On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 21:55:23 UTC, Igor wrote:
Hi All,
I switched from using free functions in DerelictGL3 to
DerelictGL3_Contexts and compilation speed in optimized build
using DMD went from 2 seconds to 7 minutes and using LDC from 2
seconds to 10 seconds. Is this a known
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 19:59:52 UTC, Joseph wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 10:08:11 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
[...]
The compiler shouldn't arbitrarily force one to make arbitrary
decisions that waste time and money.
My solution was to turn those static this's in to
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 19:59:52 UTC, Joseph wrote:
The compiler shouldn't arbitrarily force one to make arbitrary
decisions that waste time and money.
You might want to educate yourself about arbitrary decisions that
waste time and money:
Hi All,
I switched from using free functions in DerelictGL3 to
DerelictGL3_Contexts and compilation speed in optimized build
using DMD went from 2 seconds to 7 minutes and using LDC from 2
seconds to 10 seconds. Is this a known problem? Are there any
workarounds?
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 19:44:19 UTC, vino wrote:
Hi All,
I have a small piece of code which executes perfectly 8 out of
10 times, very rarely it throws an assertion error, so is there
a way to find which line of code is causing this error.
You should be getting the line number as
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 19:59:52 UTC, Joseph wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 10:08:11 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 09:11:20 UTC, Joseph wrote:
I have two nearly duplicate files I added a static this() to
initialize some static members of an
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 10:08:11 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 09:11:20 UTC, Joseph wrote:
I have two nearly duplicate files I added a static this() to
initialize some static members of an interface.
On one file when I add an empty static this() it
Hi All,
I have a small piece of code which executes perfectly 8 out of 10
times, very rarely it throws an assertion error, so is there a
way to find which line of code is causing this error.
From,
Vino.B
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 13:55:17 UTC, lithium iodate
wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:29:53 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help in printing the below array output as per
the below required output
As a fan of stuffing as much as possible into one line:
void
On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 13:47:47 Azi Hassan via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 01:13:29 UTC, Hasen Judy wrote:
> > Now, a lot of library functions seem to expect ranges as inputs
> > and return ranges as output.
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, it was done on purpose
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 13:15:01 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, it didn't work, the genrated out is as below
Oops, sorry. It should look like this:
writefln("%-(%s\n%)", array);
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:29:53 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help in printing the below array output as per
the below required output
As a fan of stuffing as much as possible into one line:
void main()
{ import std.stdio;
import std.range;
import
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 01:13:29 UTC, Hasen Judy wrote:
Now, a lot of library functions seem to expect ranges as inputs
and return ranges as output.
Unless I'm mistaken, it was done on purpose to reduce the amount
of memory allocations in the standard library so that it becomes
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:29:53 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help in printing the below array output as per
the below required output
Array Output:
["C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir1", "34",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir2", "36",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST3\\BACKUP\\dir1", "69"]
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:29:53 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Request your help in printing the below array output as per
the below required output
You can just loop over it and write the components with the tab
separator. Did you try that?
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 07:28:00 UTC, Anton Fediushin
wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:29:53 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help in printing the below array output as per
the below required output
Array Output:
["C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir1", "34",
I'm planning to use in a stateless microservices setup.
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 05:25:09 UTC, Hasen Judy wrote:
What libraries are people using to run webservers other than
vibe.d?
Don't get me wrong I like the async-io aspect of vibe.d but I
don't like the weird template language and the fact that it
caters to mongo crowd.
I think for D
The simplest example of a cycle is probably this:
module A;
import B;
int n1 = 17;
static this() {
n1 = n2;
}
//
module B;
import A;
int n2 = 42;
static this() {
n2 = n1;
}
What's the value of n1 and n2 after module constructors are run?
Since both module constructors can run
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 09:11:20 UTC, Joseph wrote:
I have two nearly duplicate files I added a static this() to
initialize some static members of an interface.
On one file when I add an empty static this() it crashes while
the other one does not.
The exception that happens is
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 09:11:20 UTC, Joseph wrote:
I have two nearly duplicate files I added a static this() to
initialize some static members of an interface.
On one file when I add an empty static this() it crashes while
the other one does not.
The exception that happens is
I have two nearly duplicate files I added a static this() to
initialize some static members of an interface.
On one file when I add an empty static this() it crashes while
the other one does not.
The exception that happens is
Cyclic dependency between module A and B.
Why does this occur on
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 17:57:14 UTC, pezi_pink wrote:
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 09:00:36 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
Fixed in v0.9.121
See example1 / TreeWidget for sample of adding / removing of
items.
Fantasic! Thank you very much :)
Feel free to submit issues on
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:23:57 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
It looks like the length needs to come first [1]. I think it
would be technically possible if you flipped the parameters but
you would become dependent on the ABI as well. I would
recommend a wrapper instead.
[1]
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:29:53 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help in printing the below array output as per
the below required output
Array Output:
["C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir1", "34",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir2", "36",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST3\\BACKUP\\dir1", "69"]
Hi All,
Request your help in printing the below array output as per the
below required output
Array Output:
["C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir1", "34",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir2", "36",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST3\\BACKUP\\dir1", "69"]
["C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\PROD_TEAM\\dir1", "34",
On 2017-09-12 01:03, Nordlöw wrote:
If I have a function like
`extern(C) void f(void *x, size_t x_sz)`
can I instead declare it as
`extern(C) void f(void[] x)`
?
It looks like the length needs to come first [1]. I think it would be
technically possible if you flipped the parameters but
27 matches
Mail list logo
