On Sunday, 24 September 2017 at 05:48:32 UTC, Tony wrote:
I am compiling a module (utils) with one function in it with
the -cov compiler option on Ubuntu 14.04 with DMD v2.073.2. I
then compile a "main module" with -cov that imports the "utils
module" and calls the one function. The *.lst outpu
I am compiling a module (utils) with one function in it with the
-cov compiler option on Ubuntu 14.04 with DMD v2.073.2. I then
compile a "main module" with -cov that imports the "utils module"
and calls the one function. The *.lst output file shows lines
that executed in the "main module". I w
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 02:50:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 23/09/2017 3:26 AM, Sergei Degtiarev wrote:
On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 04:06:08 UTC, Enjoys Math
wrote:
Here's my minimal D code (server.d):
public:
this(ushort port, string address="") {
super(& run);
user1234 wrote:
"if (__ctfe) {}" is a test happening at runtime. Both the if and the else
branches got compiled
nope. compiler knows about this special pseudovariable, and will not
generate code neither for condition, nor for ctfe branch.
On 09/23/2017 11:46 PM, user1234 wrote:
"if (__ctfe) {}" is a test happening at runtime. Both the if and the
else branches got compiled, this implies:
- more code to cache
- slower code
just to allow CTFE.
__ctfe is a constant, though. Any half-decent optimizer will throw away
the path that's
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 18:23:12 UTC, Juraj Mojzis
wrote:
Hi,
browsing trough phobos bugzilla I found a couple of open issues
regarding CTFE and basic math functions ( Issue 4177, 5227).
It looks to me that at least floor/ceil could by fixed by a
simple:
if (__ctfe) return simple_flo
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:34:13 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:17:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Thanks for wasting some of my life... Just curious about who
will justify the behavior and wha
Hi,
browsing trough phobos bugzilla I found a couple of open issues
regarding CTFE and basic math functions ( Issue 4177, 5227).
It looks to me that at least floor/ceil could by fixed by a
simple:
if (__ctfe) return simple_floor_impl(x);
But that looks too easy and would surely be implemented
Is it possible to tell if two objects represented by TypeInfo's
are convertible to each other?
Basically, is there a built in way to do this?
int x;
long y;
assert(typeid(x).isImplicitlyConvertibleTo(typeid(y));
Thanks
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 15:19:09 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I've added
buildType "release" {
buildOptions "releaseMode" "optimize" "inline"
dflags-posix-ldc "-flto=thin" "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"
}
to my dub.sdl and built (on Linux) as
/usr/bin/dub -v run --compiler=ldc2 --
I've added
buildType "release" {
buildOptions "releaseMode" "optimize" "inline"
dflags-posix-ldc "-flto=thin" "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"
}
to my dub.sdl and built (on Linux) as
/usr/bin/dub -v run --compiler=ldc2 --build=release
but neither the flag "-flto=thin" nor "-Xcc=-fuse
On 23-09-17 13:58, Mengu wrote:
hi all
i've successfully compiled phobos master with gmake on freebsd. (make
fails, i've no clue at all as to why)
how do i compile my project now against my local phobos with dub? with
plain dmd?
i tried (in dub.sdl):
- full path to new libphobos.so with -d
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 11:58:40 UTC, Mengu wrote:
hi all
i've successfully compiled phobos master with gmake on freebsd.
(make fails, i've no clue at all as to why)
how do i compile my project now against my local phobos with
dub? with plain dmd?
i tried (in dub.sdl):
- full pat
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 11:58:40 UTC, Mengu wrote:
hi all
i've successfully compiled phobos master with gmake on freebsd.
(make fails, i've no clue at all as to why)
how do i compile my project now against my local phobos with
dub? with plain dmd?
i tried (in dub.sdl):
- full pat
hi all
i've successfully compiled phobos master with gmake on freebsd.
(make fails, i've no clue at all as to why)
how do i compile my project now against my local phobos with dub?
with plain dmd?
i tried (in dub.sdl):
- full path to new libphobos.so with -defaultlib to dflags
- full path t
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 11:23:26 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 08:45:00 UTC, Mengu wrote:
[...]
So it fails:
trying to find if an element exists in an AA
in a regex
invoked as a callback from curl
inside a parallel foreach.
Interesting that it just st
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 11:23:26 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Only other thing I can suggest is try linking against a debug
phobos to see if you can get some more diagnostics.
You might also try LDC's -fsanitize=address option for catching
memory bugs.
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 08:45:00 UTC, Mengu wrote:
hello everyone
i have a small program that parses an xml file, holding a list
with 13610 elements. after making the list, it iterates over
the list (paralele), goes to a web site and grabs the related
data for that element.
it wor
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 09:37:54 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 23/09/2017 10:34 AM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 03:16:30 UTC, rikki
cattermole wrote:
Alternatively you can alter the package that dub already
knows about.
Does the trick more easily ;)
On 23/09/2017 10:34 AM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 03:16:30 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Alternatively you can alter the package that dub already knows about.
Does the trick more easily ;)
+1
That's the dirty trick I'm using too
You can also do the same for Ph
On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 03:16:30 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Alternatively you can alter the package that dub already knows
about.
Does the trick more easily ;)
+1
That's the dirty trick I'm using too
hello everyone
i have a small program that parses an xml file, holding a list
with 13610 elements. after making the list, it iterates over the
list (paralele), goes to a web site and grabs the related data
for that element.
it works perfect for the first 1K element in the list. after that
i
On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 14:43:28 UTC, Johan wrote:
Hi all,
```
auto foo(const int[3] x)
{
int[3] y = x;
y[0] = 1; // line 4
return y;
}
immutable int[3] a = [0,1,2];
immutable int[3] b = foo(a); // line 8
```
compiles with an error:
```
4: Error: cannot modify
23 matches
Mail list logo
