This may have been discussed before, but I'm not sure whether this is a bug
or not. In any case it's a bit confusing.
struct Foo2{
this(T...)(T args){
assert(0);
}
}
void main(){
auto a2=Foo2();//doesn't call assert(0) (ie this(T...) not called)
}
(question is not about function body realisation - body just
don't receives right argument value)
// Simple function called for unsigned integers:
static
ubyte[] packVarint(T)( T value )
if( isIntegral!T && isUnsigned!T )
out( arr )
{
T d;
size_t size = d.unpackVarint( &arr[0] );
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
writeln( "out contract, type=", typeid(T), " isUnsigned=",
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:12:01AM +0200, John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 01:24:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> >As far as I know, static foreach is only for tuples (or TypeTuples)
>
> TypeTuples are tuples. Sortof. We really need to get that whole
> situation sorted
Not
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 01:24:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
As far as I know, static foreach is only for tuples (or
TypeTuples)
TypeTuples are tuples. Sortof. We really need to get that whole
situation sorted
On 09/16/2013 01:24 PM, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
>static string[string] columns () {
// ...
>}
Although the function itself is static, it returns a dynamic value.
> foreach( attr, col; columns() ) {
>__traits(getMember, me, attr) = typeof(__traits(getMember, me,
> attr)).ini
On 14.09.2013 18:46, Buk wrote:
Hi all,
I've read http://dlang.org/dll.html, and frankly there seems to be a lot
of boilerplate & rote process to build a DLL.
I realise that many of the do nothing functions /can/ be used to do a
lot more; and these may be required for some purposes. But, for
On Sep 17, 2013, at 4:14 AM, Temtaime wrote:
> I cannot use the delete/destroy. I want to call dtor at all unreferenced
> objects.
> Manual from Dlang size says that GC.collect triggers a full collection. But
> it doesn't.
It does. But the collector isn't guaranteed to collect everything that
On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 16:05:13 UTC, Buk wrote:
Thanks for the help guys.
Sorry for the silence. It has just happened that your question
touches relatively under-explored area of the language and thus
finding someone with actual experience on topic is hard. I don't
even know if we
On Saturday, 14 September 2013 at 16:46:06 UTC, Buk wrote:
Hi all,
I've read http://dlang.org/dll.html, and frankly there seems to
be a lot of boilerplate & rote process to build a DLL.
I realise that many of the do nothing functions /can/ be used
to do a lot more; and these may be required
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
Well, I guess the best thing would be just to write here, "I
license the code under the terms of the Boost license" or
something similar (public domain is in some ways less good
because not every jurisdiction recognizes it, but as far as I'm
concerned it's fine too).
On 17/09/13 15:18, bearophile wrote:
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
I have a specific interest in your circular queue implementation:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Queue/Usage#Faster_Version
If you restrict your desires to just one D program, instead of
the about one thousand of Rosettacode the situa
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
I have a specific interest in your circular queue
implementation:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Queue/Usage#Faster_Version
If you restrict your desires to just one D program, instead of
the about one thousand of Rosettacode the situation becomes
_much_ simpler :-)
I wr
On 17/09/13 14:03, bearophile wrote:
I am writing code for Rosettacode since years, I have written, rewritten, I have
modified code written by others, and so on. I have also written many entries
before having an account in that site, so there's no proof the author is me. I
have also written many
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
Would you be prepared to license your own examples under Boost?
I don't know what your intentions were for others' use of your
code, but as it stands the FDL license makes them impossible to
re-use.
I am writing code for Rosettacode since years, I have written,
rew
On 17/09/13 13:32, bearophile wrote:
I am just following the common licensing you see in that site:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.2.html
Recently the author of most of the PicoLisp entries has collected them in a
commercial book, this has caused some troubles.
If you want info about Rosetta
On 17/09/13 13:17, Iain Buclaw wrote:
An example of what the situation is using GNU FDL - last time I checked material
under the GNU FDL could not be put into GPL code and GPL code could not be put
into a GNU FDL manual. So watch out! :-)
Indeed. An unfortunate situation, no?
On 09/17/13 00:53, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:59:10PM +0200, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> On 09/16/13 22:38, Namespace wrote:
[1] Obviously, not a practical short term option for the existing
D2 language. That's probably clear from the context, and the
questio
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 20:58:54 UTC, Kadir Erdem Demir
wrote:
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 15:39:14 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 15:15:28 UTC, Kadir Erdem
Demir wrote:
I am using fft function from std.numeric
Complex!double[] resultfft = fft(timeDomainAmp
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
This message is especially for bearophile, but applies to
anyone posting examples on RosettaCode :-)
Can I ask you to clarify your licensing intentions for these
examples? By default all on RosettaCode is GNU Free
Documentation License, which does not really play in
That is actually very weird because you can override protection
attribute with alias for an aggregate:
// b.d
private struct A_
{
}
public alias A = A_;
// a.d
void main() { A a; } // fine!
That inconsistency feels plain wrong. Worth enhancement request
at least.
On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 11:04:13 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
This message is especially for bearophile, but applies to
anyone posting examples on RosettaCode :-)
Can I ask you to clarify your licensing intentions for these
examples? By default all on RosettaCode is GNU Free
I cannot use the delete/destroy. I want to call dtor at all
unreferenced objects.
Manual from Dlang size says that GC.collect triggers a full
collection. But it doesn't.
This message is especially for bearophile, but applies to anyone posting
examples on RosettaCode :-)
Can I ask you to clarify your licensing intentions for these examples? By
default all on RosettaCode is GNU Free Documentation License, which does not
really play in a friendly way with ... ju
On 17/09/13 11:30, monarch_dodra wrote:
Thanks. I'm not very fluent with opDispatch though. Doesn't that only work if
you have an struct/class instance though? My "fun" is a free frunction.
Ack. Sorry, I overlooked that. :-(
Still, I think this provides greater impulse for Issue 10996 to be f
On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 08:47:25 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 16/09/13 23:00, monarch_dodra wrote:
Question 1: Is this the correct behavior? I'd have expected
that if my alias is
public, it would allow any one from outside to make the call
correctly.
See: http://d.puremagic
On 16/09/13 23:00, monarch_dodra wrote:
Question 1: Is this the correct behavior? I'd have expected that if my alias is
public, it would allow any one from outside to make the call correctly.
See: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10996
Question 2: Is there a "correct" way to do t
ahhh, many thanks!
I need more sleep
On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 07:58:40 UTC, mrd wrote:
[code]
Unsigned!T encodeZigZag( T )( inout T v ) pure
if( isSigned!( T ) )
{
return v > 0
?
v * 2
:
-v * 2 - 1;
}
unittest
{
assert( encodeZigZag!long( 2147483647 ) == 4294967294 );
[code]
Unsigned!T encodeZigZag( T )( inout T v ) pure
if( isSigned!( T ) )
{
return v > 0
?
v * 2
:
-v * 2 - 1;
}
unittest
{
assert( encodeZigZag!long( 2147483647 ) == 4294967294 );
assert( encodeZigZag!long( -2147483648 ) == 4294967295 );
30 matches
Mail list logo
