On Friday, 7 December 2018 at 01:21:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
There is no trace of the template in the library or the object
file. You can investigate the compiled symbols with e.g. the
'nm' tool on Linux systems:
// deneme.d:
void foo(T)(T t) {
import std.stdio;
writeln(t);
}
void
On Thu, 06 Dec 2018 22:50:49 +, albertas-jn wrote:
> If templates are a compile-time feature and instances of templates are
> generated by compiler at compile time, why is it possible to compile a
> template definition with dmd -lib or -c?
You compile files, not individual declarations like a
On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:37:34 +, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote:
> I'm trying to get the current function name and apparently the commented
> line errors out.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
Referring to nested functions is weird.
Dotted identifiers let you traverse aggregates. Modules, C++ namespaces
I'm trying to get the current function name and apparently the
commented line errors out.
What am I doing wrong?
https://run.dlang.io/is/EGsRU2
```
#!/usr/bin/rdmd
void main()
{
import std.experimental.all;
void foo() {
// __traits(identifier, mixin(__FUNCTION__)).writeln; //
On 12/06/2018 02:50 PM, albertas-jn wrote:
If templates are a compile-time feature and instances of templates are
generated by compiler at compile time, why is it possible to compile a
template definition with dmd -lib or -c?
There is no trace of the template in the library or the object file.
If templates are a compile-time feature and instances of
templates are generated by compiler at compile time, why is it
possible to compile a template definition with dmd -lib or -c?
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 22:50:49 UTC, albertas-jn wrote:
If templates are a compile-time feature and instances of
templates are generated by compiler at compile time, why is it
possible to compile a template definition with dmd -lib or -c?
Because to instantiate the source code is stil
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 12:50:34 UTC, Radu wrote:
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 11:09:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Which would be a real nice feature to have.
this is what I need, I guess I has to wait.
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 14:09:34 UTC, Jedzia wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 12:00:45 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
[...]
Thank you Andre, but that refers to ddox which is badly
applicable under windows, thanks to the "Unexpected OPTLINK
Termination at EIP=." problem.
A solution
Okay, what i am trying to achieve is simply not there.
BuildOption._docs is a enum, that is passed recursively to the
dependencies and switches doc building on and object building off
for the different generators (I missed to say that i am using dmd
-> "-o-", "-Dddocs").
What i was looking f
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 07:37:12 UTC, John Chapman wrote:
Is the compiler giving the non-mixed-in function special
treatment?
Yes, this is by design:
https://dlang.org/spec/template-mixin.html#mixin_scope
It allows you to have multiple functions in a mixin and override
them selectiv
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 12:00:45 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 02:08:13 UTC, Jedzia wrote:
dmd2-2.083.0, win
minimal dub init
with dub.json:
{
"description": "A minimal D application.",
"dependencies": {
"iz": "~>0.6.23"
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 11:09:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 11:04:23 UTC, learnfirst1 wrote:
my question is how to easy use struct static initializer
method with UDA.
Fake code:
struct DbColumn {
string name;
boolunique ;
bool
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 11:04:23 UTC, learnfirst1 wrote:
my question is how to easy use struct static initializer
method with UDA.
Fake code:
struct DbColumn {
string name;
boolunique ;
boolsigned ;
boolnullable ;
}
struct Order {
my question is how to easy use struct static initializer
method with UDA.
Fake code:
struct DbColumn {
string name;
boolunique ;
boolsigned ;
boolnullable ;
}
struct Order {
uint id;
@DbColumn({ .nullable= true}) // not w
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 07:37:12 UTC, John Chapman wrote:
Is the compiler giving the non-mixed-in function special
treatment?
I think you're running into this bug:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19365
I see that it is not limited to operator overloading, in general
the overl
16 matches
Mail list logo
