Is there a reason that it's unavailable on OS X when it works
fine on Linux? The functions exist on OS X, and it's easy enough
to compile C programs using setjmp there; but not D programs. I
don't think I'm getting a betterC experience on the Mac.
I'd also ask why the there are no D docs for
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 at 22:47:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, December 06, 2016 22:13:54 bpr via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 at 17:00:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Sure, there are folks who would prefer not to have to deal with
the GC but throw
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 at 22:23:25 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 at 22:13:54 UTC, bpr wrote:
Those programmers who are comfortable working in a GC-ed
language will likely eschew D because D's GC is really not
that great.
So someone working with Ruby is not going to
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 at 17:00:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
So, while there are certainly folks who would prefer using D as
a better C without druntime or Phobos, I think that you're
seriously overestimating how many folks would be interested in
that. Certainly, all of the C++
