On 07/11/2016 02:31 AM, Adam Sansier wrote:
idup uses the gc, I am currently just malloc'ing the string and allowing
for the memory leak. This is somewhat acceptable given that this code
should rarely be called and generally only at startup. It will generally
waste only a few KB of memory.
If
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 02:35:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2016 01:16:11 Adam Sansier via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
It's more a case that you're just making life harder for
yourself if you avoid the GC. Some programs (like AAA games)
are going to need to
On Monday, July 11, 2016 01:16:11 Adam Sansier via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Thanks. I'd rather prematurely optimize out the gc then have to
> go back and get it to work. It's not hard to write non-gc code,
> it's been done for ages. But having some compiler help makes
> things nice. It seems
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 01:58:23 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
I'm using some win functions that don't use the gc and are not
marked, specifically CLSIDFromString that I imported
myself(it's not marked nogc in objbase).
I went ahead and copied the import and added nogc. Shouldn't
someone add
I'm using some win functions that don't use the gc and are not
marked, specifically CLSIDFromString that I imported myself(it's
not marked nogc in objbase).
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 01:08:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2016 00:37:39 Adam Sansier via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
When manually managing memory, you're dealing with basically
the same constructs that you would have in C/C++. I mean,
you're even using the
On Monday, July 11, 2016 00:37:39 Adam Sansier via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Also, When dealing with a complex tree like structure, is there
> an easy way to recursively free it by free'ing all the sub
> elements?
When manually managing memory, you're dealing with basically the same
constructs
On Monday, July 11, 2016 00:31:10 Adam Sansier via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> So, I have to create some nogc code. Basically all it uses is
> idup to create a string that is passed as a return value. It
> seems this is necessary or the string will be reused and
> corrupted.
>
> idup uses the gc,
Also, When dealing with a complex tree like structure, is there
an easy way to recursively free it by free'ing all the sub
elements?
Also, since I'm dealing with simple structs and strings, maybe I
more intelligent string type can be used? One that uses opAssign
to do reference counting? I
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 23:38:26 ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 07/10/2016 11:26 PM, Adam Sansier wrote:
> > For example, I'm trying to compare a wchar buffer with a wstring using
> > slices:
> >
> > x[0..$] == y[0..$]
> >
> > It fails. I think because x has length 1024. If do
> >
>
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 21:27:14 pineapple via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:20:34 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> > The problem you encounter here is that templatized functions
> > cannot be virtual. If you remove "abstract" and put an empty
> > body than it works, but you
On 07/10/2016 11:38 PM, Adam Sansier wrote:
Using this code
import core.stdc.wchar_; // For wcslen.
Hint: D has special syntax for importing only specific parts of a module:
import core.std.wchar_: wcslen;
wstring toWstring(wchar[] value)
{
return value ? cast(wstring)
On 07/10/2016 11:26 PM, Adam Sansier wrote:
For example, I'm trying to compare a wchar buffer with a wstring using
slices:
x[0..$] == y[0..$]
It fails. I think because x has length 1024. If do
x[0..y.length] == str[0..y.length]
it fails, also because y has length 1024(since it was generated
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:27:14 UTC, pineapple wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:20:34 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
The problem you encounter here is that templatized functions
cannot be virtual. If you remove "abstract" and put an empty
body than it works, but you lose the whole OOP thing,
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:26:29 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
For example, I'm trying to compare a wchar buffer with a
wstring using slices:
x[0..$] == y[0..$]
It fails. I think because x has length 1024. If do
x[0..y.length] == str[0..y.length]
it fails, also because y has length 1024(since
On 07/10/2016 11:17 PM, Adam Sansier wrote:
The problem is things like
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724902(v=vs.85).aspx
require data buffers to be used. I can't just plug in a wstring to it,
can I?
You can't.
`First-chance exception:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:20:34 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
The problem you encounter here is that templatized functions
cannot be virtual. If you remove "abstract" and put an empty
body than it works, but you lose the whole OOP thing, i.e you
cannot call the most derived override from the base.
For example, I'm trying to compare a wchar buffer with a wstring
using slices:
x[0..$] == y[0..$]
It fails. I think because x has length 1024. If do
x[0..y.length] == str[0..y.length]
it fails, also because y has length 1024(since it was generated
from a buffer and the length wasn't set
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:20:34 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:06:42 UTC, pineapple wrote:
[...]
It comes from the fact that the VTBL cannot be build from a
template.
See https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1657#c1
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 21:06:42 UTC, pineapple wrote:
This is essentially what I'm trying to accomplish. The
intuitive solution, of course, does not work. In theory I could
write a separate method for every anticipated return type, but
that would be horrible and in that case I'd probably
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 20:31:34 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:50:28 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:44:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:19:57 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
Is it possible to turn temporary char/wchar
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 07:20:29 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 09:01:10 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
`foo()` is effectively a delegate, therefore `const` applies
to the context.
AFAIK const on a function can only ever refer to the `this`
pointer, but there is no `this` pointer.
This is essentially what I'm trying to accomplish. The intuitive
solution, of course, does not work. In theory I could write a
separate method for every anticipated return type, but that would
be horrible and in that case I'd probably just write the damn
thing in a dynamically-typed language
On 07/10/2016 10:31 PM, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
That said, if you want char[] -> string or wchar[] -> wstring you can
use assumeUnique, which casts a mutable array to an immutable one.
After having ensured that the array is actually unique. That is, there
must not be any other references to
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:50:28 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:44:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:19:57 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
Is it possible to turn temporary char/wchar buffer in to a
string to be used by string functions rather than
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:50:28 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
But I need to compare the results, case insensitive, to a
string(since that is what D uses). It's being a real pain in
the butt to deal with the mixture.
Are your strings literals or generated somewhere else?
You can stick a w at
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:44:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:19:57 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
Is it possible to turn temporary char/wchar buffer in to a
string to be used by string functions rather than having to
convert?
What string functions in particular? If
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 19:19:57 UTC, Adam Sansier wrote:
Is it possible to turn temporary char/wchar buffer in to a
string to be used by string functions rather than having to
convert?
What string functions in particular? If they are written
correctly, it should just work mutable
Is it possible to turn temporary char/wchar buffer in to a string
to be used by string functions rather than having to convert?
I'm working with win32 and have to use char*'s. This requires a
lot of in place case conversions and comparisons and such. I want
to avoid the gc too.
I could use
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 04:11:59 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
Are you using any of their source code from the vst sdk? If you
hand re-write any of their source code, it is yours.
That could actually be considered to be a translation and a
derived work. If you implement from a
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 23:19:13 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I do have (Steinberg) ASIO binding in D.
The problem is I couldn't release the bindings. I've asked
Steinberg if it was OK to release D bindings and they were
strongly against it unfortunately (and this was over 3 years
On Thursday, 5 January 2012 at 22:15:32 UTC, asm wrote:
how can i implementing the singleton pattern in D?
https://p0nce.github.io/d-idioms/#Leveraging-TLS-for-a-fast-thread-safe-singleton
On Sunday, 10 July 2016 at 07:00:18 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 07:52:56 UTC, Antonio Corbi wrote:
I use the "preGenerateCommands" and "dependencies" like this:
"configurations" : [
{
"comment" : "Classic app.",
"name"
On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 09:01:10 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
`foo()` is effectively a delegate, therefore `const` applies to
the context.
AFAIK const on a function can only ever refer to the `this`
pointer, but there is no `this` pointer.
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 07:52:56 UTC, Antonio Corbi wrote:
I use the "preGenerateCommands" and "dependencies" like this:
"configurations" : [
{
"comment" : "Classic app.",
"name": "eqapp",
"preGenerateCommands" :
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 20:47:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/09/2016 01:35 PM, Suliman wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 January 2012 at 22:53:12 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
>> On 01/05/2012 02:15 PM, asm wrote:
>>> how can i implementing the singleton pattern in D?
>>
>> Is singleton still alive? ;)
36 matches
Mail list logo
