I was still using 2.066.1.
When I try to build using 2.067.0 or 2.067.1 I get:
Linking...
checkpoint(256)
--- errorlevel 1
with an "Unexpected OPTLINK Termination" popup which lists a
bunch of registers.
I'm not sure how to proceed..
On Thursday, 7 May 2015 at 10:43:28 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Thursday, 7 May 2015 at 10:39:09 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2015 10:33:44 +
Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
struct S
{
int i;
auto foo2(T)(int j) {
i=j;
}
static S foo(T)(i
Is it not possible to have a static function template with the
same name as the non-static version?
struct S
{
int i;
auto foo(T)(int j) {
i=j;
}
static auto foo(T)(int j) {
S s;
s.foo!T(j);
return s;
}
}
void main()
{
auto s = S.foo!boo
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 14:25:30 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:58:20 +
Lemonfiend via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:57:16 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:35:44 +0
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:57:07 UTC, Daniel Kozák via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
V Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:35:44 +
Lemonfiend via Digitalmars-d-learn
napsáno:
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:08:34 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:52
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:57:16 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:35:44 +
Lemonfiend via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:08:34 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:52:11 +0
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:08:34 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:52:11 +
Lemonfiend via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Consider the following:
---
enum Foo { BAR, }
mixin template S(string s_)
{
enum s = s_;
}
void main()
{
mixin S
Consider the following:
---
enum Foo { BAR, }
mixin template S(string s_)
{
enum s = s_;
}
void main()
{
mixin S!(Foo.BAR.stringof); // Error: identifier 'stringof' of
'Foo.BAR.stringof' is not defined
enum e = Foo.BAR.stringof;
mixin S!(e); // works fine
}
---
Why
The problem is not the alias. The error message is about using
the same identifier for two different things:
C:\...\temp_0186F968.d(13,1): Error: declaration foo(T)(T t,
int i) is already defined.
I'm not sure what is giving you that particular error. Without
the alias it compiles and runs fin
D is fine with alias this overloaded function:
---
void foo(int t) {}
void foo(int t, int i) {}
alias bar = foo;
---
But isn't as happy aliasing these function templates:
---
void foo(T)(T t) {}
void foo(T)(T t, int i) {}
alias bar = foo!int;
---
Is there some way/other syntax to make an alias
On Tuesday, 11 November 2014 at 15:53:37 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Don't know whether it's documented, but it's a consequence of
using string mixins.
unaryFun (which is used internally by map) is implemented this
way:
auto unaryFun(ElementType)(auto ref ElementType __a)
{
mixin
Oh, no it doesn't. My bad.
It was all about !(Foo) vs !(`Foo(a)`). Is there somewhere I can
read more about this?
The code you were trying to write:
struct Foo(T) {
T t;
}
void main() {
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.array;
float[] vals = [1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1];
auto arr = vals.map!(Foo!float).array;
arr.writeln;
}
Sorry, my example had an unneeded template. Simply this (and also
I'm trying to do something simple like creating an array of
struct S from a float array via map:
---
void main()
{
float[] vals = [1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1];
import std.algorithm: map;
auto arr = vals.map!`S(a)`.array;
writeln(arr);
}
struct S(T)
{
T t;
}
---
I get:
src\app.d(19): Error: None of the overloads of 'foo' are callable
using argument types (C3), candidates are:
src\app.d(28):main.foo(C1 c)
src\app.d(38):main.foo(C2 c)
It does work when I explicitly import c3.foo.
--- file app.d
module app;
import std.stdio;
import c3;
unittest
{
auto s = SList!int(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
auto r = s[];
popFrontN(r, 3);
auto r1 = s.linearRemove(r);
assert(s == SList!int(1, 2, 3));
assert(r1.empty);
}
This works:
auto s = SList!int(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
auto r = s[];
popFrontN(r, 1);
auto r1 = s.linearRemove(r);
This
linearRemove is linear, so I think it accepts a range. Perhaps
the "once" range is enough.
I cannot find once in the docs. Did you mean std.range.only?
Error: function std.container.SList!(Tree).SList.linearRemove
(Range r) is not callable using argument types (OnlyResult!(Tree,
1u))
---
module main;
void main()
{
struct Tree { int apples; }
import std.container;
SList!Tree list;
Tree tree = Tree(5);
list.insert(tree);
//list.linearRemove(tree); // <-- Error. What is the correct way?
}
---
This does not compile on Windows, but does compile on Mac:
---
module main;
void main()
{
import std.path;
enum bar = import(`dir` ~ dirSeparator ~ `bar.txt`);
}
---
The docs say:
http://dlang.org/expression.html#ImportExpression
"Implementations may restrict the file name in or
When a struct is passed to a function as argument, it is first
copied and at the end destructed. But in the following code it is
not copied, yet still destructed?
module main;
import std.stdio;
struct C
{
A[] _objs;
this(A[] objs...)
{
writeln(` C thi
I just tried the new beta, and the issue remains.
I think this is what you are looking for:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html#import_package
What an odd place to put it..
Too bad, it doesn't mention anything about calling the functions
like in my example, and why some do/don't work. I'd hoped for
more.
The following behavior seems odd to me. Could anyone explain why
it works as it does? (Does package.d have a page on dlang.org?)
--- main.d
module main;
void main()
{
test1();
test2();
}
void test1()
{
import pack;
// works
foo();
// works, did
Sorry, that's
--- pack/package.d
and
--- pack/sub.d
On Friday, 27 December 2013 at 08:57:02 UTC, Ravn wrote:
On Friday, 27 December 2013 at 07:31:19 UTC, nazriel wrote:
On Friday, 27 December 2013 at 06:39:54 UTC, Ravn wrote:
Hi, I'm trying get the directory path and time at which the
compilation was made (not when the program is run), something
On Tuesday, 24 December 2013 at 16:11:15 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/24/2013 04:13 AM, Lemonfiend wrote:
std.file.rmdirRecurse refuses to remove readonly files.
How would I go about deleting them anyway?
Call std.file.setAttributes() first, which has apparently been
added just three days
std.file.rmdirRecurse refuses to remove readonly files.
How would I go about deleting them anyway?
On Monday, 25 November 2013 at 17:57:21 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 25 November 2013 at 17:38:00 UTC, Lemonfiend wrote:
&_this
vs
_this.ptr
I had thought those would give the same result, but apparently
not?
Think about slice as a struct with two fields - data pointer
and data le
On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 19:21:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/21/2013 07:22 AM, Lemonfiend wrote:
> I'm wondering if it's possible to have a struct in D which
uses the same
> pointer and memory as returned by the extern C function.
> This would allow me to manip
On Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 23:08:15 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 15:32:08 UTC, Lemonfiend
wrote:
The docs only mention
http://assimp.sourceforge.net/lib_html/config_8h.html#afc0a4c00fb90c345eb38fe3f7d7c8637
which is less than helpful..
I'm not
This might be OT, or missing in Derelict's Assimp bindings, I'm
not sure.
The aiPostProcessSteps.RemoveComponent flag signals that I want
Assimp to skip importing certain components.
But where/how do I specify these?
The docs only mention
http://assimp.sourceforge.net/lib_html/config_8h.html
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 20:36:39 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 11.09.2013 18:13, Lemonfiend wrote:
Oops, I forgot to say what I actually did.
I added derelict to Compiler->General->Additional Imports.
The code is just this:
module main;
import std.stdio;
Oops, I forgot to say what I actually did.
I added derelict to Compiler->General->Additional Imports.
The code is just this:
module main;
import std.stdio;
import derelict.opengl3.gl3;
void main()
{
writeln("Hello D-World!");
}
And the build output is a symbol undefined linker issue
Now that VisualD has been officially accepted onto the
d-programming-language github, I decided to give it a try.
And failed.
Say I want to import derelict, how would I go about it?
Thanks.
On Monday, 24 June 2013 at 15:46:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 11:29:10 -0400, Lemonfiend
wrote:
On Sunday, 23 June 2013 at 15:15:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-06-23 13:26, Lemonfiend wrote:
foreach (I i; array) {
if (B b = cast(B) i) { ... }
}
Thanks
On Sunday, 23 June 2013 at 15:15:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-06-23 13:26, Lemonfiend wrote:
foreach (I i; array) {
if (B b = cast(B) i) { ... }
}
Thanks all 3 of you for the quick and identical answers. :)
It had not occurred to me to use a cast for this, but indeed
the
foreach (I i; array) {
if (B b = cast(B) i) { ... }
}
Thanks all 3 of you for the quick and identical answers. :)
It had not occurred to me to use a cast for this, but indeed the
language ref says the same:
"In order to determine if an object o is an instance of a class B
use a cast"
It
I'm trying to create a fairly generic component system, where an
object iterates over a bunch of other objects that all implement
a certain interface.
And this all works fine, however, I would also like to be able to
get objects of a specific type (a la instanceOf), and I can't
figure out how t
On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 14:55:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 14:30:19 UTC, Lemonfiend wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in updating the existing OpenCL bindings
(https://github.com/Trass3r/cl4d) so they work with Derelict3,
but have never undertaken such a task.
Hi,
I'm interested in updating the existing OpenCL bindings
(https://github.com/Trass3r/cl4d) so they work with Derelict3,
but have never undertaken such a task.
I'm not sure where/how to begin.
Does anyone have any advice? :)
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 21:31:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 22:24:19 Lemonfiend wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 21:03:54 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> http://dlang.org/expression.html#FunctionLiteral
>
> Function parameters/variables are decl
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 21:03:54 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
http://dlang.org/expression.html#FunctionLiteral
Function parameters/variables are declared in D using
"ReturnType function(ParameterTypes) symbol". "function" is a
keyword here, it can be swapped for "delegate" to get, em,
delegat
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to do call different functions within a
loop, so I won't have to write multiple functions with the same
looping mechanism.
I'm not sure if I'm explaing this very well, but this very simple
example should clarify:
void foo(int[] arr)
{
foreach(int val; arr)
On Wednesday, 18 July 2012 at 12:15:52 UTC, Lemonfiend wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 02:30:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/11/2012 04:25 AM, ixid wrote:
in some way it sees global immutables almost as enums
This seems like a bad idea. Consistency of behaviour would
seem to be a
good
On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 02:30:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/11/2012 04:25 AM, ixid wrote:
in some way it sees global immutables almost as enums
This seems like a bad idea. Consistency of behaviour would
seem to be a
good principle to expect of a language.
You are right; this is a b
On Monday, 16 July 2012 at 19:46:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, July 16, 2012 19:02:48 Lemonfiend wrote:
According to the bugzilla referenced in the error this was
fixed;
perhaps not?
The commit date for the fix is after the release of 2.059, so
presumably, it
works just fine
On Monday, 16 July 2012 at 17:02:52 UTC, Lemonfiend wrote:
[DMD32 D Compiler v2.059]
Hello,
I was rewriting some code so some large data array was a
separate data file, and got an abnormal program termination,
with the error:
C:\D\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\conv.d(2704): Error
[DMD32 D Compiler v2.059]
Hello,
I was rewriting some code so some large data array was a separate
data file, and got an abnormal program termination, with the
error:
C:\D\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\conv.d(2704): Error:
function std.conv.parse!(float[],string).parse compiler erro
On Sunday, 8 July 2012 at 22:10:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
When tmp1 is defined globally, dmd is doing something
different, in some way it sees global immutables almost as
enums... I don't know if this is present in D specs.
You see it well with this test program:
immutable int[] A = [1];
te
On Sunday, 8 July 2012 at 22:10:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
When tmp1 is defined globally, dmd is doing something
different, in some way it sees global immutables almost as
enums... I don't know if this is present in D specs.
You see it well with this test program:
immutable int[] A = [1];
te
Hi,
I seem to have run into a strange error..
When I put tmp1 outside the main loop, it compiles fine and gives
the expected output.
When tmp1 is put inside the main loop, the compiler seems to get
stuck in a loop?
I've tested it on: http://dlang.org/index.html
See error on bottom (lol)
---
51 matches
Mail list logo
