On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 04:17:05 UTC, Pie? wrote:
Ok, I will assume it will be able to be removed for release. It
is an easy check(just search if binary contains file info). I'm
sure an easy fix could be to write 0's over the data in the
binary if necessary.
Binaries aren't magical
On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 01:39:11 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
This doesn't seem to be the case though in more complex
examples ;/
it is.
My code is almost identical do what you have written
your code is *completely* different. that's why there are no
traces of CTFE values in my sample.
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 07:03:21 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 22:02:44 UTC, Joerg Joergonson
wrote:
Lol, who says you have access to my software? You know, the
problem with assumptions is that they generally make no sense
when you actually think about them.
oh, yeah. it
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 13:03:47 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 18:47:59 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
In any case, this is impossible. D has no such concept as
"compile-time-only" values, so any usage of a value risks
embedding it into the binary.
sure, it has.
template
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 18:47:59 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
In any case, this is impossible. D has no such concept as
"compile-time-only" values, so any usage of a value risks
embedding it into the binary.
sure, it has.
template ParseData (string text) {
private static enum Key =
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 22:09:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
Not necessarily, You chased that rabbit quite far! The data
your reading could contain sensitive information only used at
compile time and not meant to embed. For example, the file
could contain login and password to an SQL database
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 12:48:43 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 22:02:44 UTC, Joerg Joergonson
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 22:09:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
Accessing a SQL server at compile time seems like a huge
abuse of CTFE (and I'm pretty sure it's
On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 22:02:44 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 22:09:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
Accessing a SQL server at compile time seems like a huge abuse
of CTFE (and I'm pretty sure it's impossible at the moment).
Why do I need to install and set up a MySQL
On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 22:02:44 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
Lol, who says you have access to my software? You know, the
problem with assumptions is that they generally make no sense
when you actually think about them.
oh, yeah. it suddenly reminds me about some obscure thing. other
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 22:09:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:57:20 UTC, Pie? wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:31:32 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
[...]
Not necessarily, You chased that rabbit quite far! The data
your reading could contain sensitive information
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 22:09:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
Accessing a SQL server at compile time seems like a huge abuse
of CTFE (and I'm pretty sure it's impossible at the moment).
Why do I need to install and set up a MySQL database in order
to build your software?
Presumably you
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:57:20 UTC, Pie? wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:31:32 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
But reading sensitive data at compile-time strikes me as
dangerous, depending on your use case. If you are reading
sensitive information at compile time, you are presumably
going to
If I use an enum dmd DOES remove it in release build. But I'm not
sure for the general case yet.
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 02:04:41 UTC, Mithun Hunsur wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:57:20 UTC, Pie? wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:31:32 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
[...]
This doesn't seem to be the case. In a release build, even
though I never "use" the string, it is embedded. I
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:57:20 UTC, Pie? wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:31:32 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 17:31:52 UTC, Pie? wrote:
Is it possible to parse a file at compile time without
embedding it into the binary?
I have a sort of "configuration" file that
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 21:31:32 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 17:31:52 UTC, Pie? wrote:
Is it possible to parse a file at compile time without
embedding it into the binary?
I have a sort of "configuration" file that defines how to
create some objects. I'd like to be
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 17:31:52 UTC, Pie? wrote:
Is it possible to parse a file at compile time without
embedding it into the binary?
I have a sort of "configuration" file that defines how to
create some objects. I'd like to be able to read how to create
them but not have that config file
Is it possible to parse a file at compile time without embedding
it into the binary?
I have a sort of "configuration" file that defines how to create
some objects. I'd like to be able to read how to create them but
not have that config file stick around in the binary.
e.g., (simple
18 matches
Mail list logo
