On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 22:50:22 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 22:09:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 17:16:11 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
DIPs are not voted on.
Thanks for letting me know, answers my question.
Our leaders would perhaps
Cecil Ward wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 17:19:52 UTC, ketmar wrote:
it is explicitly stated in DIP that existing syntax will not be
deprecated/removed. i guess that reading the DIP before expressing your
opinion is the prerequisite...
Good to know. A relief.
I am full of pain
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 22:09:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 17:16:11 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
DIPs are not voted on.
Thanks for letting me know, answers my question.
Our leaders would perhaps find a simple pair of numbers to be a
useful additional metric?
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at 17:19:52 UTC, ketmar wrote:
it is explicitly stated in DIP that existing syntax will not be
deprecated/removed. i guess that reading the DIP before
expressing your opinion is the prerequisite...
Good to know. A relief.
I am full of pain drugs and missed the
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:16:11PM +, Cecil Ward via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is there a way I can simply register my vote eg about DIP 1009? My
> vote is 'no thanks'. Like the existing system, don't care about the
> alleged verbosity / room thing, and please whatever do not deprecate
>
Cecil Ward wrote:
Is there a way I can simply register my vote eg about DIP 1009? My vote
is 'no thanks'. Like the existing system, don't care about the alleged
verbosity / room thing, and please whatever do not deprecate the existing
syntax because I use it all over the place and the blocks
Is there a way I can simply register my vote eg about DIP 1009?
My vote is 'no thanks'. Like the existing system, don't care
about the alleged verbosity / room thing, and please whatever do
not deprecate the existing syntax because I use it all over the
place and the blocks can have complex
