On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 20:54:03 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 20:10:58 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 18:59:30 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
[...]
Cannot reproduce under Linux with dmd 2.076.0 (with commented
out Windows-only check). I'll tr
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 04:45:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, September 03, 2017 21:22:14 Ali Çehreli via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
Much as some people have been doing it for some reason, I
really don't understand why anyone would be unzipping the .zip
file on top of
On Sunday, September 03, 2017 21:22:14 Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 09/03/2017 09:03 PM, Joel wrote:
> > One of my small programs doesn't compile any more since, said, DMD
> > versions.
> >
> > I've got other programs that do work, but I can't see what's different
> > about
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 23:30:43 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 04:01:34 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 03:29:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 02:49:41 UTC, Ilya
Yaroshenko wrote:
[...]
Thanks. Se
On 09/03/2017 09:03 PM, Joel wrote:
> One of my small programs doesn't compile any more since, said, DMD
> versions.
>
> I've got other programs that do work, but I can't see what's different
> about them?!
>
> I'm using macOS.
>
> [1] Here is the program and stuff. It uses DSFML 2.1.1, but I have
One of my small programs doesn't compile any more since, said,
DMD versions.
I've got other programs that do work, but I can't see what's
different about them?!
I'm using macOS.
[1] Here is the program and stuff. It uses DSFML 2.1.1, but I
haven't added the dynamic files for it.
giver ~ma
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 03:08:50 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 01:50:48 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 23:25:47 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 11:48:38 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September
In coming up with a solution that maps enums to templates, I
think it might provide a means to allow template like behavior at
runtime. That is, type information is contained with in the enum
which then can, with the use of compile time templates, be
treated as dynamic behaviors.
Let me expla
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 01:50:48 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 23:25:47 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 11:48:38 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 04:18:03 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 23:25:47 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 11:48:38 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 04:18:03 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 02:39:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 Septembe
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 01:41:14 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 11:33:15 UTC, Biotronic wrote:
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 10:15:09 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
So I have the following types
struct DevicePointer(T) { T* ptr; }
struct Buffer(T)
{
void
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 04:01:34 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 03:29:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 02:49:41 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 19:39:14 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Is there a way to c
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 11:48:38 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 04:18:03 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 02:39:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 23:12:35 UTC,
EntangledQuanta wrote:
[...]
The contexts
I've been trying to figure out how to generate documentation for
my project using dub. I have found this link[1] which told me how
I could use dub to generate docs:
dub build --build=docs
However, I wish to have a set of macros that are present on every
documentation file, that would def
I can't find anywhere describing how to change the extension of
the generated doc files.
I've tried `-of.php`, but it still generates .html.
I'm probably missing something here that's going to make me feel
silly.
Clear explanation, thanks!
I think it would avoid a lot of confusion to disallow the alias f
= c1.field notation and only allow the alias f = C.field
notation. If necessary one could use alias f = typeof(c1).field
On 09/03/2017 08:54 PM, Eric_DD wrote:
*** This works:
struct Array {
void foo() { writeln("foo"); }
}
mixin template arrayOperations(arrays...) {
void foo() {
foreach(ref a; arrays) a.foo();
}
}
class Thing {
Array data1;
Array data2;
mixin arrayOperatio
I am running into something that seems a bit inconsistent.
When I pass an alias of a member to a mixin it works, but a
member to member doesn't.
It seems like the alias is evaluated to the last symbol before
passing it to the mixin.
If that's true, is there a way to defer the evaluation?
Any
On 09/03/2017 03:03 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
> On 09/03/2017 01:39 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> If we can convert byte-by-byte, we should be able to
>> convert back byte-by-byte, right?
>
> You weren't converting byte-by-byte.
In my mind I was! :o)
> Or maybe just convert everything to UTF-8 first. That
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 11:23:00 UTC, Igor wrote:
I realize these are not yet stable but I would like to know if
I am doing something wrong or is it a lib bug.
My first attempt was to do this:
theAllocator = allocatorObject(Region!MmapAllocator(1024*MB));
If I got it right th
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 04:18:03 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 02:39:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 23:12:35 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
[...]
The contexts being independent of each other doesn't change
that we would still
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 22:10:43 UTC, Biotronic wrote:
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 19:39:14 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Is there a way to create a 24-bit int? One that for all
practical purposes acts as such? This is for 24-bit stuff like
audio. It would respect endianness, allow for
On 09/03/2017 01:39 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Ok, I see that I made a mistake but I still don't think the conversion
is one way. If we can convert byte-by-byte, we should be able to convert
back byte-by-byte, right?
You weren't converting byte-by-byte. You were only converting the
significant by
23 matches
Mail list logo
