to expand like this though:
map!( (a, b) = a+b )( zip(Range1, Range2) );
Using a = a[0]+a[1] is not that big deal though.
That oughta be doable. However, seeing as std.functional only contains
unaryFun and binaryFun (dranges
On Saturday, December 29, 2012 23:15:34 Era Scarecrow wrote:
Oh yes, dmd version 2.60, Windows 32bit version. I pretty sure
it would propagate all versions.
That would be your problem. It's not fixed in 2.060. It was fixed since then.
Use the latest from git or the current beta.
- Jonathan
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 at 23:58:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That would be your problem. It's not fixed in 2.060. It was
fixed since then. Use the latest from git or the current beta.
Hmm alright, I've installed the beta. New problems are creeping
up curiously enough. There seems
On Sunday, 30 December 2012 at 03:43:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
For any bugs that you find in the beta, bring them up in the
beta list and create bug reports for them in bugzilla:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues
Will do
Looking at the code though, I'm shocked to see a function
On Sunday, 30 December 2012 at 03:43:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
For any bugs that you find in the beta, bring them up in the
beta list and create bug reports for them in bugzilla:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues
Couldn't find a previous mention of this case.
16 matches
Mail list logo
