Hello!
Is there any debuging support for Intelij Idea's D plugin?
Thanks!
Hello!
import std.stdio;
interface I {
}
interface B : I {
void test();
}
interface C : I {
void test1();
}
class A : B, C {
override void test() {}
override void test1() {}
}
void main() {
A a = new A();
I b = cast(B)a;
I c = cast(C)a;
w
Hi! I've been experimenting with D functions, and found this
piece of code:
//
int abc(int delegate(long i));
int def(int function(long s));
void test() {
int b = 3;
abc( (long c) { return 6 + b; } ); // inferred to delegate
def( (long c) { return c * 2; } ); // inferred to function
}
/
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 15:12:58 UTC, Pavel wrote:
Hi! I've been experimenting with D functions, and found this
piece of code:
//
int abc(int delegate(long i));
int def(int function(long s));
void test() {
int b = 3;
abc( (long c) { return 6 + b; } ); // inferred to delegate
def(
Ok, let me start with the sample code:
import std.stdio;
import std.json;
void main() {
scope(failure) writeln("FaILED!!");
string jsonStr = `{ "name": "1", "type": "r" }`;
auto parsed = parseJSON(jsonStr);
string s = parsed["fail"].str;
writeln(s == "");
writeln(s is null);
writel
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:22:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:15:37 UTC, Pavel wrote:
string s = parsed["fail"].str;
Since there is no entry "fail" in the object, it returns a null
JSON_VALUE pointer. Trying to get the string out of it is then
seen as a nul
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:31:30 UTC, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 24.07.2014 17:29, schrieb Pavel:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:22:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:15:37 UTC, Pavel wrote:
string s = parsed["fail"].str;
Since there is no entry "fail" in the obj
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:20:58 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:15:36 +, Pavel wrote:
Ok, let me start with the sample code:
import std.stdio;
import std.json;
void main() {
scope(failure) writeln("FaILED!!");
string jsonStr = `{ "name": "1", "type": "r" }`;
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:34:22 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/24/2014 08:29 AM, Pavel wrote:
writeln(parsed["fail"] == null);
Now compiler complains:
Error: incompatible types for ((parsed.opIndex("fail")) ==
(null)):
'JSONValue' and 'typeof(null)'
WAT?!
Comparing against null sho
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:32:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:15:37 UTC, Pavel wrote:
Ok, let me start with the sample code:
import std.stdio;
import std.json;
void main() {
scope(failure) writeln("FaILED!!");
string jsonStr = `{ "name": "1", "type": "r" }`;
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:42:58 UTC, Pavel wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:38:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:32:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:15:37 UTC, Pavel wrote:
Ok, let me start with the sample code:
import std.stdio;
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:38:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:32:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:15:37 UTC, Pavel wrote:
Ok, let me start with the sample code:
import std.stdio;
import std.json;
void main() {
scope(failure) writeln("F
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:48:32 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:42:58 UTC, Pavel wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:38:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:32:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:15:37 UTC, Pav
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 15:59:52 UTC, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 24.07.2014 17:54, schrieb Pavel:
Guess what, here's a new snippet:
import std.stdio;
import std.json;
void main() {
scope(failure) writeln("FaILED!!");
string jsonStr = `{ "name": "1", "type": "r" }`;
auto parsed = parse
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 16:02:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 03:54:20PM +, Pavel via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
Guess what, here's a new snippet:
import std.stdio;
import std.json;
void main() {
scope(failure) writeln(&q
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 16:09:25 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:04:01 +, Pavel wrote:
Thanks to all you folks who explained "in" operator for me. My
bad.
Let's focus on the real problem, which is JSON wrapper class.
Is it
needed? Wouldn't it be better to get AA from
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 18:49:27 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 7/24/14, 1:58 PM, Justin Whear wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:49:27 -0300, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Nope, a JSON can only be an array or an object (hash).
Ary, can you point out the place in the spec where this is
specified?
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 16:09:25 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:04:01 +, Pavel wrote:
Thanks to all you folks who explained "in" operator for me. My
bad.
Let's focus on the real problem, which is JSON wrapper class.
Is it
needed? Wouldn't it be better to get AA from
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 16:09:25 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:04:01 +, Pavel wrote:
Thanks to all you folks who explained "in" operator for me. My
bad.
Let's focus on the real problem, which is JSON wrapper class.
Is it
needed? Wouldn't it be better to get AA from
19 matches
Mail list logo
