On Saturday, 23 July 2022 at 00:56:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/22/22 3:22 PM, Azi Hassan wrote:
Oh, interesting syntax. I was thinking something along the
lines of
```D
template printEnum(...) {
version(debug) {
... // everything we already did
} else {
On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 14:11:52 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 00:33:06 UTC, Azi Hassan wrote:
Where did you find it though ? I checked dmd --help and man
dmd before making this thread, but to no avail.
It was implemented as an internal debugging tool, not a
documente
On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 01:15:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/19/22 8:57 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
There's a slight bloat in the compiler symbol table when but
other than that it should be effective.
Obviously I didn't finish that thought...
"when `-debug` isn't used on
On Tuesday, 19 July 2022 at 22:41:43 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/19/22 5:43 PM, Azi Hassan wrote:
Just in case this is a consequence of the XY problem, the
reason why I'm looking for this is to make sure that the code
I wrote did evaluate to what I'm expecting it to. Right now I
do
On Tuesday, 19 July 2022 at 22:27:56 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2022 at 21:43:01 UTC, Azi Hassan wrote:
I'm wondering if the offers has the option of executing the
parts that can be evaluated at compile time and then replacing
them with the result of this evaluation.
Try the `-vcg
Hello,
Apologies in advance if this has been asked before. I can't find
the right words to express what I'm looking for, but essentially,
I'm wondering if the offers has the option of executing the parts
that can be evaluated at compile time and then replacing them
with the result of this eva
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 14:13:49 UTC, kdevel wrote:
I would expect this code
enforce3.d
---
import std.exception;
void main ()
{
int i = int.min;
enforce (i > 0);
}
---
to throw an "Enforcement failed" exception, but it doesn't:
$ dmd enforce3.d
$ ./enforce3
[nothing]
I wonder
On Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 03:50:15 UTC, arturg wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 at 17:37:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 05:31:03PM +, Azi Hassan via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
The D tour for structs uses a syntax similar to that of C++
in order to initialize a
The D tour for structs uses a syntax similar to that of C++ in
order to initialize a Person struct : Person p(30, 180). Is this
syntax supported in D ? Running that part of the code neither
works on the playground nor on my machine (dmd v2.076.0).
On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 at 17:32:15 UTC, Frank Like wrote:
Hi,everyone,
who can help me,about the "AssocArray to string is ok,but how
to get the AssocArray from string? ".
For example:
SysTime[][string] AATimes;
AATimes["a1"] =[SysTime(DateTime(2017, 1, 1, 12, 33,
33)),SysTime(DateTime(
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 at 06:46:27 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 at 06:38:46 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 at 06:15:16 UTC, Arun
Chandrasekaran wrote:
Is there a way to get the pointer or reference of an element
in Array(T)?
[...]
A general rule of thumb when it comes to operator precedence is
that when in doubt, add parenthesis.
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:16:16 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Your an idiot,
Your
Huh.
On Saturday, 16 September 2017 at 03:30:51 UTC, Joseph wrote:
Are there any simple direct serialization libraries where I can
mark elements of a class or struct that I want serialized with
an attribute and it will take care of all the rest(including
recursive structures, arrays, etc) then deser
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 01:13:29 UTC, Hasen Judy wrote:
Now, a lot of library functions seem to expect ranges as inputs
and return ranges as output.
Unless I'm mistaken, it was done on purpose to reduce the amount
of memory allocations in the standard library so that it becomes
@nogc
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 06:29:53 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi All,
Request your help in printing the below array output as per
the below required output
Array Output:
["C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir1", "34",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST2\\BACKUP\\dir2", "36",
"C:\\Temp\\TEST3\\BACKUP\\dir1", "69"]
["C
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 18:21:44 UTC, Azi Hassan wrote:
I tried to create a similar file structure on my Linux machine.
Here's the result of ls -R TEST1:
TEST1:
BACKUP
...
Upon further inspection it looks like I messed up the output.
[31460] - Array 1 for folder 1(all files in Fol
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 15:11:57 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 14:38:39 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi Azi,
The required out is like below
[31460] - Array 1 for folder 1(all files in Folder 1) of the
FS C:\\Temp\\TEST1\\BACKUP
[138] - Array 2 for folder 2(all fi
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 08:10:35 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
in the next line of the code i say to list only folders that
are greater than 10 Mb but this now is listing all folder
(folder whose size is less than 10 MB are getting listed, not
sure why.
Is the size in GB ? If so, then subdirTo
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 12:38:54 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:
Hi,
I read line from STDIN , and strip them
[code]
auto line_st = line.strip();
[/code]
However, I can't use result in another format routine. Assume
my input line is "foobar":
[code]
writeln("Stripped line is %s", line_st);
Hi,
I'm trying to create the following struct in betterC but I keep
getting undefined reference errors when I try to compile the code
:
import core.stdc.stdio;
struct Foo
{
float x;
float y;
float z;
};
extern(C) int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
/*auto foo =
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 09:44:09 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Hi,
The below code is consume more memory and slower can you
provide your suggestion on how to over come these issues.
You can start by dropping the .array conversions after
dirEntries. That way your algorithm will become lazy (as
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 05:45:18 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
In order to resolve the issue "Using closure causes GC
allocation" it was stated that we need to use delegates
Alternatively you can drop the functional style and use a foreach
loop that doesn't require delegates, but you'd still nee
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 09:22:25 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Output :
1
2
["C:\\Temp\\TEAM1\\BACKUP", "C:\\Temp\\TEAM2\\ARCHIVE"]
Required Output:
Test1 = 1
Test2 = 2
Path = ["C:\\Temp\\TEAM1\\BACKUP", "C:\\Temp\\TEAM2\\ARCHIVE"]
From,
Vino.B
If you just need it to be displayed then you can add
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 22:13:53 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 23:12:07 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 22:45:27 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 22:18:07 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
DMD64 D Compiler v2.075.1
-betterC as
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 at 12:54:48 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
If you're wanting to use appender just make an appender and
replace the ~= to calls to appender.put(data);
Just making Subdata an Appender!(string[][]) (or
Appender!(Tuple!(string, string)[])) is enough since it already
o
25 matches
Mail list logo
