On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 20:58:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion on the question but I tend to
agree with the current behavior because it's easy to add the
attributes anyway.
On Tuesday, 31 August 2021 at 00:36:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Attributes used to propagate
On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 20:26:46 UTC, Benoît Dubreuil wrote:
My question is:
In the source file `dummy.dummy.d`, why the first labelled
attributes `@safe` and `@nogc` have no effect inside the
struct's scope? In other words, why do I need to repeat
labelled attributes statements in orde
I don't have a strong opinion on the question but I tend to agree with
the current behavior because it's easy to add the attributes anyway.
Going off topic, I want to mention that the 'in' and 'out' contracts
have a simpler syntax now and that the 'do' (or 'body') keyword is
optional in that p
I've got the following module `dummy.dummy.d`:
```d
module dummy;
@safe:
@nogc:
struct Dummy
{
// TODO: Why do I need to repeat those? Aren't the formers
still effective for inner scopes?
@safe:
@nogc:
static const int MAX_MEMBER_INT = 3;
int memberInt;
string memberStr;
