Hello tim,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:58:57 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello tim,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:14:10 +1300, Denis Koroskin
<2kor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +1300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:58:57 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello tim,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:14:10 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +1300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28 +1300, Denis
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:38:18 +0300, Tim M wrote:
class B : A,I
{
void foo() { A.foo(); }
}
void main()
{
}
It is too verbose and makes twice an overhead. I'd like to avoid this
solution.
Any reasonable compiler would inline the call to A.foo.
In fact, I belie
Hello Daniel,
[snip]
B inherits all the functions from A implicitly. You stil may
override any of the I interface functions if need be:
class B : A, I
{
override void foo() { ... }
// int bar() is inherited from A
}
Having B explicitly override all the base class virtual functions
and forward
Hello tim,
It not a bug though. It's all here
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/interface.html and it works like it
says. Is there a problem?
The only thing that might be close to a bug, I think, is the inability of
the "alias" to satisfy the interface contract reimplementation.
-JJR
Hello tim,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:14:10 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +1300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28 +1300, Denis Koroskin
<2kor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009
Hello Daniel,
[snip]
B inherits all the functions from A implicitly. You stil may
override any of the I interface functions if need be:
class B : A, I
{
override void foo() { ... }
// int bar() is inherited from A
}
Having B explicitly override all the base class virtual functions
and forward
It not a bug though. It's all here
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/interface.html and it works like it says.
Is there a problem?
[snip]
B inherits all the functions from A implicitly. You stil may
override any of the I interface functions if need be:
class B : A, I
{
override void foo() { ... }
// int bar() is inherited from A
}
Having B explicitly overr
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:06:50 +0300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:20:19 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:14:10 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +13
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:20:19 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:14:10 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +1300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28 +1300, Denis Koroskin
<2kor...
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:14:10 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +1300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:38:18 +
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +1300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:38:18 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:56:03 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:48:21 +1300, Tim M wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:38:18 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:56:03 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, Joh
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:18:28 +1300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:38:18 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:56:03 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
With this code:
---
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:38:18 +0300, Tim M wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:56:03 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
With this code:
module test5;
interface I
{
void foo();
}
class A : I {
void f
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:56:03 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
With this code:
module test5;
interface I
{
void foo();
}
class A : I {
void foo() { }
}
class B : A, I
{
alias A.foo foo;
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:56:03 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
With this code:
module test5;
interface I
{
void foo();
}
class A : I {
void foo() { }
}
class B : A, I
{
alias A.foo foo;
}
void
Hello John,
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
With this code:
module test5;
interface I
{
void foo();
}
class A : I {
void foo() { }
}
class B : A, I
{
alias A.foo foo;
}
void main()
{
}
I g
Hello tim,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
With this code:
module test5;
interface I
{
void foo();
}
class A : I {
void foo() { }
}
class B : A, I
{
alias A.foo foo;
}
void main()
{
}
I get this erro
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:43:55 +1300, John Reimer
wrote:
With this code:
module test5;
interface I
{
void foo();
}
class A : I {
void foo() { }
}
class B : A, I
{
alias A.foo foo;
}
void main()
{
}
I get th
21 matches
Mail list logo
