On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 15:48:44 UTC, Bogdan wrote:
What would be the most straight-forward way of mapping the
members of an enum to the members of another enum (one-to-one
mapping) at compile time?
I'd probably have either a definition of one in terms of the
other:
enum Other {
a =
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 09:59:25 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 May 2019 at 17:33:22 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
I've had this happen, too. I don't know for sure, but I think
it may be because the installers aren't prepared to do
updates, not on Windows, anyway.
My best success for upda
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 09:59:25 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 May 2019 at 17:33:22 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
I've had this happen, too. I don't know for sure, but I think
it may be because the installers aren't prepared to do
updates, not on Windows, anyway.
My best success for upda
I somehow managed to get debug symbols into my dub project in the past.
Now I'm trying to extend my dub configuration to use different libs for
debug and release versions.
"buildTypes" : {
"debug" : {
"libs-windows-x86_64" : ["user32", "gdi32", "mylib1_d_x64",
"mylib2_d_x64"],
On 2015-01-23 15:45:21 +, Stefan Frijters said:
Currently I'm using dub for the first time and I've run into two
problems so far.
2) I would like the file name of my final executable to depend on my
chosen --build and --config options (i.e.
--). Is this possible to do?
Pretty old quest
What would be the most straight-forward way of mapping the
members of an enum to the members of another enum (one-to-one
mapping) at compile time?
Hi,
Is there a way of asking which version of package XXX "dub fetch XXX"
will actually fetch. I would like to avoid checking the contents of
~/.dub/packages before and after.
--
Russel.
===
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road
On Friday, 26 April 2019 at 05:08:32 UTC, dokutoku wrote:
Is this a DUB or LDC bug?
It's a combination of at least 3 small bugs in the MinGW-w64
based libraries and should be fixed by
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/pull/3071.
On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 17:54:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Perhaps try Dustmite on it?
AFAIK, calling new on a struct should never return null. So
there must be something else not quite right here. But without
actual code it's anybody's guess as to what it might be.
The last time I heard som
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 11:34:35 UTC, Denis Feklushkin wrote:
Tried it, and xray also does not returns any info about my own
functions...
Maybe DUB caches binaries and linker links previous
non-instrumented object files?
I tried "dub clean" and "dub clean-caches" but maybe it is need
rem
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 09:12:24 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
Those calls are to templated functions I presume?
No
instantiated in your program and hence instrumented)
Also I changed flags to "dflags-ldc":
["-fprofile-instr-generate", "-O0"] - second flag disables
optimisation (I assumed
On Tuesday, 7 May 2019 at 17:33:22 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
I've had this happen, too. I don't know for sure, but I think
it may be because the installers aren't prepared to do updates,
not on Windows, anyway.
My best success for updating has been to scrape D completely
off my drive (ie. unins
On 2019-05-09 20:42:54 +, Adam D. Ruppe said:
i do web and gui
:-)
Though my gui library is 100% from scratch on linux, and... barely even
good enough for myself to use. I really need to write a new text edit
widget.
Ok, so a GUI based app framework really seems to be a "hot topic". I
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 06:59:52 UTC, Denis Feklushkin wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 05:46:29 UTC, Denis Feklushkin
wrote:
All another calls is made inside of this lambda - maybe
lambdas is not traced by profiler?
Tried to remove lambda with same result.
Command:
llvm-profdata sho
On Friday, May 10, 2019 11:54:44 AM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 05:32:25PM +, faissaloo via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> > On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 12:19:29 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
> > > On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 10:11:51 UTC, faissaloo wrote:
> > > > My
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 05:46:29 UTC, Denis Feklushkin wrote:
All another calls is made inside of this lambda - maybe lambdas
is not traced by profiler?
Tried to remove lambda with same result.
Command:
llvm-profdata show -all-functions -topn=10 default.profdata
returns huge amount
16 matches
Mail list logo
