As far as I understand you just want something working right
now? Then my suggestion would be to look into std.parallelism
[0]. Create a task for each node without a parent. Let the
tasks create new tasks for their children.
Yeah, I'm just trying to get something working right now, so I
will
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:13:38 UTC, DDD wrote:
I'm learning D. I'm curious about surprises I may get. I
typically use C++, C# and javascript
D doesn't have the library count other popular languages have.
And there is a graveyard of projects/libraries which is more
noticeable than more p
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 16:31:13 UTC, tbttfox wrote:
My not currently not working implementation has the workers
make a pull request from the master.
As far as I understand you just want something working right now?
Then my suggestion would be to look into std.parallelism [0].
Create a
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 17:09:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I thought classes do have default ctors?
yeah but you still have to new them.
Class c; // c is null, unlike C++
Class c =new Class(); // cool
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 08:56:45AM +0200, monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:13:38 UTC, DDD wrote:
> >I'm learning D. I'm curious about surprises I may get. I typically
> >use C++, C# and javascript
>
> Off the top of my head, I think the biggest one is that D doesn't
> offer
(late I know but it may help someone)
The linker is trying to link against x86 libraries instead of x64.
If you followed the tutorial to the letter, you need to check if
"%DEV_DIR_WINSDK%\Lib\x64" resolves correctly (paste in cmd or
windows explorer).
Am 18.10.2013 18:40, schrieb Erik van Velzen:
Hello,
I have set up my enviroment according to these instructions:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Installing_DMD_on_64-bit_Windows_7_%28COFF-compatible%29
When I compile a small tutorial program I get this error:
error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol Me
Hello,
I have set up my enviroment according to these instructions:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Installing_DMD_on_64-bit_Windows_7_%28COFF-compatible%29
When I compile a small tutorial program I get this error:
error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol MessageBoxW referenced
in function WinMain
I ha
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 11:40:24 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 07:20:07 UTC, tbttfox wrote:
So I've got a project in mind, and at the core of that project
is a DAG with lots of nodes. This seems to be a great
candidate for concurrent evaluation. The problem is that a
nod
On Sunday, 29 September 2013 at 07:13:26 UTC, Stefan Larsson
wrote:
Hello,
I have started my journey to learn D after using C/C++ and
Python for many years. I am studying the book "The
D-Programming Language" by Andrei Alexandrescu and I have tried
to search the D-newsgroups for proper advice
On 10/18/13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> If you want to call a member function from an invariant, it
> should be static, or it should be a free function.
I can also be private, the diagnostic is pretty clear about that. :)
Why not stick with scipy+numpy in python? Writing numerical code
is painfully time consuming. It's also unlikely that your code
will be more performant than those libraries', it takes a lot of
expertise.
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 20:31:38 UTC, Yura wrote:
Dear D programmers,
I am very
Daniel Davidson:
Please follow through with finding a D solution. But if you
have not seen it yet, have a look at http://julialang.org/ as
well. It may also fit your needs with more focus on
mathematical programming.
Julia is a very new language, quite newer than D. I don't think
it's a good
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 20:31:38 UTC, Yura wrote:
Dear D programmers,
I am very new to D programming language. I just started to
learn it as an alternative to python since the latter sometimes
is too slow. My question is whether there some simple ways to
solve linear algebra problems
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 07:20:07 UTC, tbttfox wrote:
So I've got a project in mind, and at the core of that project
is a DAG with lots of nodes. This seems to be a great candidate
for concurrent evaluation. The problem is that a node can only
be evaluated after all of its parents have.
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 09:08:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 11:04:25 bearophile wrote:
simendsjo:
> See topic. Why is this not allowed? The function in question
> is
> not virtual.
>
> struct S {
>
> void someFunction() const {}
> const invariant(
On Friday, October 18, 2013 11:04:25 bearophile wrote:
> simendsjo:
> > See topic. Why is this not allowed? The function in question is
> > not virtual.
> >
> > struct S {
> >
> > void someFunction() const {}
> > const invariant() { someFunction(); }
> >
> > }
> > void main() {
> >
> >
simendsjo:
See topic. Why is this not allowed? The function in question is
not virtual.
struct S {
void someFunction() const {}
const invariant() { someFunction(); }
}
void main() {
S s;
}
It being not virtual is not important. In what cases is
invariant() called, simendsjo? I s
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:56:49 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:13:38 UTC, DDD wrote:
I'm learning D. I'm curious about surprises I may get. I
typically use C++, C# and javascript
Off the top of my head, I think the biggest one is that D
doesn't offer "defaul
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:13:38 UTC, DDD wrote:
I'm learning D. I'm curious about surprises I may get. I
typically use C++, C# and javascript
Some stuff from the top of my head. Remember that you're asking
for gotchas and
surprises rather than the nice features of D :)
* D has built-i
So I've got a project in mind, and at the core of that project is
a DAG with lots of nodes. This seems to be a great candidate for
concurrent evaluation. The problem is that a node can only be
evaluated after all of its parents have.
I'm really new to D and static typing in general (coming fro
On Friday, October 18, 2013 09:02:49 simendsjo wrote:
> On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:56:49 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> (...)
>
> > struct S
> > {
> >
> > this(int i = 5)
> > {}
> >
> > }
> > S s = S(); //Does *not* call the constructor with the value 5.
>
> I didn't know that. In th
See topic. Why is this not allowed? The function in question is
not virtual.
struct S {
void someFunction() const {}
const invariant() { someFunction(); }
}
void main() {
S s;
}
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:56:49 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
(...)
struct S
{
this(int i = 5)
{}
}
S s = S(); //Does *not* call the constructor with the value 5.
I didn't know that. In that case, I think struct ctors with only
optional parameters should be illegal - how is it possi
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:13:38 UTC, DDD wrote:
I'm learning D. I'm curious about surprises I may get. I
typically use C++, C# and javascript
Off the top of my head, I think the biggest one is that D doesn't
offer "default constructors". Instead, it only has a default
value initializat
25 matches
Mail list logo
