On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 21:58:16 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I need to then work out what is the size of the internal units
within the 128-bit value, size in bytes,1 or 2, at compile time.
You can use the .sizeof property on the type.
```
import core.simd;
void main() {
ubyte16 a;
I am using SIMD and I have a case in a template where I am being
passed an argument that is a pointer to a 128-bit chunk of either
16 bytes or 8 uwords but I don’t know which? What’s the best way
to discover this at compile time - using the ‘is’ operator ? I
forget for the moment. It will only
On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 12:00:03 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
I would like to use OpenCL in D. Thus I try to use DerelictCL.
But I fail to use it I encounter this error message:
--
/opt/jonathan/jonathan-dlang_ldc2092/root/usr/include/d/derelict/opencl/constants.di(835):
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 16:14:24 UTC, wjoe wrote:
When receiving packets, the IP header contains the destination
address of your public IP (the router), which it will translate
to the local address according to the port forwarding setup.
Pardon me, I meant to say according to the
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 15:26:23 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 13:17:11 UTC, wjoe wrote:
- Choosing a port which isn't in use right now isn't good
enough because a few minutes later there may be another
program using it, too, and for the same reason.
But doesn't the
On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 12:00:03 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
I would like to use OpenCL in D. Thus I try to use DerelictCL.
But I fail to use it I encounter this error message:
Hello,
I don't have time at all at the moment for maintaining
DerelictCL, can you provide a fully working
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 13:17:11 UTC, wjoe wrote:
- Choosing a port which isn't in use right now isn't good
enough because a few minutes later there may be another program
using it, too, and for the same reason.
But doesn't the UDP header include the sender IP address? So
together with
On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 18:35:34 UTC, notna wrote:
well, I guess all your remarks are true... and irrelevant at
the same time.
please go back and read his first post starts with "I have
a project where I need to take and send UDP packets over the
Internet"...
... and continues
On 7/22/20 12:33 AM, James Gray wrote:
Is there a better way to achieve behaviour similar to rangeFuncIf
below? f gives a contrived example of when one might want this. g is
how one might try and achieve the same with std.range.choose.
import std.stdio;
import std.range : only, chain, join,
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 06:16:44 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 04:33:20 UTC, James Gray wrote:
[...]
it seems `choose` evaluates both arguments instead of using
lazy evaluation. IMO this is a broken API to me but it has been
like this for longer so this would
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 04:33:20 UTC, James Gray wrote:
Is there a better way to achieve behaviour similar to
rangeFuncIf
below? f gives a contrived example of when one might want this.
g is
how one might try and achieve the same with std.range.choose.
import std.stdio;
import std.range
11 matches
Mail list logo