On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 15:47:43 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
If you use this option, do be aware that this feature has been
> scheduled for future deprecation [1].
It's likely going to continue working for quite a while
(years), though.
[1]
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 00:07:26 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 23:11:56 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 19:56:06 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
It is deliberately not possible. reproducible builds security
ect.
have a look at dubs
Hello
I'd like to use the vibed.web.auth framework for authentication
in my vibe.d app. If a user is not authorized to access a certain
page, he should be redirected to another page (a custom error
page for example, or the login page in my case). At the moment,
I'm using the following
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:59:16 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:02:21 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
I have an icon that I toggle which clicked. It seems that I
can't toggle it any faster than about a second.
The handler is being called each click but it seems the
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:59:16 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:02:21 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
I have an icon that I toggle which clicked. It seems that I
can't toggle it any faster than about a second.
The handler is being called each click but it seems the
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:56:37 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:19:57 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
Why would that be. Program take about 4 seconds to compile and
12 for x64. There is fundamentally no difference between the
two versions. I do link in gtk x86 and gtk
Thank you for explanation.
It fix my problem with compilation. I was using
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/blob/master/examples/web-auth/source/app.d as example and there is @safe function. I try to compile it with newest (beta) version of vibe.d and it compiled too (so i suspect in
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:02:21 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
I have an icon that I toggle which clicked. It seems that I
can't toggle it any faster than about a second.
The handler is being called each click but it seems the gui is
not updated more than about 1fps in that case? Although,
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:19:57 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
Why would that be. Program take about 4 seconds to compile and
12 for x64. There is fundamentally no difference between the
two versions. I do link in gtk x86 and gtk x64 depending on
version, and that's it as far as I can tell.
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 22:02:07 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 13:42:33 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
You can still create a (scope) class on the stack, escape a
reference to it using `move` and use it afterwards, all
within the rules of @safe, so I'm not convinced that the
Why would that be. Program take about 4 seconds to compile and 12
for x64. There is fundamentally no difference between the two
versions. I do link in gtk x86 and gtk x64 depending on version,
and that's it as far as I can tell.
Debug
x86 4
x64 12
Release
x86 3
x64
I have an icon that I toggle which clicked. It seems that I can't
toggle it any faster than about a second.
The handler is being called each click but it seems the gui is
not updated more than about 1fps in that case? Although, I'm sure
it update faster than 1fps, just seems the icon/image
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 13:42:33 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
You can still create a (scope) class on the stack, escape a
reference to it using `move` and use it afterwards, all within
the rules of @safe, so I'm not convinced that the reason for
deprecating scoped classes is gone yet.
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 20:57:08 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 07-08-17 22:46, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
This appears to be a GTK issue, a work around might be to get
the Window handle from gtk and use the Windows API to set the
taskbar visibility.
Yeah, I was thinking about that but
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 21:01:33 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 06-08-17 21:27, FoxyBrown wrote:
[...]
Also seems to be working properly with a Separator.
Ok, I guess it's on my end, I don't see how since I'm not doing a
hell of a lot and only gtk is calling those event handlers, I'll
try to
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 23:44:27 UTC, greatsam4sure wrote:
Good day. I will appreciate it if anybody here can help me with
the step by step way of installing ldc D compiler on windows. I
have read online info but i just don't get it. let the process
be in steps for easy
On 06-08-17 21:27, FoxyBrown wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 18:26:20 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 06-08-17 16:58, FoxyBrown wrote:
I don't really(my code is a bit more complex) but basically all it
boils down to is a UI with some nested widgets (an overlay, an box,
and a box and one contains
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 20:39:40 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
What is the status of the platform?
I might be doing some number crunching on one of the power8
beasts, would be nice to have D working there.
Not that bad afaik. LDC should be able to build itself, the
runtime libs and their
On 07-08-17 22:46, Johnson Jones wrote:
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 20:56:10 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
Windows will only show the taskbar icon if you are not running the
application from the console.
Now in x64 it is showing, not in x86. So, not sure what's going on but
at least it is
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 20:56:10 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
Windows will only show the taskbar icon if you are not running
the application from the console.
Now in x64 it is showing, not in x86. So, not sure what's going
on but at least it is showing. I was in a windows console and
added a
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 16:47:14 UTC, holo wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to use auth framework with REST api (
http://vibed.org/api/vibe.web.auth/ ).
Is it possible to use it with registerRestInterface? According
to description under:
http://vibed.org/api/vibe.web.auth/requiresAuth it should
What is the status of the platform?
I might be doing some number crunching on one of the power8
beasts, would be nice to have D working there.
---
Dmitry Olshansky
thank you aberba
ok, so this is useless to me.
i want something fully functional stand-alone tools.
i have no internet connection there.
Don't worry, DlangUI is stand-alone: you only need the connection
to download it, but not to use it nor to compile with. Dub will
function without
and I do have skipTaskbar disabled... tried enabling it with no
long... and fidgeting with other settings and using a Window
instead of Application Window.
Maybe gtk needs to be told that that the window is the "main
window" of the application?
On Saturday, 5 August 2017 at 20:56:10 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 05-08-17 20:14, Johnson Jones wrote:
When trying to center the window. If one uses ALWAYS_CENTERED
any resizing of the window is totally busted. CENTER also does
not work. move(0,0) seems to not be relative to the main
display.
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 16:13:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 19:27:15 UTC, FoxyBrown wrote:
I don't know gtk, but I would suspect moving the mouse over the
child triggers the enter/leave notifications too and it bubbles
up to
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 19:27:15 UTC, FoxyBrown wrote:
I don't know gtk, but I would suspect moving the mouse over the
child triggers the enter/leave notifications too and it bubbles
up to the parent.
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 10:42:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-08-06 17:47, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
If you use this option, do be aware that this feature has been
scheduled
for future deprecation [1].
It's likely going to continue working for quite a while
(years), though.
It's
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 13:40:18 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Thanks, I wasn't aware of this. I tried fooling around scope
classes and DIP1000 for a bit and was surprised that this is
allowed:
---
import core.stdc.stdio : printf;
import std.algorithm : move;
class A
{
int i;
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 10:50:21 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 15:47:43 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
If you use this option, do be aware that this feature has been
scheduled for future deprecation [1].
It's likely going to continue working for quite a while
(years), though.
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 00:07:26 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 23:11:56 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 19:56:06 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
It is deliberately not possible. reproducible builds security
ect.
have a look at dubs
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 04:47:56 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 23:33:26 UTC, greatsam4sure wrote:
import std.math;
import std.stdio;
cos(90*PI/180) = -2.7e-20 instead of zero. I will appreciate
any help. thanks in advance.
tan(90*PI/180) = -3.689e+19 instead of
On Sunday, 6 August 2017 at 15:47:43 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
If you use this option, do be aware that this feature has been
scheduled for future deprecation [1].
It's likely going to continue working for quite a while
(years), though.
[1]
On 2017-08-06 17:47, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
If you use this option, do be aware that this feature has been scheduled
for future deprecation [1].
It's likely going to continue working for quite a while (years), though.
It's used all over the place in the DMD code base.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
34 matches
Mail list logo
