Seems barely maintained and there was a proposed replacement
claiming it was broken(http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.signal)
that never got approved.
Is std.signals worth using over a dub package?
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:54:01 +, weaselcat wrote:
> Seems barely maintained and there was a proposed replacement claiming it
> was broken(http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.signal)
> that never got approved.
>
> Is std.signals worth using over a dub package?
they both suxalot. both of them are
On Thursday, March 05, 2015 21:54:01 weaselcat via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Seems barely maintained and there was a proposed replacement
> claiming it was broken(http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.signal)
> that never got approved.
>
> Is std.signals worth using over a dub package?
I think that
