On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 17:30:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
hOn 07/03/2017 10:13 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> [...]
struct with
> [...]
I had difficulty understanding the requirements. For example,
it's not clear whether you want the literal "first" and
"second" names.
[...]
Thanks Ali,
hOn 07/03/2017 10:13 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> It's not exactly the same, as first and second should be struct with
> partial fields from Foo, of different types.
I had difficulty understanding the requirements. For example, it's not
clear whether you want the literal "first" and "second" n
On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 16:41:51 UTC, vit wrote:
On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 13:53:45 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
[...]
//https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d59469c264b2
import std.algorithm : map, copy, equal;
import std.range : iota;
struct Foo {
int[3] a;
string[2] b;
}
ref T first(R : T[],
On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 13:53:45 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
I've struct like that:
struct Foo {
int a_1; float a_2; string a_3;
string b_1; double b_2;
}
I would like to transparently access that like:
foo.a.first
foo.b.second = "baz";
with an helper like:
auto a(...) { ... }
aut
I've struct like that:
struct Foo {
int a_1; float a_2; string a_3;
string b_1; double b_2;
}
I would like to transparently access that like:
foo.a.first
foo.b.second = "baz";
with an helper like:
auto a(...) { ... }
auto b(...) { ... }
that can be used also in functions that are exp