On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:12:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:04:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
How about this:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
T factory(T)() {
return T();
}
void main()
{
auto a = factory!(A);
}
That's what I was looking for, I
On 1/05/2015 10:01 p.m., Chris wrote:
What would be the D equivalent of the factory pattern? This obviously
doesn't work:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
auto factory(string type) {
if (type == A)
return A();
else if (type == B)
return B();
else
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:04:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
How about this:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
T factory(T)() {
return T();
}
void main()
{
auto a = factory!(A);
}
That's what I was looking for, I just couldn't get it right.
Thanks.
Rikki:
I
How about this:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
T factory(T)() {
return T();
}
void main()
{
auto a = factory!(A);
}
What would be the D equivalent of the factory pattern? This
obviously doesn't work:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
auto factory(string type) {
if (type == A)
return A();
else if (type == B)
return B();
else
return A(); // default
}
void main()
{
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:04:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
How about this:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
T factory(T)() {
return T();
}
void main()
{
auto a = factory!(A);
}
Of course, you can restrict the type to A or B, or both:
T factory(T)() if
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:46:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:27:16 UTC, biozic wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:12:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:04:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
How about this:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
T
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:27:16 UTC, biozic wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:12:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:04:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
How about this:
struct A {
int x = 42;
}
struct B {
int x = 7;
}
T factory(T)() {
return T();
}
void main()
{
auto a =
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:47:22 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:46:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:27:16 UTC, biozic wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:12:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:04:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
How about this:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 11:01:29 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:47:22 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:46:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:27:16 UTC, biozic wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 10:12:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 11:01:29 UTC, Chris wrote:
This aside, how would I get something to load dynamically? It's
either mismatched function return type or (with type check)
variable X cannot be read at compile time:
void main(string[] args) {
auto type = args[1];
auto myType =
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 11:11:28 UTC, biozic wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 11:01:29 UTC, Chris wrote:
Thinking about it,
T factory(T)() {
return T();
}
is better suited for a factory (with static type checks).
But then I don't know what factory!X() provides that X() alone
doesn't.
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 11:20:32 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 11:11:28 UTC, biozic wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 11:01:29 UTC, Chris wrote:
Thinking about it,
T factory(T)() {
return T();
}
is better suited for a factory (with static type checks).
But then I don't know
13 matches
Mail list logo
