On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 23:57:09 UTC, jfondren wrote:
You're returning a copy of a slice, so if this compiled nothing
useful would happen anyway. This works if `whatever()` returns
`ref dstring` instead, with no other changes. Search
https://dlang.org/spec/function.html for 'lvalue'
On Sunday, 5 September 2021 at 00:00:33 UTC, jfondren wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 23:50:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
Example:
dmd "hello world.d"
```
$ cat hello\ world.d
module helloworld;
void main() {
import std.stdio : writeln;
writeln("without the explicit 'module', this
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 23:50:33 UTC, Marcone wrote:
Example:
dmd "hello world.d"
```
$ cat hello\ world.d
module helloworld;
void main() {
import std.stdio : writeln;
writeln("without the explicit 'module', this file would");
writeln("be inferred to have an invalid
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 23:33:39 UTC, someone wrote:
```d
public class cSomething {
private:
dstring pstrWhatever = null;
public:
@safe dstring whatever() { return pstrWhatever; }
@safe void whatever(const dstring lstrWhatever) {
pstrWhatever = lstrWhatever; }
}
Example:
dmd "hello world.d"
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 20:06:27 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 20:05:17 UTC, Per Nordlöw
wrote:
```sh
time dmd import_std.d -o-
```
should be
```sh
time dmd -unittest import_std.d -o-
```
When you generate the object files, I get 13K vs. 75K from a file
```d
public class cSomething {
private:
dstring pstrWhatever = null;
public:
@safe dstring whatever() { return pstrWhatever; }
@safe void whatever(const dstring lstrWhatever) { pstrWhatever
= lstrWhatever; }
}
void main() {
cSomething lobjSomething = new cSomething();
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 20:05:17 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
```sh
time dmd import_std.d -o-
```
should be
```sh
time dmd -unittest import_std.d -o-
```
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 13:12:49 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Note that lexing and parsing is extremely quick, and I wouldn't
focus on trying to trim this out, you won't get much
performance out of that.
-Steve
For the record, a D file containing only `import std;` type
checks
Is there a reason for the absence of an `isAllocator` trait under
`std.experimental.allocator`?
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 18:20:51 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 15:41:51 UTC, eXodiquas wrote:
[...]
to extend on Brian Tiffin's reply, you can read from the
standard input stream (the data piped to your program) using
std.stdio's `stdin`
[...]
Brian
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 15:41:51 UTC, eXodiquas wrote:
Hello everyone,
I created a small little D program that reads in a string from
the command line and shuffles the letters of the nouns a bit
around. This is pretty straight forward, but what I see now
happening is a bit strange,
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 15:41:51 UTC, eXodiquas wrote:
Hello everyone,
I created a small little D program that reads in a string from
the command line and shuffles the letters of the nouns a bit
around. This is pretty straight forward, but what I see now
happening is a bit strange,
Hello everyone,
I created a small little D program that reads in a string from
the command line and shuffles the letters of the nouns a bit
around. This is pretty straight forward, but what I see now
happening is a bit strange, at least for me.
I am reading the args out of the main function
On 9/4/21 7:43 AM, Johan wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 03:18:01 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 00:09:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This is related to the bogonity of the current behaviour of
-unittest, which compiles *all* unittests of *all* imported modules,
On 9/4/21 5:42 AM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 03:18:01 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
As Steven Schveighoffer [pointed out][1], Phobos unittests are never
included in user code, regardless of whether `StdUnittest` is used.
Yes, but they are lexed and parsed, right?
Yes,
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 12:40:02 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Omg. It really seems like it's motivated to do a benchmark with
phobos unittests prefixed with
Should have been a reply to
The "never" is false, https://d.godbolt.org/z/c4oeYM7rG
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 12:40:02 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
then. I can make that refactoring in my favorite choice of
editor and see the result differ. In terms of binary size, and
speed and memory usage of check, build and link time.
Automated that is.
If we want this, shall we
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 12:31:33 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 09:42:46 UTC, Per Nordlöw
wrote:
Yes, but they are lexed and parsed, right?
Right, but that's the case regardless of `version(StdUnittest)`.
Omg. It really seems like it's motivated to do a
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 12:31:33 UTC, Dennis wrote:
Right, but that's the case regardless of `version(StdUnittest)`.
I don't think so. My guess is that `version(StdUnittest)` does
maximum parsing, maybe only lexing. How can one easily determine
if this is the fact? Behaviour of
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 09:42:46 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Yes, but they are lexed and parsed, right?
Right, but that's the case regardless of `version(StdUnittest)`.
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 03:18:01 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 00:09:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This is related to the bogonity of the current behaviour of
-unittest, which compiles *all* unittests of *all* imported
modules, even when you're compiling user
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 08:54:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 08:19:53 UTC, JG wrote:
[...]
You should be able to do that now with "sourceFiles" and
"sourcePaths". Just avoid the default "source" or "src"
directories and specify the paths and/or files
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 03:18:01 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
As Steven Schveighoffer [pointed out][1], Phobos unittests are
never included in user code, regardless of whether
`StdUnittest` is used.
Yes, but they are lexed and parsed, right?
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 08:19:53 UTC, JG wrote:
As a small comment regarding dub. I can't help wondering if it
really the best idea for each configuration to include
everything by default and then have to exclude things? This
means that when you add another configuration and source
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 08:05:16 UTC, JG wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:40:07 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:38:34 UTC, Andre Pany
wrote:
The Dustmite condition you are using seems very generic,
therefore this error message can be
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:40:07 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:38:34 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
The Dustmite condition you are using seems very generic,
therefore this error message can be triggered by various code
constellations. This might be the
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:38:34 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
The Dustmite condition you are using seems very generic,
therefore this error message can be triggered by various code
constellations. This might be the reasons why Dustmite is
running so long.
Overly generic test conditions
On Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 11:04:12 UTC, JG wrote:
Hi,
We hit a linking error (after upgrading to dub 1.26.0). I
thought I would try to use dustmite to create a reduced error
test case. One week later it is still running (depth 22). I
don't suppose there is anyway of determining when
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 06:18:52 UTC, JG wrote:
I tried again. What am I doing wrong?
cp source ~/tmp/source
cd ~/tmp/source
dub build --config prog1 2>&1 | grep "collect2: error: ld
returned 1 exit status"
echo $? #produces 0
find . -name *.o -delete
~/d/DustMite/dustmite -j ./ 'dub
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 06:18:52 UTC, JG wrote:
On Friday, 3 September 2021 at 19:56:30 UTC, JG wrote:
[...]
I tried again. What am I doing wrong?
cp source ~/tmp/source
cd ~/tmp/source
dub build --config prog1 2>&1 | grep "collect2: error: ld
returned 1 exit status"
echo $?
On Friday, 3 September 2021 at 19:56:30 UTC, JG wrote:
On Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 17:56:54 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 11:20:18 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
One way to get a very rough estimate is to take the square of
the current reduction (.reduced
32 matches
Mail list logo
