I'm just gonna leave this here:
https://github.com/Circular-Studios/Dash
I should note that Dash is extremely not 1.0, but we're
definitely close. Expect some API changes, though.
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 20:38:59 UTC, David wrote:
Hi, not too sure if there's still someone reading this post,
but i do have another question. So, I heared so much good stuff
about D, it's powerfull, fast the syntax is nice, but well, why
is D actually not used for common games yet? (I m
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 12:42:00 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
What is the preferred format people here use for program config
files? Json, Xml, ini, etc?
JSON is nice for data exchange, but I dislike it for
configuration. It doesn't even support comments, or disabling
sections of the fil
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 09:31:20 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 12:42:00 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
What is the preferred format people here use for program
config files? Json, Xml, ini, etc?
JSON is nice for data exchange, but I dislike it for
configuration. It do
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 20:21:37 UTC, seany wrote:
In my previous post
(http://forum.dlang.org/thread/jcaomfduqeofobcul...@forum.dlang.org)
I asked for an array of pointers to different types, as a stack
for my own, where I can generate and insert runtime variables.
However, seems like
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 10:54:10 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 09:31:20 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 12:42:00 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
What is the preferred format people here use for program
config files? Json, Xml, ini, etc?
JSON is
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 20:58:34 UTC, Foo wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 20:38:59 UTC, David wrote:
Hi, not too sure if there's still someone reading this post,
but i do have another question. So, I heared so much good
stuff about D, it's powerfull, fast the syntax is nice, but
wel
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 11:38:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 10:54:10 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 09:31:20 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 12:42:00 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
What is the preferred format people here
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 05:17:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 8/3/2014 5:38 AM, David wrote:
about platform support,
I know the story. But throwing all the weight behind a
more-standard back-end would improve things. Yes, it would
require some transition effort. But, then, ldc and gdc wo
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 12:37:51 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 20:58:34 UTC, Foo wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 20:38:59 UTC, David wrote:
on this road. It matters less for us to be able to use slices
And this while D really nailed down two things very well: strin
I want to try to implement web template engine dustjs:
http://akdubya.github.io/dustjs/
At the first step implementing parser for it's grammar is needed.
As far as code for parsing grammar was generated via PEGjs
grammar generator the resulting code is enough long (about 4200
lines of code). I
This doesn't work:
bool less_than (T)(auto ref T a, auto ref T b)
{
return a < b;
}
Error: auto can only be used for template function parameters
What am I doing wrong? Is this not a template function?
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:07:32 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
This doesn't work:
bool less_than (T)(auto ref T a, auto ref T b)
{
return a < b;
}
Error: auto can only be used for template function parameters
What am I doing wrong? Is this not a template function?
I think you can ju
This would make the function always take its argument by
reference. I'm trying to use the feature here:
http://dlang.org/template.html
from the section Function Templates with Auto Ref Parameters
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:07:32 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
bool less_than (T)(auto ref T a, auto ref T b)
{
return a < b;
}
Error: auto can only be used for template function parameters
Works for me with dmd versions back to 2.060. What compiler are
you using?
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:26:28 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Works for me with dmd versions back to 2.060. What compiler are
you using?
dmd 2.065
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:30:38 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:26:28 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Works for me with dmd versions back to 2.060. What compiler are
you using?
dmd 2.065
Here's how I'm testing this:
$ dmd | head -n 1
DMD64 D Compiler v2.065
$ cat less_t
I'm trying to grok message passing. That's my very first foray
into this, so I'm probably making every mistake in the book :-)
I wrote a small threadpool test, it's there:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/3d3a65a00425
I'm playing with the number of threads and the number of tasks,
and getting a feel about
I'm trying to grok message passing. That's my very first foray
into this, so I'm probably making every mistake in the book :-)
I wrote a small threadpool test, it's there:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/3d3a65a00425
I'm playing with the number of threads and the number of tasks,
and getting a feel abo
Uranuz:
> http://akdubya.github.io/dustjs/
> So I need some help with rewriting grammar from PEGjs into PEGGED.
Is this the grammar?
https://github.com/akdubya/dustjs/blob/master/src/dust.pegjs
If so, then I think I can provide some help. But I don't get what
output you want (see below).
> Als
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:25:32 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
This would make the function always take its argument by
reference. I'm trying to use the feature here:
http://dlang.org/template.html
from the section Function Templates with Auto Ref Parameters
I thought I finally saw a questi
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:43:53 UTC, anonymous wrote:
If this exact code errors for you, it ... uhh ... could be
platform specific? Are you on Windows?
Debian, and your code works for me. I figured out the problem - I
made less_than to serve as a default sorting predicate, so in a
few pl
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 20:10:39 UTC, Martijn Pot wrote:
What is the benefit of 'auto ref' over 'in' as you are changing
a nor b?
Because
less_than (T)(T a, T b)
(or in, or const T) will copy a and b on their way into the
function. Usually this is ok but certain data structures I use
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 21:24:03 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
certain data structures I use are not intended to be copied,
.
although these cases are probably better off being compared by
some kind of key rather than directly... so, auto ref isn't
necessary here, it was just something I
On 08/03/14 23:19, Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>
> I made less_than to serve as a default sorting predicate, so in a few places
> there is something like this:
>
> void sort (R, T = ElementType!R, alias compare = less_than!T)(R range, T item)
> {...}
void sort (R, T = Element
So I just started learning D this weekend, and I'm trying to
understand why the following example will not work... Essentially
what I am trying to do is cast the templated child stored in the
parent container as the correct form, return some T value, and
use auto to return the correct value typ
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 22:01:23 UTC, matt wrote:
auto value(Parent item, int type)
{
if(item.type == 1)
{
return Fun!double(cast(Child!double)item);
Here you're returning a double.
}
else if(item.type==2)
return Fun!string(c
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:52:42 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Can someone confirm the results and tell me what I'm doing
wrong?
LDC is likely optimizing the summation:
int sum = 0;
foreach(i; 0..task.goal)
sum += i;
To something like:
int sum = cast(int)(cast(ulong)(
I am currently working on a phobos fork to include associative
ranges, however the unittest fail when i try to build. How am a
supposed test any unittests that i add.
link:https://github.com/Superstar64/phobos/tree/associative_ranges
$ ../dmd/src/dmd |head -1
DMD32 D Compiler v2.066-devel-9d6cef9
When I use the spawnProcess function in std.process, the command
line arguments that I provide to the function seem to get
"quoted". Is there a way to tell the spawnProcess function that I
want the command line arguments to be non-quoted?
Example:
spawnProcess(["SomePath\\Test.exe"], ["-silent
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 22:24:22 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 19:52:42 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Can someone confirm the results and tell me what I'm doing
wrong?
LDC is likely optimizing the summation:
int sum = 0;
foreach(i; 0..task.goal)
sum +=
> This is correct – the LLVM optimizer indeed gets rid of the loop completely.
OK,that's clever. But I get this even when put a writeln("some msg")
inside the task. I thought a write couldn't be optimized away that way
and that it's a slow operation?
Anyway, I discovered Thread.wait() in core in
I am real noob about grammar description languages so I need some
explanation about it. As far as I understand expressions in curly
bracers are used to modify syntax tree just in process of parsing
instead of modifying it after?
How I could use PEGGED to map some code to these parsed
expressi
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Uranuz via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I am real noob about grammar description languages so I need some
> explanation about it. As far as I understand expressions in curly bracers
> are used to modify syntax tree just in process of parsing instead of
> modifying i
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 21:47:06 UTC, Artur Skawina via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
void sort (R, T = ElementType!R, alias compare = less_than)(R
range, T item)
[should work iff the sort implementation only calls the
predicate]
artur
This works! Thanks!
On Monday, 4 August 2014 at 05:14:22 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I have another question: it seems I can spawn hundreds of
threads
(Heck, even 10_000 is accepted), even when I have 4-8 cores. Is
there:
is there a limit to the number of threads? I tried a threadpool
bec
36 matches
Mail list logo
