I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to check which thread
might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check number of messages piled
up for each of them, but I could not find a way to do that. Is it possible?
Every detail about MessageBox seems to be hidden...
--
Marek Januk
On 8/6/13, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
> I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to check which thread
> might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check number of messages piled
> up for each of them, but I could not find a way to do that. Is it possible?
>
> Every detail about Messag
On 08/05/2013 04:18 PM, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to check which thread
might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check number of messages piled
up for each of them, but I could not find a way to do that. Is it possible?
Every detail about Me
Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 04:18 PM, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
>> I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to check which
>> thread might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check number of
>> messages piled up for each of them, but I could not find a way to do
>> that. Is it
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 06:15:20 UTC, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 08/05/2013 04:18 PM, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to
check which
thread might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check
number of
messages piled up for
Gabi wrote:
> Why not go for the trivial solution - just increase/decrease a
> counter for each push/pop message?
Yeah, that's most likely what I'll end up with, but it's a pity such
information exists and I only can't access it because someone decided to
make it private... or should I file a b
Am 06.08.2013 09:30, schrieb Marek Janukowicz:
Gabi wrote:
Why not go for the trivial solution - just increase/decrease a
counter for each push/pop message?
Yeah, that's most likely what I'll end up with, but it's a pity such
information exists and I only can't access it because someone decid
dennis luehring wrote:
> the question is do the published counter then needs locking - and make
> it slow for all - just for beeing getable?
Good point - but I believe the code operating on the counter is synchronized
already, so synchronized getter would not really slow things down.
--
Marek J
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 07:47:10 UTC, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
dennis luehring wrote:
the question is do the published counter then needs locking -
and make
it slow for all - just for beeing getable?
Good point - but I believe the code operating on the counter is
synchronized
already, so
On Aug 5, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
> I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to check which thread
> might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check number of messages piled
> up for each of them, but I could not find a way to do that. Is it possible?
> Every
06-Aug-2013 03:18, Marek Janukowicz пишет:
I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to check which thread
might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check number of messages piled
up for each of them, but I could not find a way to do that. Is it possible?
Every detail about Message
On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> 06-Aug-2013 03:18, Marek Janukowicz пишет:
>> I'm using std.concurrency message passing and I'd like to check which thread
>> might be a bottleneck. The easiest would be check number of messages piled
>> up for each of them, but I could not fi
12 matches
Mail list logo
