Hi,
I have a few classes with need for deeper copying. I don't want a
bitwise copy necessarily. Ideally, I'd implement this(this).
I've thought about changing them to struct. However, the type
feels much more like a D class than a D struct. It's often passed
by reference, and it's not plain
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 20:55:51 -0400, Márcio Martins
wrote:
I know... I too hate that one can't use simple logic ops...
Indeed...
Thanks.
Bit
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 00:42:00 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Is there a way to compile for multiple conditions?
version(One) version = OneOrTwo;
else version(Two) version = OneOrTwo;
version(OneOrTwo) {
writeln("moo");
}
---
version(One) version(Two) version = OneAndTwo;
version(OneAndTwo)
On 6/13/2015 9:41 AM, bitwise wrote:
Is there a way to compile for multiple conditions?
Tried all these:
version(One | Two){ }
version(One || Two){ }
version(One && Two){ }
version(One) | version(Two){ }
version(One) || version(Two){ }
version(One) && version(Two){ }
Bit
// config.d
vers
Is there a way to compile for multiple conditions?
Tried all these:
version(One | Two){ }
version(One || Two){ }
version(One && Two){ }
version(One) | version(Two){ }
version(One) || version(Two){ }
version(One) && version(Two){ }
Bit
On 06/12/2015 03:46 PM, kerdemdemir wrote:
>> void foo(R)(R range)
>> if (isInstanceOf!(Tuple, ElementType!R))// <-- optional
>> {
> I am also happy to learn optional static if .
Actually, it is not 'static if' but a template constraint. It is
optional because everything will work with
Thanks a lot for your great advices and exaamples. Yes if I don't
return; web-site won't show it as "wrong answer".
As a learner I am very happy with the responsiveness of the
community.
Regards
void foo(R)(R range)
if (isInstanceOf!(Tuple, ElementType!R))// <-- optional
{
Ali thanks a lot. I don't believe I didn't simply try your way.
It works.
I am also happy to learn optional static if . Your examples are
really useful for me.
Next time I will share whole code.
Thanks
On 06/12/2015 03:19 PM, kerdemdemir wrote:
Hi;
I have tuples created by std.algorithm.group function.
auto tupleB = stringB.group();
I need to write a a function which takes tubleB and do some cool stuff.
If I don't use a function and write all code below .group() everytihng
works but
Hi;
I have tuples created by std.algorithm.group function.
auto tupleB = stringB.group();
I need to write a a function which takes tubleB and do some cool
stuff. If I don't use a function and write all code below
.group() everytihng works but for reusing the code I want to call
a f
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 15:36:22 UTC, anonymous wrote:
no need for ~this() to modify immutable data:
I think that's a another bug related to init values.
no need for ~this() to modify immutable data:
class C {
int a;
this(int a) {
this.a = a;
}
}
struct S {
C elem = new C(42);
}
void main() {
import std.stdio;
immutable(S) s1;
// Error: cannot modify immutable expression s1.e
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 14:55:15 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 14:39:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
I wish it were an error in the Python code so I could fix it,
but it works on all other machines (at least those with
Intel). It's only on the HP625 with AMD that this error
o
I cannot find a way to actually modify immutable memory with
it...
a.d:
class C {
int a;
this(int a) {
this.a = a;
}
}
struct S {
int x;
C elem = new C(42);
~this() {
import std.stdio;
writeln("mutable ~this()");
x = 1;
elem.a = 123;
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 14:39:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
I wish it were an error in the Python code so I could fix it,
but it works on all other machines (at least those with Intel).
It's only on the HP625 with AMD that this error occurs. Another
DLL (which isn't mine) also failed to load, altho
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 14:20:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 13:16:32 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 12:41:23 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 10:54:46 UTC, Chris wrote:
Has anyone run into problems with D on AMD processors? I'm
talking
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 13:16:32 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 12:41:23 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 10:54:46 UTC, Chris wrote:
Has anyone run into problems with D on AMD processors? I'm
talking about Windows 7 on a HP625 laptop in particular.
Can you be
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 12:41:23 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 10:54:46 UTC, Chris wrote:
Has anyone run into problems with D on AMD processors? I'm
talking about Windows 7 on a HP625 laptop in particular.
Can you be any more specific? What kind of problems?
A DLL in D
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 10:54:46 UTC, Chris wrote:
Has anyone run into problems with D on AMD processors? I'm
talking about Windows 7 on a HP625 laptop in particular.
Can you be any more specific? What kind of problems?
On 12/06/2015 10:54 p.m., Chris wrote:
Has anyone run into problems with D on AMD processors? I'm talking about
Windows 7 on a HP625 laptop in particular.
Have you checked the issue tracker?
struct S {
int x;
~this() {
import std.stdio;
writeln("mutable ~this()");
x = 1;
}
}
void main() {
const(S) s1;
immutable(S) s2;
}
Prints:
mutable ~this()
mutable ~this()
This looks very wrong,
Has anyone run into problems with D on AMD processors? I'm
talking about Windows 7 on a HP625 laptop in particular.
On 2015-06-10 20:55, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I'm still tempted to grab a used Mac so I can port my display stuff to
Cocoa and test it, but Macs are outrageously expensive and I hate them,
so want to spend as little as possible.
What does dmd minimally require on a mac? If I got like a 10.5 would
th
On 2015-06-10 20:55, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
i'm considering something like
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MB138LL-Intel-Drive-Combo/dp/B0006HU49Y/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1433962021&sr=8-5&keywords=used+mac+mini
You can look up the requirements for OS X and see which is the latest
version you can ru
24 matches
Mail list logo
