On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:08:40 UTC, Suliman wrote:
I can't understand how to get works delegates works from this
doc http://vibed.org/api/vibe.http.client/requestHTTP
I see example, but when I am looking on Prototypes I really
can't figure how to use them.
For example what does this
I've been playing around with d with a KL25Z eval board. However
it is not easy, It's not easy to know what features are and are
not usable. when will i get a linker error to some
__eabi_something_not_in_the_runtime.
So, question is, does there exist a minimal runtime that will
work with LDC/
On 03/18/2016 09:14 AM, Dsby wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 11:09:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:50:34 UTC, Dsby wrote:
foreach (i ; 0..4) {
auto th = new Thread(delegate(){listRun(i);});//this is erro
_thread[i]= th;
th.start();
}
void listRun(int i
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:50:34 UTC, Dsby wrote:
foreach (i ; 0..4) {
auto th = new Thread(delegate(){listRun(i);});//this is erro
_thread[i]= th;
th.start();
}
void listRun(int i)
{
writeln("i = ", i); // the value is not(0,1,2,3), it all
is 2.
}
I want to
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 12:17:42 UTC, Orkhan wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 18:26:48 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I don't know where from shpuld I get help. Thanks.
Is the xcomm library available somewhere, maybe if we had a link
to the original documentation we could help.
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 20:24:15 UTC, szymski wrote:
class A {
B b = new B();
}
This is *default* initialization, not per instance
initialization. The compiler will create one instance of B and it
will become the default initializer of b in *every* instance of
A. You can ver
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 21:05:43 UTC, JR wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:43:09 UTC, jkpl wrote:
I try to anticipate the reason why you want this. [...]
I use something *kinda* sort of similar in my toy project to
print all fields of a struct, for debugging purposes when stuff
Read the ABI page again, its fairly sufficient about this stuff.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hi !
I wonder if i can rely on this code :
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/745cc5b1cdfb
There's two questions:
1) Is dtors always called in reverse order ?
2) Is all the dtors always called when i call destroy ?
Thanks for a reply !
So this is mostly curiosity and not completely related to D but I
would like to know how a vtable is actually implemented. All the
explanations that I have seen so far are a bit vague and it would
be nice to actually see some code.
I tried to implement the following myself
interface Something
On 3/16/16 2:40 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
should it be a compiler warning to assign a negative literal to an
unsigned without a cast ?
Why? They implicitly convert.
int x = -1;
uint y = x;
I don't see a difference between this and your code. And we can't change
this behavior of the second li
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 18:26:48 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/15/2016 02:45 AM, Orkhan wrote:
> output of the gdc is :
>
> root@ubuntu:/home/alikoza/Downloads/i686-pc-linux-gnu# gdc
> gdc: fatal error: no input files
> compilation terminated.
That makes sense. It should produce an executa
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 14:53:20 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/18/16 7:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:20:40 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi !
I wonder if i can rely on this code :
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/745cc5b1cdfb
There's two questions:
1) Is dtors always ca
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 21:49:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
No, please don't. Assigning a signed value to an unsigned (and
vice versa) is very useful, and there is no good reason to
break this.
-Steve
I'm not talking about removing it completely. The implicit
conversion should
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 17:40:27 UTC, Lass Safin wrote:
Why:
enum Base {
A,
B,
}
enum Derived : Base {
C, // Gives error, says it can't implicitly convert
expression to Base.
D = 1, // Same error
E = cast(Base)294, // Finally works. Can only be
cast(Derived) instead
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 11:27:01 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 10:11:43 UTC, Jeff Thompson wrote:
This is a simplified example from a larger class I have where
I need an immutable constructor. This is because I need to
construct an object an pass it to other fu
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:20:40 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi !
I wonder if i can rely on this code :
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/745cc5b1cdfb
There's two questions:
1) Is dtors always called in reverse order ?
yes
2) Is all the dtors always called when i call destroy ?
yes. destroy calls __dtor() w
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 19:53:01 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Thanks! I am understand a little bit better, but not all.
```
shared static this()
{
auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
settings.port = 8080;
listenHTTP(settings, &handleRequest);
}
void handleRequest(HTTPS
On 19.03.2016 21:24, szymski wrote:
In my opinion &a.b.variable should give different addresses for each
instance of A, because it's not static. What am I doing wrong? Thanks in
advance.
The As are different, but they all reference the same B. Initialize b in
a constructor instead.
Hello!
I'm having a big problem with class members. I'm kinda new to D,
so this may be my fault, but look at the following code:
import std.stdio;
class B {
int variable;
}
class A {
B b = new B();
}
void main()
{
// Create 10 instances of A
foreach(i; 0 ..
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 17:40:27 UTC, Lass Safin wrote:
Why:
enum Base {
A,
B,
}
enum Derived : Base {
C, // Gives error, says it can't implicitly convert
expression to Base.
D = 1, // Same error
E = cast(Base)294, // Finally works. Can only be
cast(Derived) instead
On 3/16/16 4:55 PM, Mathias Lang wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:11:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/16/16 2:40 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
should it be a compiler warning to assign a negative literal to an
unsigned without a cast ?
Why? They implicitly convert.
int x = -1;
ui
On 3/16/16 9:48 PM, tsbockman wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 11:22:02 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Change those static if's to just plain old ifs.
This only works (sometimes) because D's value range propagation doesn't
understand comparisons or normal if statements very well. This will
Thanks! I am understand a little bit better, but not all.
```
shared static this()
{
auto settings = new HTTPServerSettings;
settings.port = 8080;
listenHTTP(settings, &handleRequest);
}
void handleRequest(HTTPServerRequest req,
HTTPServerResponse res)
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 18:24:38 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:55:13 UTC, Lucien wrote:
const int MAX = 64;
Socket[] sockets = new Socket[MAX];
string ipb = "192.168.0.";
for (int i = 1; i < MAX; i++) {
Here's the reason for your SEGV: You need
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 17:12:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Yes. I agree. The way I look at it is that the code *is*
reached in some cases, so it should compile (and just remove
that section in that instance).
IMO any time a template value is used for branching, it should
turn tha
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 17:09:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Converting unsigned to signed or vice versa (of the same size
type) is safe. No information is lost.
Saying that "no information is lost" in such a case, is like
saying that if I encrypt my hard drive and then throw away t
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 22:37:40 Mathias Lang via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 21:49:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
>
> wrote:
> > No, please don't. Assigning a signed value to an unsigned (and
> > vice versa) is very useful, and there is no good reason to
> > bre
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 18:36:10 UTC, ric maicle wrote:
I got an error message with the following code saying:
Error: no property 'length' for type 'int[string]'
Shouldn't the error message say 'length()'?
~~~
import std.stdio;
void main() {
int[string] a;
a["one"] = 1;
a["two"]
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 17:41:29 UTC, Lass Safin wrote:
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 17:40:27 UTC, Lass Safin wrote:
Why:
enum Base {
A,
B,
}
enum Derived : Base {
C, // Gives error, says it can't implicitly convert
expression to Base.
D = 1, // Same error
E = cast
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 15:03:14 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/18/16 10:58 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 14:53:20 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/18/16 7:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:20:40 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi !
I wo
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:11:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/16/16 2:40 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
should it be a compiler warning to assign a negative literal
to an
unsigned without a cast ?
Why? They implicitly convert.
int x = -1;
uint y = x;
I don't see a difference betw
On 3/18/16 7:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:20:40 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi !
I wonder if i can rely on this code :
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/745cc5b1cdfb
There's two questions:
1) Is dtors always called in reverse order ?
yes
2) Is all the dtors always called when i
I got an error message with the following code saying:
Error: no property 'length' for type 'int[string]'
Shouldn't the error message say 'length()'?
~~~
import std.stdio;
void main() {
int[string] a;
a["one"] = 1;
a["two"] = 2;
a["three"] = 3;
auto len = a.length();
}
~~~
DMD 2.0
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:55:13 UTC, Lucien wrote:
const int MAX = 64;
Socket[] sockets = new Socket[MAX];
string ipb = "192.168.0.";
for (int i = 1; i < MAX; i++) {
Here's the reason for your SEGV: You need to start at 0, because
otherwise `sockets[0]` is `null`. When
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 11:52:13 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:53:42 UTC, JR wrote:
void printVars(Args...)()
if (Args.length > 0)
{
import std.stdio : writefln;
foreach (i, arg; Args) {
writefln("%s\t%s:\t%s", typeof(Args[i]).stringof,
On 3/16/16 4:24 PM, data pulverizer wrote:
Hi D gurus,
is there a way to obtain parameter names within the function body? I am
particularly interested in variadic functions. Something like:
void myfun(T...)(T x){
foreach(i, arg; x)
writeln(i, " : ", arg);
}
void main(){
myfu
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 11:18:36 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
Hi all,
I've found discussions, but not an actual "recommended"
solution for the problem of "statement is not reachable"
warnings in templates with early returns, e.g.:
```
bool nobool(T...)() {
foreach (i, U; T) {
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 11:47:35 UTC, QAston wrote:
import std.meta;
template isBool(U)() = is(U == bool);
static if (!allSatisfy!(isBool, T)) {
return true; // no longer emits a warning
}
Something like this should work.
Thanks, but:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 11:18:36 UTC,
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:50:34 UTC, Dsby wrote:
foreach (i ; 0..4) {
auto th = new Thread(delegate(){listRun(i);});//this is erro
_thread[i]= th;
th.start();
}
void listRun(int i)
{
writeln("i = ", i); // the value is not(0,1,2,3), it all
is 2.
}
I want to
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 10:04:53 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 09:57:37 UTC, Jeff Thompson wrote:
In the following code, I explicitly declare array as
immutable. But it compiles with the error shown below in the
comment. The array object is declared immutable, so ho
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 17:40:27 UTC, Lass Safin wrote:
Why:
enum Base {
A,
B,
}
enum Derived : Base {
C, // Gives error, says it can't implicitly convert
expression to Base.
D = 1, // Same error
E = cast(Base)294, // Finally works. Can only be
cast(Derived) instead
Why:
enum Base {
A,
B,
}
enum Derived : Base {
C, // Gives error, says it can't implicitly convert
expression to Base.
D = 1, // Same error
E = cast(Base)294, // Finally works. Can only be
cast(Derived) instead.
}
void func(Derived d) {}
func(Derived.E); // works.
func(
On 17/03/16 5:05 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 11:22:02 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Change those static if's to just plain old ifs.
But then this wouldn't compile, would it?
```
static if(__traits(compiles, __traits(getMember, a, "b"))) {
return a.b;
}
```
(real
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 16:02:33 UTC, Christof Schardt
wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Using rdmd. It assumes the filename will match the module name to
locate the file, though the language itself doesn't require this.
What you want to do to make this work is use ordinary dmd and
pass b
The module declaration allows to define a module name different from the
filename.
(TDPL sec. 11.1.8)
I tried a simple example:
File test.d:
-
import bbb;
-
File aaa.d (same directory):
-
module bbb;
-
Running
rdmd test.d
does give an error: "module bbb is i
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 09:57:37 UTC, Jeff Thompson wrote:
In the following code, I explicitly declare array as immutable.
But it compiles with the error shown below in the comment. The
array object is declared immutable, so how can the compiler say
it is a mutable object? In summary, how
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 12:20:32 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 12:17:42 UTC, Orkhan wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 18:26:48 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I don't know where from shpuld I get help. Thanks.
Is the xcomm library available somewhere, maybe if
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 15:10:56 UTC, Alex wrote:
void* funVoldemort(size_t my_size)
The term 'voldemort type' refers to a public type, just an
unnamed one. What you have here is a pointer to a private type...
and void* is something you often should avoid since the compiler
doesn't
Finally. A question about Voldemort types :)
I have the following class, with an accompanying function. Skip
the code to the link for a runnable version.
/*--- code begin ---*/
class roof
{
int huhu = 9;
void* funVoldemort(size_t my_size)
{
auto gg = huhu;
if(my_size
On 03/17/2016 09:32 AM, Jeff Thompson wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 11:27:01 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 10:11:43 UTC, Jeff Thompson wrote:
This is a simplified example from a larger class I have where I need
an immutable constructor. This is because I need
Hello,
I want to know if a port of an ip address is listening, actually,
I've this :
http://pastebin.com/pZhm0ujy
(checking port 22/ssh)
It works, but it took me ~10min to scan 30 addresses.
How can reduce the expiration delay ?
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 17:31:11 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/18/2016 09:14 AM, Dsby wrote:
[...]
Here is one that puts 'shared' in a lot of places:
import std.stdio;
import std.concurrency;
[...]
thanks.
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:24:38 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
Hi D gurus,
is there a way to obtain parameter names within the function
body? I am particularly interested in variadic functions.
Something like:
void myfun(T...)(T x){
foreach(i, arg; x)
writeln(i, " : ", arg);
When a string is not an in parameter, it can't be declared `in
char[]`.
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 11:09:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:50:34 UTC, Dsby wrote:
foreach (i ; 0..4) {
auto th = new Thread(delegate(){listRun(i);});//this is erro
_thread[i]= th;
th.start();
}
void listRun(int i)
{
writeln("i = ",
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 18:40:56 Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> should it be a compiler warning to assign a negative literal to
> an unsigned without a cast ?
Maybe? It's a common enough thing to do that I'm willing to bet that Walter
would object, but what you're really look
Hi D gurus,
is there a way to obtain parameter names within the function
body? I am particularly interested in variadic functions.
Something like:
void myfun(T...)(T x){
foreach(i, arg; x)
writeln(i, " : ", arg);
}
void main(){
myfun(a = 2, b = "two", c = 2.0);
}
// should p
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 17:08:20 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 11:47:35 UTC, QAston wrote:
import std.meta;
template isBool(U)() = is(U == bool);
static if (!allSatisfy!(isBool, T)) {
return true; // no longer emits a warning
}
Something like this should
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 22:07:39 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
size_t pos = "banana".indexOf("c");
if (pos > 0) {
Although I also think it makes sense to warn (in specific cases)
about mixed-sign comparisons, the example you give here does
nothing that we can warn about. It is a comparison o
Hi,
I saw from the forum that functions with string like arguments
better use `in char[]` instead of `string` type, because then it
can accept both string and char[] types.
But recently when actually using D, I found that many phobos
functions/constructors use `string`, while many returns `c
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 10:01:41 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Yes and that's the opposite that should happend: when signed
and unsigned are mixed in a comparison, the unsigned value
should be implictly cast to a wider signed value. And then it
works!
That would be reasonable. Whether it's actu
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:53:42 UTC, JR wrote:
void printVars(Args...)()
if (Args.length > 0)
{
import std.stdio : writefln;
foreach (i, arg; Args) {
writefln("%s\t%s:\t%s", typeof(Args[i]).stringof,
Args[i].stringof, arg);
}
}
void main() {
int abc = 3;
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 10:24:41 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 10:01:41 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:33:25 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
[...] The reason that *attempting* such a comparison produces
such weird results, is because the signe
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 10:01:41 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:33:25 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
[...] The reason that *attempting* such a comparison produces
such weird results, is because the signed value is being
implicitly cast to an unsigned type.
Yes and that's
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 23:35:42 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
`ulong.max` and `-1L` are fundamentally different semantically,
even with two's complement modular arithmetic.
Different types implies different semantics, but not the literals
in isolation.
Under modular arithmetics for an ubyte the
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:33:25 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
[...] The reason that *attempting* such a comparison produces
such weird results, is because the signed value is being
implicitly cast to an unsigned type.
Yes and that's the opposite that should happend: when signed and
unsigned ar
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 09:35:00 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
Both of the literals I used in my example explicitly indicate
the type, not just the value.
Yes, but few people specify unsigned literals and relies on them
being implicitly cast to unsigned. You don't want to type 0UL and
1UL all t
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 09:50:12 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Looking at an strace of nmap, it seems it opens a bunch of
sockets, puts them into non-blocking mode, calls connect on
them (which will return EINPROGRESS), and then uses select(2)
to wait for them (in a loop, until all have either be
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 04:17:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The only thing that I'm aware of that Walter has thought
_might_ be something that we should change is allowing the
comparison between signed and unsigned integers, and if you
read what he says in the bug report for it, he clea
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 17:34:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/16/16 7:18 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
Hi all,
I've found discussions, but not an actual "recommended"
solution for
the problem of "statement is not reachable" warnings in
templates with
early returns, e.g.:
```
boo
On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 08:49:29 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 23:35:42 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
`ulong.max` and `-1L` are fundamentally different
semantically, even with two's complement modular arithmetic.
Different types implies different semantics, but not
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 11:22:02 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Change those static if's to just plain old ifs.
This only works (sometimes) because D's value range propagation
doesn't understand comparisons or normal if statements very well.
This will hopefully be fixed sooner or later:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 22:46:01 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
In the same way, using `cast(ulong)` to pass `-1L` to a
function that expects a `ulong` results in a de-facto loss of
information, because that `-1L` can no longer distinguished
from `ulong.max`, despite the fundamental semantic diffe
Looking at an strace of nmap, it seems it opens a bunch of
sockets, puts them into non-blocking mode, calls connect on them
(which will return EINPROGRESS), and then uses select(2) to wait
for them (in a loop, until all have either been accepted or
rejected). select(2) accepts a timeout value,
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:24:38 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
Hi D gurus,
is there a way to obtain parameter names within the function
body? I am particularly interested in variadic functions.
Something like:
void myfun(T...)(T x){
foreach(i, arg; x)
writeln(i, " : ", arg);
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:53:42 UTC, JR wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:24:38 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
Hi D gurus,
is there a way to obtain parameter names within the function
body? I am particularly interested in variadic functions.
Something like:
void myfun(T...)(T x)
On 16/03/16 11:18 PM, Johan Engelen wrote:
Hi all,
I've found discussions, but not an actual "recommended" solution for
the problem of "statement is not reachable" warnings in templates with
early returns, e.g.:
```
bool nobool(T...)() {
foreach (i, U; T) {
static if (is(U == boo
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 01:57:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
or wrap your integers in types that have more restrictive
rules. IIRC, at least one person around here has done that
already so that they can catch integer overflow - which is
basically what you're complaining about here.
Tha
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 22:22:15 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
import core.thread; // for .seconds
Nitpick: `seconds` is defined in `core.time`; `core.thread` just
reexports it.
s.setOption(SocketOptionLevel.SOCKET, SNDTIMEO, 10.seconds);
s.setOption(SocketOptionLevel.SOCKET, RCVTIMEO, 10.
On Friday, March 18, 2016 21:17:42 Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, March 18, 2016 23:48:32 tsbockman via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > I'm basically saying, "because information is lost when casting
> > between signed and unsigned, all such casts should be explicit".
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:44:12 UTC, Lucien wrote:
Hello,
I want to know if a port of an ip address is listening,
actually, I've this :
http://pastebin.com/pZhm0ujy
(checking port 22/ssh)
It works, but it took me ~10min to scan 30 addresses.
How can reduce the expiration delay ?
I
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 01:57:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Just assigning one to the other really isn't a problem, and
sometimes you _want_ the wraparound. If you assume that it's
always the case that assigning a negative value to an unsigned
type is something that programmers don't wa
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 11:27:01 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
Also, if you mark the constructor as pure, new C() should be
implicitly convertible to an immutable C.
Ah! That's a good tip. Now I understand why I never have to say
`new immutable(C)()` in my own code. (I am in the habit of
On 03/18/2016 03:50 AM, Dsby wrote:
foreach (i ; 0..4) {
auto th = new Thread(delegate(){listRun(i);});//this is erro
_thread[i]= th;
th.start();
}
void listRun(int i)
{
writeln("i = ", i); // the value is not(0,1,2,3), it all is 2.
}
I want to know how to use it like std
On 3/18/16 10:58 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 14:53:20 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/18/16 7:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 10:20:40 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi !
I wonder if i can rely on this code :
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/745cc5b1cdfb
On 3/17/16 6:46 PM, tsbockman wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 17:09:46 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Converting unsigned to signed or vice versa (of the same size type) is
safe. No information is lost.
Saying that "no information is lost" in such a case, is like saying that
if I encryp
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 22:22:15 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 20:44:12 UTC, Lucien wrote:
Hello,
I want to know if a port of an ip address is listening,
actually, I've this :
http://pastebin.com/pZhm0ujy
(checking port 22/ssh)
It works, but it took me ~10min t
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 15:07:53 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 15:03:14 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/18/16 10:58 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 18 March 2016 at 14:53:20 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/18/16 7:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
[..
89 matches
Mail list logo
