Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at all?
I thought -main switch was intended for this, but apparently it
works only if there's no main defined at all, otherwise, it
issues a double main definition
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 07:59:33 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at
all?
Here's the first thing that came to mind:
If you never want to both unit tests and regular
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 08:22:04 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 07:59:33 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
Hi!
Suppose I have a small .d script that has a main. Is there any
simple way to just run the unit tests without running main at
all?
Here's the first thing that came to
On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 04:02 +, Joel wrote:
I get an access problem (Downloads Tools. link), it saying it's
an unidentified developer.
Thanks for any help.
Apple are trying to impose a rule that all executables on OSX are
signed. I am more or less convinced this is a good idea. It at
On 3/16/14, Sergei Nosov sergei.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx! That's better, but I think -main switch could be made to
work like 'add or replace main by stub' instead of just 'add'. I
don't think it'll hurt anybody, what do you think?
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 02:12:37 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
Back at 2.062 I was able to force the whole of D's
runtime/phobos into an executable which was exactly what I
wanted for a specific project containing not just D but around
50,000 lines of C. (This is to do with having dynamic
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
Hmm I really should consider making a DIP for a deferred CTFE
block. Could really come in handy for a situation like
On Saturday, 15 March 2014 at 22:48:52 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 15 March 2014 at 19:11:38 UTC, Bauss wrote:
Note I am not typing the arguments, but rather starting the
process.
Skip to the bottom of this message if you are doing it in D and
don't care how it is done in the
DMD started to support shared lib on linux from 2.063.
This may be useful: http://dlang.org/dll-linux.html
Also note that if you are only writting the shared lib and not
the client, it would be easyier to bootstrap it using gcc's
attributes (see
On page 249 of TDPL (Andrei's book), in a section on structs and
postblits, it says D objects must be relocatable and other
similar statements while banning internal pointers.
I knew this applies to structs and the context makes that plainly
clear, but the word object is a bit ambiguous: does
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 13:57:42 UTC, Bauss wrote:
Actually I was doing it through C#. I have tried getting the
output of the window but it doesn't seem to redirect it.
Did you try the startup info there too? Here's a link with a .net
example:
When using both simpleimage and DWT my program crashes with
core.exception.InvalidMemoryOperationError after I show an
image in a GUI window and then close the window. I'm presumably
misunderstanding something about how the windows deal with memory
deallocation, but this happens even when
Ah, I need to dispose of the image before disposing of the
display.
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 19:33:09 UTC, PhilE wrote:
When using both simpleimage and DWT my program crashes with
core.exception.InvalidMemoryOperationError after I show an
image in a GUI window and then close the window.
On 3/16/14, PhilE theotherp...@hotmail.com wrote:
When using both simpleimage and DWT my program crashes with
core.exception.InvalidMemoryOperationError
It's likely something is trying to allocate in a destructor.
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 12:57:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
Hmm I really should consider making a DIP for a
DMD started to support shared lib on linux from 2.063.
This may be useful: http://dlang.org/dll-linux.html
Also note that if you are only writting the shared lib and not
the client, it would be easyier to bootstrap it using gcc's
attributes (see
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 04:02:13 UTC, Joel wrote:
I get an access problem (Downloads Tools. link), it saying
it's an unidentified developer.
Thanks for any help.
If you are using Homebrew you can simply do brew install dmd.
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 18:41:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On page 249 of TDPL (Andrei's book), in a section on structs
and postblits, it says D objects must be relocatable and
other similar statements while banning internal pointers.
I knew this applies to structs and the context makes
Thanks Russel!
I've gotten past the security problem!
There's options under Security Privacy (and what can be
downloaded):
O-MacApp Store
O-idetinified developers
@-Anywhere.
Though this (Anywhere) lowers the security of what to download.
I've been Recommended this OS. I can use Windows 7
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 20:22:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 12:57:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 10:15:00 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
It can't work, because main could be stored in a pre-built
object or
static library that's passed to DMD.
20 matches
Mail list logo
