Re: arrays, mmu, addressing choices

2016-08-09 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 15:29:43 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: On Monday, 8 August 2016 at 21:45:06 UTC, Charles Hixson wrote: by the way, you are Jonathan M Davis right ?

Re: arrays, mmu, addressing choices

2016-08-09 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Monday, 8 August 2016 at 21:45:06 UTC, Charles Hixson wrote: I have a rather large array that I intend to build. but much of it will only occasionally be used. Will the unused sections automatically be paged out? If it matters my system is Debian Linux. This array will be indexed by a

[OT] Re: Why D isn't the next "big thing" already

2016-08-01 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 18:15:49 UTC, Gorge Jingale wrote: On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 10:11:46 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: it you think that you know the things better than somebody

Re: Why Does Dscanner Warn About a Missing toHash if opEquals is Defined?

2016-07-31 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 15:21:01 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: Is it really a problem? What are the pitfalls of defining one but not the other? iirc usage in an AA requires both.

Re: Why D isn't the next "big thing" already

2016-07-31 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: it you think that you know the things better than somebody who actually *lived* there in those times... well, keep thinking that. also, don't forget to teach physics to

Re: [OT] Re: Why D isn't the next "big thing" already

2016-07-30 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 23:11:23 UTC, Seb wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: it

Re: Why D isn't the next "big thing" already

2016-07-30 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: it you think that you know the things better than somebody

Re: Why D isn't the next "big thing" already

2016-07-30 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: it you think that you know the things better than somebody who actually *lived* there in those times... well, keep thinking that. also, don't forget to teach physics to

Re: Why D isn't the next "big thing" already

2016-07-30 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 11:46:11 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 11:31:26 UTC, LaTeigne wrote: For example in the 2000's Delphi was incredibly popular in Russia because the holder at this time (so Borland unless it was already Code Gear) sold literally **hundreds** of

Re: Why D isn't the next "big thing" already

2016-07-30 Thread LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 01:32:50 UTC, Karabuta wrote: On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 at 15:11:00 UTC, llaine wrote: Hi guys, I'm using D since a few month now and I was wondering why people don't jump onto it that much and why it isn't the "big thing" already. Everybody is into javascript